Re: Free energy???



mike3 wrote:


Why say that free energy is impossible? We do not know everything, and
we should never pretend to. Free energy may still be possible, it's
just that nobody has found out how to do it yet.


Given that the total amount of energy in an isolated system remains
constant, your "free energy" would have to come from somewhere, making
it not free.

Conservation of energy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ConservationofEnergy.html

"Put simply, The law of conservation of energy states that energy can
not be created (made from nothing), or destroyed (made to disappear to
no-where) and that energy can be changed from one form to another
(such as electrical energy in to heat energy).
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Masking the Subversion of FTL Technology with Ivory Tower Accreditation
    ... the use of free energy by sidetracking the real version ... but "limited" energy to the taxpayer. ... technology by rewarding institutions with grants who ... chromodynamic gauge transformation during gravitational ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology
    ... dealing with the free energy aspects and devices) are in the latter ... > powered by a combination of electricity and gravity that has no ... Free Energy work of Nikola Tesla. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: FREE ENERGY Devices and Technology
    ... dealing with the free energy aspects and devices) are in the latter ... > powered by a combination of electricity and gravity that has no ... Free Energy work of Nikola Tesla. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Testing Free EneRgy by 420
    ... Scientists flock to test 'free energy' discovery ... A man who claims to have developed a free energy technology which could ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Freeenergynet Homepage Discussion
    ... install and maintain... ... Energy or Perpetual Motion powered ... Perpetual Motion provides us with the potential to recycle any imagineable ... Some of those "free energy" sources are not readily understood... ...
    (sci.skeptic)