Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:18:43 -0700
In sci.physics, jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:25:02 GMT
<tpsgc4-90g.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
G=EMC^2 Glazier <herbertglazier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ether boils at 96F Either is very explosive. Good engineering could
come up with a clean combustible engine. I have an idea mixed with water
gas(steam) and you would end up with lots of energy. Bert
Engines where the fuel detonates are soon called junk.
Pedant point: Diesel and Gasoline engines fall into this category. :-)
Or did you mean "detonates in the fuel tank"? :-)
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C++ Programming Idea #11823822:
signal(SIGKILL, catchkill);
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: jimp
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- References:
- Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: jimp
- Ether Steam Engine ???
- Prev by Date: Re: Waves and Electromagnetic waves
- Next by Date: Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- Previous by thread: Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- Next by thread: Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
