Re: Relativity craziness, and tears from an Einstein Dingleberry


"H. Wabnig" <.... .-- .- -... -. .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -> wrote in message news:fp8l039kk8qq2mub3ckv962l216o99pee1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:01:14 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHA.... ahahahaha.... grievously angry
"H. Wabnig" <.... .-- @ .- --- -. DOT .- -> wabniggered in message
news:f75l03t0cfs3bmf9d31igodsffq7f2m8nb@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:04:59 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHA.... ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHA....
Wabbie aka "H. Wabnig" <.... .-- .- .. --. @ .- --- -. DOT .- -> wrote in
message news:qu2l0312n456br8u8td2m0i6la4o5u5d9n@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Ebay craziness

That's what they give me,Wabbie, to read on item nr. 230110538205
"Atomic Physics film DVD and nuclear reactions" with Einstein's face.
---------------- \Ebay quote:
Dear User:
Unfortunately, access to this particular category or item has been
blocked due to legal restrictions in your home country. Based on our
discussions with concerned government agencies and eBay community
members, we have taken these steps to reduce the chance of
inappropriate items being displayed. Regrettably, in some cases this
policy may prevent users from accessing items that do not violate the
law. At this time, we are working on less restrictive alternatives.
Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may cause you,
and we hope you may find other items of interest on eBay.
Thank You.
Hit the return button to return to the previous page.
------------- \End Ebay quote

Go to hell, Ebay!
w.

[hanson]
See, Wabbie, what relativity brings to you, absolutely!?... ahahaha..
See, even Ebay and "concerned government agencies in your
home country, Austria" have caught on to the con that REL is... ahaha..
Here is some consolation and condolences for you, Wabbie
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/47cc4181eb6470dd
Enjoy!... Don't grieve.
ahahaha.... ahahahahanson

[Wabbie]
Nice to meet you again, hanson.
So if a train goes from San Francisco to Los Angeles with velocity v,
and returns later with velocity -v, the average velocity is
va = v +(-v) = 0 aka "ZERO"
according to Androcles' math which you lick from his arse.
ahahahahahanson!
w.

[hanson]
... ahahaha... But Wabbie, there is no "so", except that it proved
that you could see what's at issue which made you, in your grief,
anger and disappointment exhibit your perverted yearnings for
licking Andro's ass.... ahahahaha... Look, it said in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/47cc4181eb6470dd
"...Now if you still can't see it then don't argue with Andro or me.
=1= Argue with Einstein himself why he was....
=2= Argue with Nobel prize commissioner, Harald Nordensen...
=3= Argue again with Einstein himself who close to ...
=4= Argue with luminaries like Professor Carver A. Mead...
=5= Argue with F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who ...
=6= Argue even with the Brits' conservative Royal Society who...
=7= Argue with the higher the learning institutions in Bavaria who,..
=8= Argue with the heuristics professionals where you'll see.... "

... ahahaha... why are you arguing with me still, Wabbie?
Do you value my opinion over and above the mentioned ones in
1 to 8 above?... That would be wabniggering Relativity at its best.
ahahaha... ahahahanson

Oh yes, opinions.

Having an opinion is better than having nothing,
but still less valuable than having a cozy, waterproof coat.
A coat keeps you comfortable in bad weather,
whereas opinions are useless, even when you happen
to have many opinions on a subject, not just only one.

Alas, if you are unlucky enough as not having a coat,
or in case someone stole it, or you forgot it somewhere,
then it is a warming idea to have opinions.

For example, Androcles' opinion about Einsteins formula
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf

(prefer the pdf version)

Androcles says:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/47cc4181eb6470dd
Wab*** can't be an engineer, he doesn't know how far it is from
A to A r how long it takes to get there, and he thinks velocities go
both ways. An engineer would say
AB/(tB-tA) = c,
BA/(t'A-tB) = -c
or he'd never be able to program a computer.
Computers know all about minus signs, you can't fool them.
What Einstein really says is
AB/(tB-tA) = v-c
BA/(t'A-tB) = v+c
and then, being of average cunning, convinces morons that
that tB is 1/2(t'A-tA).
See if you can impress Wab*** with c + (-c) = 0

May I higlight the center point:
What Einstein really says is
AB/(tB-tA) = v-c
BA/(t'A-tB) = v+c
In Androcles' opinion.

Now go up and click on the pdf version and read the original.
Compare both and make up your opinion.

Androcles may have lost his coat or cloak or mantle,
but he does indeed have opinions, and hanson's opinion is
that Androcles must be right, because he (Andro) does have
opinions which he (hanson) wants to share, which would be
impossible with a coat, even with a raincoat mac, whereas
with opinions it's customary to share them.

May the sun shine on you both, you coatless coat stands.
w.

You are correct, wabbie, we are coatless coat stands,
totally bare and hiding nothing beneath our invisible cloaks.

You, wabbie, seem to confuse fact with opinion in your delusions.
May I highlight the centre point:
What Einstein really says is
AB/(tB-tA) = v-c
BA/(t'A-tB) = v+c
in his paper which you can read for yourself:
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v" - Fuckhead Einstein.

Of course the stupid *** is confused, v doesn't change direction,
c does.

Since you don't know which way the rays are going, may you
shine on the sun.



.

Quantcast