Re: A few silly questions

Wayne Dobson wrote:
"Androcles" <Engineer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5yzDh.353581$Kh7.81149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I didn't say it was entertaining.

What you said was "I thought it would be interesting ... "10 lines
above. It fails to interest me.

Ok, but this whole thing is about a group of people trying to muffle
free speech and that doesn't sit well with me.

Oh, bull***. You think you're the only one with a right of "free
speech." People who disagree with you also have that right in case you
didn't know.

If someone thinks you are spouting nonsense, they have a perfect right
to say so.

I'm not doing this
for fun, and would have left them alone, but for the fact that they
tried to muzzle me any anyone else who disagrees with them.

Really? Been seeing black helicopters outside your window lately?
People been watching you on the underground?

I
especially didn't like attempts find my home address, to send someone
over.

Nah, you'd much rather insult others from the anonymity of usenet.

Call me cranky.

"Paranoid" is a better term.

When the time comes where everyone on RMA is able to speak freely,
without being subjected to insults,

Wah, wah, wah. Also the height of hypocrisy.

threats, and spoiling tactics, my
behaviour will also change. Not before.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. You'll be nice and polite so long as everybody
tiptoes around and at least pretends to agre with you, no matter how
egregious your comments. Oh, yes, and so long as every claim you make is
accepted without question and you are accepted to be the ultimate authority
on even when you disagree with professionals in the field--either present or
by reference.

Ain't gonna happen.

--
David L. Burkhead "Dum Vivimus Vivamus"
mailto:dburkhead@xxxxxxx "While we live, let us live."
My webcomic Cold Servings
http://www.coldservings.com -- Back from hiatus!
Updates Wednesdays



.