Re: perpetual motion



gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 28, 8:46 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is a reason perpetual motion machines can't work. Learn
thermodynamics...

The reason they cant work is: "learn thermodynamics", how extremely
irrational. If you repeat this statement perpetually it doesn't become
more rational.



You, Gaby, can look up the historical papers, data, and all
the evidence you need in the area of conservation of energy
and thermodynamics. The record is clear... and the experiments
are repeatable... many done routinely in classrooms of colleges,
universities and even in high schools.

OK--Given that there IS friction and that there IS radiation
from accelerating magnets, your "device" loses energy in the form
of radiation and is, therefore, slowing down, eventually to stop
its rotational motion. You're just another loser... you'll never
build anything.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Free energy???
    ... the evidence you need in the area of conservation of energy ... OK--Given that there IS friction and that there IS radiation ... your "device" loses energy in the form ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Poyntings theorem is INERTIA
    ... energy (& momentum) conservation. ... In other words EM radiation conservation. ... and re-absorption to conserve the energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Poyntings theorem is INERTIA
    ... energy (& momentum) conservation. ... In other words EM radiation conservation. ... and re-absorption to conserve the energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Poyntings theorem is INERTIA
    ... and MASS. ... In other words EM radiation conservation. ... and re-absorption to conserve the energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Obliterating the Rocket Equation with a Torusail
    ... > assumptions that D-D fusion is a viable power source. ... >>as a fuel deuterium has the highest energy per unit mass ... > radiation of the same temperature. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)