Re: Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed

On Mar 18, 9:21 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Inverted Gedanken Form

"A set of dog in a park caused the park's existence."

A dog set was to cause the park appears inverted form. A dog
independent of park appears. And the fallacy as form was to be used
to define.

A theorectical fallacy and not a form fallacy for only in physics may
the park not be existing by dog effect.

So the usage was to be the alternative applied thougth experimental
usage. A type of Gedanken. And to define type was the reason for the
inverted.

So these terms mean exact things in physics, type, set class,
existence, relation, function etc.

And the relation between all is a realm of the philosopher physicist.
A student to formal the form of the science in relation to the form of
statement. Here is a thing to consider.

Science as form uses a logical form different from common discourse.
A structure to science appears well founded, but common discourse
allows fallacy to be inferred unless equivalence is applied to test
theory. SO the equivalence principle causes well founded science in
the logic of common abstracted subject predicate.

Without the equivalence a form of validity would allow erratic
experimental design.

So to example again:

Here is the goal, use inverted Gedanken. And appear to cause
independence.

Pick an example any example, and I will use it in example.. This is a
study of mine and I do need a real example to demonstrate.. Try a
common theory.

If you do not like this kind of logical analysis you might want to
never try theoretical physics, btw.

I wasn't going to engage you this time because I agree that a thing
cannot be defined absent context, and vice versa. At least, that's
what I parsed out of what you wrote.

But then the Elevator Gedankenexperiment burbled up from my
subconscious; the standard form disallows any measurements within the
elevator except at a single point within the elevator (comparisons
between points is disallowed for reasons I find spurious), yet an
acceleration _field_ cannot be described at a single point. If one
measures felt acceleration _as if one were in a field_ which is to say
measure the force due to (gravity/acceleration) at two points within
the elevator and then compare them, one can tell whether the
acceleration field has divergence; i.e. is due to a nearby gravitating
mass or accelerated motion.

The context (gravity vs. inertia) is in the standard form rendered
irretrievably ambiguous before the experiment is done, thus rendering
any results ambiguous.

What say you?


Mark L. Fergerson

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: From a Tramp to a King
    ... My wife needed something from the store and I volunteered. ... I drove to the store and stopped at the park on my way home. ... came around a row of cars and trucks the sound grew louder... ... we have all these battles around here about "dog people" and "cat ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: From a Tramp to a King
    ... My wife needed something from the store and I volunteered. ... back then I still snuck off for the occasional Kool Filter King. ... I drove to the store and stopped at the park on my way home. ... we have all these battles around here about "dog people" and "cat ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Inverted Gedanken Form Clarifed
    ... A dog set was to cause the park appears inverted form. ... Science as form uses a logical form different from common discourse. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: phew
    ... National cycle route no 1. ... I'd recommend it if anyone likes walking in the woods, dogging, ... I can remember when as a kid we used to refer to dog walkers as out ... I once went to a park with a partner after leaving the pub for a "kiss ...
    (uk.local.kent)
  • Re: OT: Im considering going "homeless by choice"
    ... Just me and my dog. ... I know three people who have done this living in Golden Gate Park. ... They are basically homeless, they don't work there, ...
    (alt.true-crime)