Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"


"hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:RAAJh.3119$I56.2728@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45F6C480.E7E5264D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Suriv wrote: E-mail:- einsteinhoax@xxxxxxxx
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
[snip interminable crap]

Newton: Inertia is a massed body.
Gravitation is an accelerating geometry.
F_i = (m_i)a (inertia)

HAHAHA!

I'd like to see a force act on ONE body!
LAW I. (inertia)
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed thereon.

LAW II. (acceleration)
The alteration of motion is ever proportional to the motive force impressed; and is made in the direction of the right line in which that force is impressed.



Obviously Uncle Fuckwit has Newton's first to laws fumbled.
Hey Uncle Schwartschmuck! Newton says you are a cretin.



F_g = G(m_g)M/r^2 (gravitation)
(m_i)a = G(m_g)M/r^2 (vacuum free fall, F_i = F_g)
(m_i)/(m_g) = constant (at each infinitesimal time interval; the
Equivalence Principle)
Hey schmuck - Newton says you are an ass. The only way to break
Newton consistent with observation is by admitting Einstein or
Einstein-Cartan or Weitzenböck (in which Einstein is a restricted
subset),
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609417
16.8995 deg/yr periastron advance

GPS works.
Idiot. Uncle Al

Hey Idiot Uncle Al, yes "GPS works" but NOT because of
Cartan or Weitzenböck nor the restricted subset-Einstein.
Thanks for that laughs, fanaticAl... ahahaha... ahahanson




.

Quantcast