Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed
- From: "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Mar 2007 09:21:59 -0700
Inverted Gedanken Form
"A set of dog in a park caused the park's existence."
A dog set was to cause the park appears inverted form. A dog
independent of park appears. And the fallacy as form was to be used
to define.
A theorectical fallacy and not a form fallacy for only in physics may
the park not be existing by dog effect.
So the usage was to be the alternative applied thougth experimental
usage. A type of Gedanken. And to define type was the reason for the
inverted.
So these terms mean exact things in physics, type, set class,
existence, relation, function etc.
And the relation between all is a realm of the philosopher physicist.
A student to formal the form of the science in relation to the form of
statement. Here is a thing to consider.
Science as form uses a logical form different from common discourse.
A structure to science appears well founded, but common discourse
allows fallacy to be inferred unless equivalence is applied to test
theory. SO the equivalence principle causes well founded science in
the logic of common abstracted subject predicate.
Without the equivalence a form of validity would allow erratic
experimental design.
So to example again:
Here is the goal, use inverted Gedanken. And appear to cause
independence.
Pick an example any example, and I will use it in example.. This is a
study of mine and I do need a real example to demonstrate.. Try a
common theory.
If you do not like this kind of logical analysis you might want to
never try theoretical physics, btw.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed
- From: nuny@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed
- From: T Wake
- Re: Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed
- Prev by Date: Re: sphere question
- Next by Date: The Double Slit as Gedanken Experiment
- Previous by thread: Inverted Gedanken
- Next by thread: Re: Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|