Re: The problem of physical time in today physics
- From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:02:01 -0800
Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
[snip]
Dear Colleagues,
We are pleased to announce our new study
The problem of physical time in today physics
Get a clock. If you don't like oscillators, go for radioactive decay.
In our previous papers devoted to different aspects of the theory of[snop]
relativity and quantum theory we showed gross mistakes of these
theories that make them groundless.
GPS works So do CPUs, MRIs, particle accelerators, and electron
diffraction. What part of physics can you empirically falsify?
the close interrelation of these concepts making the basis of[snip]
classical physics required to involve to the consideration all
definitions of Newtonian mechanics
The universe is not Galilean, lightspeed is finite, and spacetime is
not Euclidean. Pookie-pookie.
We tried to proceed
not from the mathematical formalism as such but, doing not neglecting
it, to base, following Newton,
Newton was wrong. Get over it.
[snip]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The problem of physical time in today physics
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: The problem of physical time in today physics
- References:
- The problem of physical time in today physics
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- The problem of physical time in today physics
- Prev by Date: Re: The problem of physical time in today physics
- Next by Date: Re: Measuring position and velocity of particles
- Previous by thread: Re: The problem of physical time in today physics
- Next by thread: Re: The problem of physical time in today physics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|