Re: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- From: Ben Newsam <ben.newsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:33:36 +0100
On 30 Mar 2007 17:09:00 -0700, "N.X. Rodser" <npeereboom@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Of course, you would have to mathematically configure the
trajectory at which the individual photons hit the flying electrons,
but would this not solve the seemingly unsolvable problem of precision
of position and the velocity measurements?
If something has a position, then it does not have a velocity, and
vice versa; they are mutually incomaptible. A velocity requires more
than one position and a time difference, and a direction. A position
has none of these.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- References:
- Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- From: N.X. Rodser
- Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- Prev by Date: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- Next by Date: Re: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- Previous by thread: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- Next by thread: Re: Concerning the Uncertainty Principal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|