Re: Gravity Probe B-failure or special new success?

On Mar 22, 1:25 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
frankli...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 9, 6:58 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have often mentioned the term "polhode" in these status updates,
with a parenthetical reference to the motion of our gyroscope rotors.
Typically, a few days later I then receive a number of email messages,
asking for more information about this exotic word-what is the polhode
motion of the gyro rotors, and why is it important to the GP-B
experiment? In this month's GP-BMission News story, I will attempt to
answer these questions in more detail. I am most grateful to our GP-B
science team for their time and invaluable assistance in writing this
story. -Bob Kahn

A quote is given from the Stanford ProeBwebsite. A force has
effected significantly the data and I was wondering if this polhode
motion was measured on earth while it was gimballed?

A perfect mission did not occur and the interpretation has required
significant polhode signal removal, I think. Does anybody know
exactly.

My problem is the degree of force as strength apparently effected.
And to attribute after the fact a correct is a defective experiment.
The whole thing may have just gone down the tubes, theory verification
wise.

On a lighter note, I commented recently on a frame dragging force
being the cause of apparent dark matter. The guy calls this force,
"spinity".

An apparent problem is the degree of simliarity of the two forces in
general!

I say Stanford needs to confess, and claim spinity's existence!

Spinity! look over on sci.physics.relativity in the past two days.

I have been awaiting the results of the Gravity Probe B only to find
out that any significant results will not be released until November
2007. What the heck is going on? Your post seems to indicate that
there has been some kind of failure in the data collection assumptions
and no valid data may be forthcoming. Is this true???

Douggie is a spewing moron and you are just as stupid for listening to
him.

The GPB data and results releases are still on schedule for the April
APS meeting. What the hell are you babbling about? Go look athttp://einstein.stanford.edu/and see.



Personally, I think that the results, if honestly analysed, will point
to something different - the existence of a preferred frame of
reference corresponding to zero velocity in the aether. If the aether
exists and absolute velocity can be determined, then the major effects
on the Gravity Probe B experiment will be the result of the gyroscopes
dragging and changing direction through this aether. They may see that
if they analyse their data properly, they will see a signal which
corresponds to an effect of a fixed frame - the same one identified by
the COBE satellite as a fixed frame moving at 300Kph in the direction
of the constelation leo. This signal should totally swamp any signal
they are trying to measure from frame dragging. They also won't be
able to subtract out this effect and come up with a genuine result
until they recognize this. Could this be possible?

No, because you are an idiot. The CMBR is not the aether, nor is it
the sign of aether. Furthermore, COBE is nearly 20 years old -
familiarize yourself with WMAP.





fhuprobe- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

See:

http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0205/0205070.pdf
http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/datonmiller.html

These explan for how the COBE experiments point to a fixed frame of
reference from the dipole anisotropy of the Cosmic Background
Radiation.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gravity Probe B-failure or special new success?
    ... with a parenthetical reference to the motion of our gyroscope rotors. ... reference corresponding to zero velocity in the aether. ... corresponds to an effect of a fixed frame - the same one identified by ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravity Probe B-failure or special new success?
    ... with a parenthetical reference to the motion of our gyroscope rotors. ... reference corresponding to zero velocity in the aether. ... corresponds to an effect of a fixed frame - the same one identified by ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Acceleration
    ... >> I think the topic is whether a case can be made for aether resistance ... no resistance to motion has ... >> particulate aether acting virtually as an ideal gas (only Newtonian ... >> circulatory pattern there is still a sink which results in essentially ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... compounded by Newton in his mangling Roemer with Flamsteed in order to ... It was known that Jupiter's moon Io had an irregular motion that sped ... This a noted proposition among astronomers, ... In short,the celestial framework in which relativity and aether ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... compounded by Newton in his mangling Roemer with Flamsteed in order to ... It was known that Jupiter's moon Io had an irregular motion that sped ... This a noted proposition among astronomers, ... In short,the celestial framework in which relativity and aether ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast