Re: Layman's question about Gravitational waves

nuny@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:32 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
n...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 22, 8:41 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Weber's apparatus wasn't sensitive enough, don't you suspect?
I believe you don't know what you're talking about.
http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/schoolsanddivisions/academicschools/socsi/st...
And I'm supposed to have any faith at all in LIGO or LISA? HAH!
Faith is for religions... In science one looks at data, its publication
in research papers and the case made for spending tens of millions of
dollars to do gravity wave research. The conclusive result which might
convince you may be sitting on the hard drives as we speak.

Did you keep going, Mark?
http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/advLIGO/scripts/summary.shtml


Read it to the end. Not impressed. Did you even bother reading the
link I cited to _its_ end, or did you just "react" again?


Mark L. Fergerson


I read the paper and can't agree with the author.

.

Quantcast