Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
- From: kdthrge@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 25 Apr 2007 19:18:18 -0700
On Apr 24, 2:36 pm, newedana <simplesong1...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Present atomic physics was built based on completely unscientific
fraudulent postulations such as:
1. Atomic orbital electron performs a planetary motion around its
nucleus, a postulation disregarding the fact that atom does not exist
lonely as a single body, and its orbital electron is unable to keep
its planetary motion due to interruptive electromagnetic force given
out from its neighboring other element particles.
2. Electron is unable to move without inducing magnetism in
perpendicular to its moving path. Nevertheless, present atomic model
does not account this magnetism to be added to the centrifugal force
of orbital electron in balancing to its nuclear Coulomb attraction,
since this magnetism acts to straighten linearly its circular orbit.
J.J Thomson neglected this magnetism in measuring e/m value, so the
present mass of electron was greatly overestimated one.
3. It is a basic postulation one proton can attract one electron in
the present atomic model. Nevertheless, a proton can attract 92
electrons if it joins in to a uranium nucleus, so the gross Coulomb
attraction between its nucleus and its 92 orbital electrons turns out
to be 922 = 8464 in average, according to the Coulomb law. This self-
contradiction of Coulomb law found in current atomic physics is due to
its simple imitation of Newton’s gravitation law.
4. There does not exist a discontinuous motion of mass particle in the
space of nature, because discontinuous motion of a mass particle in
scientific sense means that it disappears instantly at a place and
then reappears at another place. However, present atomic model has an
orbital electron moving by such a discontinuous manner, the quantum
jump motion from orbit to orbit.
5. It is a unscientific postulate atomic orbital electron emits
photons or lights as it drops down from a higher energy level to a
lower one, because potential energy is unable to convert into
realistic photons or lights, and such a dropping or a circular motion
of orbital electron is not an oscillation possible to generate light
with electromagnetic wave phase of counter polarity.
6. Probability-electron in the quantum atomic model is unable to
detect with the same probability in the same electron cloud unlike its
postulation. Electron is impossible to cover a three-dimensional x, y,
z space by its orbital motion in balancing its kinetic and potential
energy at the same moment. Nevertheless, the ShrÖdinger wave equation
was built by balancing these two energies.
7. Despite that Bohr’s atomic model was built based on unscientific
first and second postulations as cited above, some basic constants in
present atomic physics were derived from Bohr’s radius ao. For
example, ionization energy Ei of hydrogen atom involves, ao, in Ei = -
e^2/8π εo ao, that represents the gross energy of orbital electron at
Bohr’s radius. The so-called universal constant Planck constant h is
also connected to the Bohr’s radius ao, through Ei =hcR, where c :
speed of light, R: Rydberg frequency, and Ei involves a number of man-
made constants, such as εo and ao. It appears also that Rydberg
frequency was not derived from a pure theoretical base, in respecting
above relation: R=Ei / hc.
8. It is the universal principle, energy of oscillating mass particle
changes in proportional to its frequency square. However, in Planck-
Einstein law, E=hν, the same energy changes linearly to its frequency.
It is immediately against this natural principle.
9. Equation E=Mc2 derived from m=mo[1-(ν/c)^2]^-1/2 by expanding
polynomial series has no scientific foundation. Nevertheless, this
equation is applied to explain energy emission from both nuclear
fission and fusion reaction, mutually opposite in philosophical sense.
You are correct in your criticism. Don't expect for the faithful of QM
to note your criticism.
The fact that is known about atoms, is that the nuclei are small
compared to the radii of the atoms. Atomic bonding occurs at this
greater radius.
The nucleus also contains almost all of the mass of the atom.
In basic quantum mechanics, there is no consideration for a repulsive
force that must exist between the electron shell where collisions
occur, and the mass of the nuclei.
QM cannot integrate it's concepts with the actual mechanics of a gas
in which the molecules are at high velocity and are in constant
collisions.
The nuclei remain centered within the relatively great volume of the
atom. Electrons cannot be forced into a nucleus either. They are
repulsed. Beta electrons are expelled from the nucleus at high
velocity, although they are supposedly negative particles.
The electrons of an atom, collect at a radius from the nuclei, and
form a spherical magnetic shell. This shell in absorbing energy,
absorbs mass. The magnetic field of the electron shells maitains
vibration through this magnetic field around the circumference of the
atom. This vibration has harmonics which causes the intervals of
emissions of energies near the ionization potential. The electron
shell always returns to it's equilibrium mass and releases this excess
mass as a photon.
Emission occurs at the intervals developed by the circular pulse.
Absorption is not dependent upon specific energy levels.
http://home.earthlink.net/~kdthrge/sub2.htm
K Deatherage
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I turn myself invisible???
- Next by Date: Quantum Gravity 122.0: How 1 + y - x relates to dy/dt = A + By + Cy^2
- Previous by thread: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
- Next by thread: Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
