Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- From: schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 12 Mar 2007 17:41:34 -0700
The_Man wrote: [...]
The evidence is explicitly clear. The knock-out blow to the landing-
believer theory are the various the non-parallel shadows observed
abundantly in the Apollo photos.
The sun acts as a directional light source placed at infinity. It will
always cast parallel shadows. It is not possible under any
configuration for radial shadows to be cast.
IT'S AS SIMPLE AS THAT.
Notice that the landing-believers can't refute that argument and
resort to childish name-calling. That's indicative of something.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- From: Paul Cardinale
- Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- From: PD
- Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- References:
- Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- From: The_Man
- Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- Prev by Date: Re: Money aint sh_t.
- Next by Date: Re: Ether Steam Engine ???
- Previous by thread: Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- Next by thread: Re: Refutation of the Moon "hoax" idiocy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|