Re: G/t=u

On Apr 7, 5:36 am, rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Am I serious about big bang on a counter top?
Well I read somewhere someone in Britain was talking about it. Long
ago I said now I've seen everything.
All I can say is if they find a way, to split a *** of nothing into
two somethings, and create a universe, they have to tend it. Don't
look to us to tend it. You could put it in a bell jar like they did
the planet Krypton.
And to think we used to think that if we did any of this we would
explode the earth.

So what then if hypothetically, you took one single quantum foam
bubble and squished it flat with a hammer?
How much energy would be released?
Or, what is a matter anti-matter explosion really like?
http://www.livescience.com/technology/10ways_destroyearth-7.html

If a nuclear explosion, is the nucleus, being compressed into negative
time, then rebounding, what is you did the same to the quantum foam?
Well in all probability that occurs in a supernova explosion. The
actual skin of the bubble, the skin of the foam, is elastic, the
pressure inside of the bubble is uniform because the pressure of the
universe is uniform.
If it is impervious, then the quantum foam would be grainy, and not
elastic. And then you do end up trying to make that fit in with what
we observe with regards to mass and the speed of light and accelerated
mass and all the rest as discussed over the last few days. So theory
wise, thats my conclusion. The quantum foam is not the final word. It
can't be any smaller than that, but it can disappear into the skin of
the other bubbles. So energy is conserved in a way, although we often
see that it doesn't appear to be. But inside of black holes and other
strange things and times like during inflation the change of phase,
who knows, but the actual underlying substance of the universe would
be conserved I would think, and it just takes different forms.
But thats the conservation of substance moreso than conservation of
energy. Simply converting EM into gravity you have two different kinds
of energy one of which is motion. And then you would have to ask, well
where does the motion go and it will disappear with the expanding
universe. So then you have the technicality of shrinking energy is
that still conserved or just explained? Its explained and not
conserved. So the substance is conserved, the energy can take on many
forms and even dissipate into the past.




.

Quantcast