Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 21 Feb 2007 20:43:08 -0800
But little charged particles, gravitons, are not the cause.
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf067/sf067a08.htm
A bit more...
Here you can see, some of those currents,http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/ga2cwall.jpg
you can see that galaxies are in clusters,
now with an attractive gravity, in a homogeneous universe
things on that scale, would be rounder, the galaxies in rounder
clumps.
Inertia, or the mass of an atom, is that expansion,
in 4D. space-time.
Given no outside influence, one atom in the void,
it would be in one spot. Not moving horizontally
or vertically, and in fact, because it has some force,
forcing it outward, G, that would tend to make it resist
some force from a horizontal or vertical direction.
Its intrinsic mass, resisting outside force.
So combine the atoms, into a planet, and it is round,
still expanding in unison, and resisting, pressure
from solar wind, but falling towards the sun,
as the space between the earth and the sun,
shrinks.
The outward expansion, tends to make things spin,
and if you examine the old universe, old galaxies,
say from a 2 billion year old universe, the universe
was not as homogeneous in pressure, so things
expanded like they were exploding out, with less
resistance.
But in a 14 billion year old universe, galaxies become
spiral galaxies, as the universal pressure is more
homogeneous.
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1994/52/image/c/
An asteroid, with insufficient mass, is not usually round,
but a planet, with sufficient mass, and age, is usually round,
because the combined expansion, of each atom, homogenizes,
the mass, so that it ends up more round, and round,
is the path of least resistance, also, because it will spin,
and it will rotate, around the sun, and all these things,
bleed off that energy, caused by resistance.
It is a very complex system, when you consider centripetal
force, and all the factors, so it is no wonder, that it took a great
genius, like Einstein, to see that Newtonian gravity was close,
that an attractive universal gravity, was a close approximation,
but it did not explain everything.
And spooky action at a distance, would have to be really
spooky, for gravity to surpass c. It would have to be
instantaneous. But in a way, it is instantaneous, in that
at one point in the universe, the universe is expanding
at the same rate as another. So their commonality,
is what provides simultaneity. But only a common purpose,
which expands the universe shrinking the empty space
between things. But the energy of matter, repelling all other
matter it can effect with em waves within its range.
And when that energy finally does get played out,
then will be the heat death, of the universe.
Now things are so finely balanced, between the expansion,
of the universe, and the repulsive force that dark energy
exuded from matter, has on other matter, that a moon,
like ours, can appear to be falling towards the earth,
as the space shrinks between them, and yet is pushed
away, by the repulsive force, the pressure of dark energy,
so it stays in orbit.
And tidally locked as well.
Moving away at a mere meter per year.
Another curious part of that dark energy being that it comes
as a wave, and waves can cancel out, and if they do,
you get a low pressure area, or they combine, to give you
a high pressure area, attractive and repellent forces, but
all in all, those waves are coming out, from the atom,
so although some will cancel out, right away even, and
form the covalent bond of matter, most of that energy
will go out, and repel other matter keeping the moon,
from crashing into the earth, but falling in a geodesic.
That dark energy, is like the energy you feel when you bring
to like poles of a magnet together.
You can feel it, spongy, cushiony, but switch one pole,
and click, right away, the poles come together.
The waves cancel out.
We suspect, that there is a great deal of dark energy in the universe.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: Mitchell Jones
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- Prev by Date: Re: A few silly questions
- Next by Date: Re: Ambramovich's slightly --> Dazed <-- smile. [ high on Pot ? ]
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-gravitational effects demonstrated using a Van De Graaf generator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading