Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:15:02 GMT
The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In sci.physics, jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:25:02 GMT
<tpsgc4-90g.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
G=EMC^2 Glazier <herbertglazier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ether boils at 96F Either is very explosive. Good engineering could
come up with a clean combustible engine. I have an idea mixed with water
gas(steam) and you would end up with lots of energy. Bert
Engines where the fuel detonates are soon called junk.
Pedant point: Diesel and Gasoline engines fall into this category. :-)
Or did you mean "detonates in the fuel tank"? :-)
It is relatively easy to keep gas under control.
It is rather hard to keep ether from detonation and pre-ignition.
http://www.streetrodstuff.com/Articles/Engine/Detonation/
Also, the smog components of engine exhaust are not a factor of the
fuel. The come from using air which contains nitrogen as the oxidizer.
The higher the combustion temperature, the more smog components you
get.
I'm assuming you are talking about orinary ether as used as an engine
starting aid.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- References:
- Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: jimp
- Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Ether Steam Engine ???
- Prev by Date: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- Next by Date: Re: Entropy classical only?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- Next by thread: Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- Index(es):