Re: Free energy???
- From: "mike3" <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Mar 2007 15:17:46 -0800
On Mar 3, 10:13 am, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 2, 7:28 pm, "mike3" <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:....
Of course. The matter is, "Which questions are worth tackling?" There
are far too many interesting questions to tackle them all, and so
there is a natural prioritization that must occur.
So if I go and choose to investigate a question _on my own_ that is
too
"low priority" then you believe it would be right to attack me and
claim
I'm wrong before I've even presented a case, and try to stifle the
project?
Even though I would be working like Ed on the Coral Castle, literally?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Free energy???
- From: PD
- Re: Free energy???
- References:
- Free energy???
- From: mike3
- Re: Free energy???
- From: PD
- Re: Free energy???
- From: mike3
- Re: Free energy???
- From: PD
- Free energy???
- Prev by Date: Re: Free energy???
- Next by Date: Re: Eric Gisse asks the dumb question: "what does hydrogen have to do with free energy?"
- Previous by thread: Re: Free energy???
- Next by thread: Re: Free energy???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|