Re: My nude beach on the moon.

On Mar 23, 9:49 am, "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 23, 1:39 pm, bradg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

At minimum you're surrounded by 3.14e6 m2

You are? And all of it aiming its entire output just at you?

If you're standing tall, such as on a hill or crater rim is more like
being exposed to 3.14e8 m2.

For starters, you can take the square root of the incoming cosmic hits/
cm2, including a few worthy solar hits/cm2, such as merely 3600 hits
per hour is only worth 60 secondary/recoil outputs of gamma and/or
hard-X-ray bits per cm/2, and at minimum you are unavoidably
surrounded by 3.14e10 cm2.


What happens if somebody else is walking around
1000 m from you? Will the atoms divide their efforts
to irradiate him too?

You're being a rather silly naysay boy, arnt you.

What's the half dosage required mass of shielding against hard-X-rays?

What's the half dosage required mass of shielding against gamma rays?

How much mass are those wussy moonsuits worth?


What if you set up a radiation detector a few meters
away? Will that fool the particles so that you only
get half the output?

Double duh, naysay silly boy.


How radioactive? Got numbers that you didn't pull out
of your anatomy?

Even our NASA/Apollo wizards having reported that our moon on average
offers more than twice the local radioactive element density as Earth
has, with a few pesky hot spots as being potentially lethal zones
which simply need to be avoided at all cost, but I and many others
think it's much worse off than reported, especially since they're
actually good at having lied each and every one of their moonsuit
butts off, on that one as well.

Air force radiation tracking detectors actually utilize the moon for
their instrument calibrations, and there's actually a great deal of
attenuation that's between us and that moon.

Of course, this has nothing to do with the matter of fact that our
naked moon is simply much worse off than any Van Allen badlands could
ever hope to be. Say perhaps a hundred fold if not a thousand fold
worse off because of the local mass that's giving birth to all of
those secondary/recoil photons of xrays and gamma rays.
-
Brad Guth

.