Re: Science is Dead
- From: "Don Stockbauer" <donstockbauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Mar 2007 09:59:42 -0700
On Mar 20, 4:31 pm, "PD" <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 20, 7:08 am, "Supertech" <ejo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Science is Dead. There will be no new science until the old gate keepers go
dead.
Like Afghanistan's society, the physics community is clannized.
They can not get out of their own shells of clan rules. There needs a
serious breaking of those hard shells of stupidity.
Look at this fresh new ideas and theories and the old gate keepers will
never admit their stupidity.
www.tachyonics.com
Actually, science is not dead at all. There are many people working
very hard with very crazy ideas that might be just crazy enough.
The difference is that they know what they have to demonstrate. They
know that really novel ideas are a dime a dozen (despite the value you
place on your own ideas), but that *right* ideas are extremely
valuable and hard-earned. It's the knowing *how* the rightness of
ideas is earned that you don't have a grip on. For example, nowhere in
your link is there *any* evidence whatsoever of the kind of work that
is needed to evaluate whether a crazy idea is also a right idea. Do
you know what kind of work is required? Perhaps we could start there.
What do you think you have to do to show that your idea is crazy AND
right, and not just crazy?
PD
Hmmmmm......... it's not always so planable. Serendipity often rules,
at least for the paradigm shifts.
"Life's a dance you learn as you go,
sometimes you lead, sometimes you follow.
Don't worry about what you don't know.
Life's a dance you learn as you go."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Science is Dead
- From: PD
- Re: Science is Dead
- References:
- Science is Dead
- From: Supertech
- Re: Science is Dead
- From: PD
- Science is Dead
- Prev by Date: Re: Dumb Question
- Next by Date: An adventure in relative time-keeping
- Previous by thread: Re: Science is Dead
- Next by thread: Re: Science is Dead
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
