Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: "Peter" <Poakfield@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Apr 2007 14:36:39 -0700
On Apr 14, 1:29 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Peter" <Poakfi...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176570680.130725.18410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 14, 12:50 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is a torque when it's viewed from anywhere but
the center of rotation; the torque is calculated
considering the chosen origin as the center of rotation.
The torque may be calculated anyhow, but the fact is that mrw is
conserved.
That's the linear momentum. It's magnitude is conserved
because the speed is constant. Kinetic energy is also
constant in your example. That is, (1/2)*m*v^2 .
Note that momentum is considered to be a vector. Since
the velocity changes direction around the track, mrw
treated as a vector expression ( m*(r x w) ) will not be
a constant over the whole track.
Yes, momentum is a vector. mrw is a vector, because r is a vector; w
is not a vector, it is an angular displacement, which is not a vector,
over time.
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- References:
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: PD
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: PD
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- Prev by Date: Re: Is the space inside atoms expanding?
- Next by Date: Deposit $ 3'600'000 into my account or stop loud-mouthing, tj
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|