Eric Gisse asks the dumb question: "what does hydrogen have to do with free energy?"

On Mar 3, 2:48 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 3, 4:15 am, "gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip junk]


what are you whining now baby? First you pretend things are not real
because the information is not delivered to you on a golden plate.
Seems rather far away from doing research but ok. Then you whine like
a spoiled baby? bheee bheeee wahaaa whaaaa

"" If you can't present a journal article in which free energy is
observed, or a video that does not involve a black box [a moving car =
black box], I am and will continue to be not interested.""

Ow, and where do the little journal articles come from? Send here by
God perhaps?

I even give you your journals because you apparently cant search as
well as post.

"""Invented by Langmuir in 1926 , this device produces a temperature
of 3700 degrees centigrade. Tungsten can be melted, diamond
vapourised.

A jet of hydrogen gas is dissociated as it passes through an electric
arc. H2 H + H - 422 kJ. An endothermic reaction, with the intensely
hot plasma core of the arc providing the dissociation energy. The
atomic hydrogen produced soon recombines; and this recombination is
the source of such high temperatures (easily outperforming oxy-
hydrogen: 2800oC and oxy-acetylene: 3315oC).

The hydrogen can be thought of as simply a transport mechanism to
extract energy from the arc plasma and transfer it to a work surface.
It produces a true flame, as the heat is liberated by a chemical
reaction. H + H H2 + 422kJ. The molecular hydrogen burns off in the
atmosphere, contributing little to the heat output.

From the May 1, 1926 issue of The Science News-Letter -""

is a Nobel price good enough for you idiot?

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1932/langmuir-...

ow you wanted physics papers.

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v40/i1/p78_1
""An equation is derived which gives the accommodation coefficient a
of a gas striking a surface as the ratio of the observed heat loss
from the surface to the theoretical heat loss that would be observed
if all the gas molecules came to thermal equilibrium with the
surface.
The experiments show that at temperatures above 600°K the values of a
for hydrogen (0.20 mm pressure) are greatly reduced by the presence
of
oxygen on the surface of the tungsten. Oxygen is inevitably produced
in a tube when a tungsten filament is burned at T1500°K in hydrogen,
as the atomic H thus formed dislodges oxygen from the walls even when
the walls are cooled in liquid air. Hydrogen is adsorbed on tungsten
at T<1200°K in two different forms, both of which reduce a from its
value for bare tungsten. A film of the first type, which is adsorbed
at T<600°K, changes over into the second type slowly at 600°K and
rapidly at 1100°K. The numerical values of a range from 0.537 for
bare
tungsten to 0.143 for tungsten with an adsorbed hydrogen film of the
second type, and 0.094 for tungsten with an adsorbed film of oxygen.
At T<200°K an oxygen film forms which increases a to 0.422 at 150°K,
provided that a small concentration of oxygen is continually present
in the gas phase.

©1932 The American Physical Society""

booo booo bwhaaaa whaaaa - yes?

So what the hell does Hydrogen have to do with anything?

What hydrogen has to do with it? The topic is about FREE ENERGY
idiot. Sad how everything keeps escaping your attention. Are you
that dumb? It sure seems that way. *** I'm talking with a dumb
person.

What a disappointment.

.

Quantcast