Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: "Peter" <Poakfield@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Apr 2007 15:36:49 -0700
On Apr 14, 5:46 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <phineaspuddleduck-8DE2E9.22425614042...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1176586599.745388.92...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Peter" <Poakfi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Note that momentum is considered to be a vector. Since
the velocity changes direction around the track, mrw
treated as a vector expression ( m*(r x w) ) will not be
a constant over the whole track.
Yes, momentum is a vector. mrw is a vector, because r is a vector; w
is not a vector, it is an angular displacement, which is not a vector,
over time.
Peter
Nope
Angular velocity is a vector too, hence the cross product
(Point of contention - -actually a pseudovector, but it still uses the
cross product)
- Show quoted text -
The cross product is also a pseudovector.
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- References:
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: PD
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: PD
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Peter
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- Prev by Date: Re: Gravity Probe B
- Next by Date: Re: PROBE-B Data Released -Sort of
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Kepler's second law
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|