I am just a bison eating grass, alien zookeepers, nothing to see here...
- From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 12 Apr 2007 22:42:37 -0700
How to get a patent for your perpetual motion machine.
1) Take the clerk for a ride in it, and don't stop until he agrees to
give you a patent.
2) Connect your device/appliance/industrial van dergraff hydrogen
emitter to the two slit experiment and blow the front off the cathode
ray tube with emitted photons.
3) Hand the clerk the red button for instant Bose-Enistein condensate
in a flask and tell him if he needs proof, to go ahead and give it a
try. Have him hold the flask between his knees.
In all seriousness I do not know, if a supernova is all that different
from a nuclear blast as they are both mass explosions caused by trying
to go against the expansion of the universe.
The largest blast ever achieved is as you would expect, from a black
hole.
As it would be the farthest back in time possible. Meaning the biggest
build up of pressure behind it.
I am not sure they understood the cause of the blast, but they did
record one of that nature.
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/050105_spaceblastfrm.htm
So basically they don't want to go against the norm which is to say
that this super massive black hole exploded, because of Hawking et al
and their theories in this regard which may need to be revamped, but
you can see how this could happen, if a star collapses, but does not
collapse with enough energy, to supernova, but becomes a black hole,
and consumes enough matter, or even gets triggered some how, reaches
an omega point and kaboom.
Which means that essentially nothing really gets left behind in time
forever.
The skin of the present, is sufficient to keep all substance from this
universe contained in it, preserving it ( the conservation of
substance principle.)
Now you could make an argument then, that that also balances the book
as far as energy goes, but then well once you include energy are you
also including the big bang momentum? Or the inflationary period in
that original energy assessment? Not bloody likely.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 819 April 11, 2007 by Phillip F.Schewe, Ben Stein
- Next by Date: Re: Inertia Tensor Fundamentals
- Previous by thread: Re: NOMINATION: VvFWS Re: Summary of pro-Relativity and anti-Relativity debate
- Next by thread: Re: I am just a bison eating grass, alien zookeepers, nothing to see here...
- Index(es):