sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• Quantum Gravity 146.7: Quaternion Maximizes "Discrimination", OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 146.7: Quaternion Maximizes "Discrimination", OsherD
• ~ ONEBIGCIRCLE IS BACK ~, OneBigCircle.org
• Re: HJ & AA kookgasm......Deco considers suicide....Film at 11......, John \"C\"
• Andro's Number Pattern Regcognition --- for the Mass Spectrum, hanson
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity Based on Absolute Motion., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity Based on Absolute Motion., tj Frazir
• Age of Matter and Time Since the Origin, Morpheal
  • Re: Age of Matter and Time Since the Origin, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Age of Matter and Time Since the Origin, srp
• A curious phenomenon responsible for the "singing" made..., Sam Wormley
• Re: Against Molecular Evolution, a Process of Abiogenesis, Jong Kim
• Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?, tj Frazir
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. charcoal for morons, tj Frazir
• Friction, kd
  • Re: Friction, Greg Neill
    • Re: Friction, kd
  • Re: Friction, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Friction, PD
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities", Erdd
• Where do the units come from?, coetzee . evert
  • Re: Where do the units come from?, Greg Neill
    • Re: Where do the units come from?, coetzee . evert
  • Re: Where do the units come from?, srp
  • Re: Where do the units come from?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Where do the units come from?, socratus
• Physics teacher in Brooklyn, NH
  • Re: Physics teacher in Brooklyn, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 148.0: Bohr's Original Model Abandoned Prematurely, and Multiverse Partitions Microscopic vs Macroscopic, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 148.0: Bohr's Original Model Abandoned Prematurely, and Multiverse Partitions Microscopic vs Macroscopic, chumley
• Quantum Gravity 147.1: More Re Spacetime May Be a Deformable Solid, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 147.0: Spacetime May Be a Deformable Solid, OsherD
• Kook Playoffs, The_Man
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/, malibu
• Negative Permeability, gyansorova
  • Re: Negative Permeability, Andy Resnick
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• FA Vintage Popular Microscope microscopy manual 1895, AlisEvans
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 826 May 30, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 826 May 30, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Andy Resnick
• NIST Neutrons and Z-Liquid Drop Theory, Douglas Eagleson
• Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, hetware
  • Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, hetware
      • Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, hetware
      • Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem, hetware
• Re: Peak-production price fix is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
• Re: WTC Towers: Lets burn another one down to steel, tj Frazir
  • Re: WTC Towers: Lets burn another one down to steel, hetware
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
  • Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
  • Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
  • Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
  • Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts., tj Frazir
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics", Erdd
• Is flat thinking all you need?, Clifford Nelson
  • Re: Is flat thinking all you need?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Is flat thinking all you need?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Quantum Gravity 146.6: The Dirac Spinor Field Is a Direct Sum of Two Quaternions, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 146.5 The "Fourth Part" of A Quaternion is Low Dependence, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 146.4: Quaternion Generalization of 3-Dimensional Riccati To Schrodinger's 3D Equation, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 146.3: Mapping of A Quaternion Representation of The Forces Described By 0, exp(t), exp(-t), OsherD
• "entropy" of a gas into an empty container, Dev Null
  • Re: "entropy" of a gas into an empty container, Andy Resnick
• Re: A Comprehensive Hypothesis of Abiogenesis, Jong Kim
  • Re: A Comprehensive Hypothesis of Abiogenesis, RetroProphet
  • Re: A Comprehensive Hypothesis of Abiogenesis, Jong Kim
• "General Relativity Examined", Erdd
• Question about entanglement, CWatters
  • Re: Question about entanglement, PD
    • Re: Question about entanglement, CWatters
      • Re: Question about entanglement, PD
      • Re: Question about entanglement, CWatters
      • Re: Question about entanglement, PD
      • Re: Question about entanglement, Edward Green
• Patentpalooza.com Rocks, Bunkerpod
• What if the Big Bang happened again?, flarosa
  • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, flarosa
      • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, Greg Neill
      • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, flarosa
      • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, Greg Neill
      • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, PD
      • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?, boson boss
  • Physically, what's special about 13.7 gigayears ago ?, Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Physically, what's special about 13.7 gigayears ago ?, socratus
      • Physically, there's nothing special about 13.7 gigayears ago., Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 146.2: A Quaternion Representation of The Forces Described By 0, exp(t), exp(-t), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 146.1: The Forces Described By 0, exp(t), exp(-t), OsherD
• Anybody Read Ian Lawrie's A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics?, hetware
  • Re: Anybody Read Ian Lawrie's A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics?, PD
    • Re: Anybody Read Ian Lawrie's A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics?, hetware
• Re: Auditory "Parallel Hz", Sam Wormley
• The Little Bubbles that Could, Sam Wormley
• Marching Single File Toward Qubits, Sam Wormley
• Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me., tj Frazir
  • Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me., Randy Poe
    • Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me., tj Frazir
    • Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me., tj Frazir
  • Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me., tj Frazir
      • Why be industrious ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Why be industrious ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Why eat ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Why be industrious ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me., tj Frazir
    • Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me., tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 146.0: y = 0, y = k exp(t), y = k exp(-t) As Infinitely Stable Causation Equations of the Universe, OsherD
• Pistol Shrimp, Boris Mohar
• Call for papers, abramo.pavan
• "Line of action of a force", hetware
  • Re: "Line of action of a force", Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: "Line of action of a force", hetware
      • Re: "Line of action of a force", Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: "Line of action of a force", hetware
      • Re: "Line of action of a force", Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: "Line of action of a force", hetware
      • Re: "Line of action of a force", Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: "Line of action of a force", Timo A. Nieminen
  • Message not available
    • Re: "Line of action of a force", hetware
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Line of action of a force", hanson
  • Re: "Line of action of a force", Richard Tobin
• Does physical displacement require force?, Mark Teller
  • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, CWatters
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
    • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
    • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, CWatters
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, CWatters
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, srp
  • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, boson boss
    • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Mark Teller
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Ben C
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Greg Neill
      • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, boson boss
  • Re: Does physical displacement require force?, Sue...
• Is force necessary for physical displacement?, Mark Teller
  • Re: Is force necessary for physical displacement?, Sam Wormley
• CIRCLET PRODUCT OF QUATERNIONS, Pekka T. Laakso
• Derivations of Hamilton's Canonical Equations, hetware
  • Re: Derivations of Hamilton's Canonical Equations, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Derivations of Hamilton's Canonical Equations, Eric Gisse
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 28, 2007, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Quantum Gravity 145.9: The Loudest Equations in the Universe, y = (+/-)k exp(t), y(t) = 0 all t,, OsherD
• Mitchell explain THIS :-), BioFreak
• Re: 8 lessons on shooting engineers, Michael Ejercito
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 8 lessons on shooting engineers, Michael Ejercito
• Relativistic correction of Coulumb Rules, Gieniu
• Communications through a Plasma, Harvey
  • Re: Communications through a Plasma, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Communications through a Plasma, Thomas Smid
• Quantum Gravity 145.8: Einstein Meant Symmetry/Beauty By Simplicity, Not Shortening or Replacing Equations, OsherD
• "The Einstein Hoax", Xao
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "The Einstein Hoax", Einsteinhoax
• Quantum Gravity 145.7: Sachdev of India On "Restoration of Causation", OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 145.6: All "Derivatives" Except Probable Influence/Causation Are "Entanglement/Miscodings", OsherD
• change in direction of the path of light, rAgAv
  • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Sue...
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
  • Re: change in direction of the path of light, OG
  • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Uncle Al
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Tee Lion
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Tee Lion
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Tee Lion
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
      • Cosmic Entropy and lesser gods., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Cosmic Entropy and lesser gods., tj Frazir
      • What good is your cosmology, Dr. Tao, if no one understands it ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Tee Lion
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, OG
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, OG
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Tee Lion
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
  • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • change in direction of the path of light, rAgAv
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Edward Green
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
      • Re: change in direction of the path of light, tj Frazir
    • Re: change in direction of the path of light, Androcles
• nonaco race 1 hour ago, tj Frazir
  • Tahliya, What did Branson and Prince Al think of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?, Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Tahliya, What did Branson and Prince Al think of M.V. Fearless ..., tj Frazir
      • Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?, Randy Poe
• Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, hetware
  • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, hetware
      • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 145.4: The Navier-Stokes Derivation and Causation of Generalized Derivatives, OsherD
• Re: Raising water to new heights, tj Frazir
• Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., hetware
  • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., hetware
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., hetware
  • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., proton
  • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Andy Resnick
    • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., hetware
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Andy Resnick
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., hetware
    • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Greg Hansen
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Andy Resnick
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., hetware
      • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., Andy Resnick
  • Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics., PD
• Re: Does the free fall of WTC 7 imply its' controlled demolition?, tj Frazir
• MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, W. Watson
  • Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, jimp
  • Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, schoenfeld . one
    • Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, W. Watson
      • Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, Uncle Al
    • Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air, Androcles
• tensor help, Matt Menge
  • Re: tensor help, shalayka
    • Re: tensor help, John C . Polasek
  • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
    • Re: tensor help, Matt Menge
      • Re: tensor help, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
  • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
    • Re: tensor help, Matt Menge
      • Re: tensor help, Greg Hansen
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Greg Hansen
      • Re: tensor help, hanson
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
      • Re: tensor help, hanson
      • Re: tensor help, glhansen@xxxxxxx
      • Re: tensor help, hanson
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
      • Re: tensor help, hanson
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
      • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
  • Re: tensor help, hetware
  • Re: tensor help, Tom Potter
    • Re: tensor help, hetware
    • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, guskz
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Edward Green
      • Re: tensor help, Tom Potter
      • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Gisse is an open book., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Gisse is an open book., Eric Gisse
      • A simple " tensor analysis " question for Gisse., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: A simple " tensor analysis " question for Gisse., Eric Gisse
      • Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question., guskz
      • Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question., Uncle Al
      • Re: Gisse is an open book., Edward Green
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Tom Potter
      • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • We are the plaything of the Gods, Tom Potter., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Gisse doesn't know what a chart is., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Gisse doesn't know what a chart is., Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, guskz
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, Tom Potter
      • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Eric Gisse
      • I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God., Eric Gisse
      • Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God., Eric Gisse
      • Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God., Tom Potter
      • Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God., Sam Wormley
      • Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
      • Re: tensor help, Tom Potter
      • Re: tensor help, Sam Wormley
      • Re: tensor help, hanson
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
      • Re: tensor help, hanson
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
      • Re: tensor help, hetware
      • Re: tensor help, Androcles
  • Re: tensor help, Tom Potter
  • Re: tensor help, Edward Green
    • Re: tensor help, Edward Green
  • Re: tensor help, math
  • Re: tensor help, hetware
• Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, Androcles
    • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, malibu
  • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, Uncle Al
    • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, Androcles
      • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, hanson
      • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, Androcles
  • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, Dan Drake
  • Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force, The_Man
• Higher dimensional electromagnetic propagation?, AmigaJoe
  • Re: Higher dimensional electromagnetic propagation?, Sue...
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean, Karl Krueger
  • Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean, Androcles
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Xao
• Conservation of angular momentum, Mark Teller
  • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Mark Teller
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, z
  • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Mark Teller
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Mark Teller
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
    • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
  • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, CWatters
  • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
    • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ditto
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ditto
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Androcles
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Igor
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, RP
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, RP
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ben C
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Peter
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ditto
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Ditto
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Greg Neill
      • Re: Conservation of angular momentum, blackhead
• Quantum Gravity 145.4: More Re Sonoluminescence and Auditory Information Processing Via Riccati, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 145.3: More Re Sonoluminescence and Auditory Information Processing Via Riccati, OsherD
• Help me about finance., Moneygirl
  • Re: Help me about finance., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Help me about finance., Rich
• Quantum Gravity 145.2: Sonoluminescence and Auditory Information Processing Via Riccati, OsherD
• Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Phineas T Puddleduck
  • Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast, Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Ignore the fuel, ignore the flames... " e = .5 * m * v^2 "., tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir says the sinking of the Titanic was an inside job., tj Frazir
• Merging Stars Create a New Class of Explosion, Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 May 07 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• one day in a galaxy far far away..., boson boss
  • Re: one day in a galaxy far far away..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: one day in a galaxy far far away..., The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: one day in a galaxy far far away..., boson boss
      • Re: one day in a galaxy far far away..., Rich
• What is the difference between the Thermoelectric and Photoelectric Effect?, V . Volin
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Tom Potter
    • Gisse's a troll with Tourette's., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Gisse's a troll with Tourette's., Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Y.Porat
    • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Tom Potter
      • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Y.Porat
      • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Tom Potter
      • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Y.Porat
      • Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?, Tom Potter
• Re: Question: Why Is Particle Decay Probabilistic?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 145.1: Quantum and Fuzzy Multivalued Logics Are Arguably Sound-Based, OsherD
• Rollercoaster physics, daemon95131
  • Re: Rollercoaster physics, b
    • Re: Rollercoaster physics, b
  • Re: Rollercoaster physics, Greg Neill
  • Re: Rollercoaster physics, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 145.0: Black Hole Sound-Light Relationships Have Strange Consequences, OsherD
• Making sense of Ax(BxC), hetware
  • Re: Making sense of Ax(BxC), Randy Poe
    • Re: Making sense of Ax(BxC), hetware
    • Re: Making sense of Ax(BxC), hetware
• Diamonds, how do they get their color?, astrobot1
  • Re: Diamonds, how do they get their color?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Diamonds, how do they get their color?, andy everett
• GPS Alternatives: Local Positioning Systems, Brad Stevens
• Energy produced by burning hydrogen, CWatters
  • Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen, Bruce Scott TOK
    • Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen, CWatters
      • Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen, Bruce Scott TOK
      • Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen, NotMyRealName
  • Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen, Greg Neill
  • Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen, Uncle Al
• Big Bang - only a consensus???, LeoK
  • Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???, LeoK
      • Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???, LeoK
      • Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???, Eric Gisse
• Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, hetware
  • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, hetware
      • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, hetware
  • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
    • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, hetware
      • Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• consulting work, Martin
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Sam Wormley
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Don Stockbauer
    • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, The Ghost In The Machine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Sam Wormley
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Raktizer Omheit
    • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Raktizer Omheit
    • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Ian Parker
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
  • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
    • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
      • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
      • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
      • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
      • Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money, tj Frazir
• Help plz..coeffecient of friciton question, 5h4r4n . 4
  • Re: Help plz..coeffecient of friciton question, PD
• Question about pressure in a balloon, Tim
  • Re: Question about pressure in a balloon, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Question about pressure in a balloon, boson boss
  • Re: Question about pressure in a balloon, Andy Resnick
  • Re: Question about pressure in a balloon, CWatters
• Gravity Essay Competition, Matej Pavsic
  • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, boson boss
    • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, Matej Pavsic
      • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, Uncle Al
      • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, mk . poon
      • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, Matej Pavsic
  • Re: Gravity Essay Competition, Douglas Eagleson
• Feynman: Photons - Corpuscles of Light, hetware
  • Re: Feynman: Photons - Corpuscles of Light, hetware
• Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?, Jimmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?, Jimmer
    • Re: Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?, Sam Wormley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?, Jimmer
• Non-Locality Maybe, Jimmer
  • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Tomoko Kanazawa
  • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Jimmer
      • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Jimmer
      • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Jimmer
      • Re: Non-Locality Maybe, Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized., Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized., Eric Gisse
    • Gisse, you can't troll us if you can't construct a reply., Jeff…Relf
  • Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized., Eric Gisse
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 825 May 23, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley
• Physical balance, vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Physical balance, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Physical balance, Androcles
  • Re: Physical balance, Andy Resnick
• Drift velocity, vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Drift velocity, Bruce Scott TOK
  • Re: Drift velocity, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Drift velocity, operator jay
    • Re: Drift velocity, Edward Green
• Electromagnetic induction, vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Electromagnetic induction, Androcles
  • Re: Electromagnetic induction, Sue...
• Shut Up! I'm Driving, Sam Wormley
• New Postdoctoral Fellowship Positions at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Neutron Scattering, Nonlinear Dynamics, Mass Spec, Radiation Detection, Planetary Atmosphere X-ray Emission, bradley.parish@xxxxxxxx
• On the Einstein-de Haas and Barnett Effects, srp
• On the Magnetostatic Inverse Cube Law and Magnetic Monopoles, srp
• Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
  • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
    • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
    • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
    • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
    • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
      • Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments, Jimmer
• Best Source for Garmin, Magellan GPS Cutting-Edge Systems with Descriptions, Specifications, Pictures and FAQ, gpsmagellan
• "Is String Theory Justified?", Xao
• Vladimir Arnold exercise, gregwayne
• What is boiling in this situation...?, Kenneth
  • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Phineas T Puddleduck
    • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Kenneth
      • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Kenneth
      • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Tomoko Kanazawa
      • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: What is boiling in this situation...?, Phineas T Puddleduck
• Help a liberal arts graduate out, powelljm2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out, Greg Neill
  • Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out, karandash2000
    • Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out, Greg Neill
• Re: One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc., tj Frazir
  • Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ?, Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ?, Eric Gisse
      • There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK "., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK "., Eric Gisse
      • Re: There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK "., Eric Gisse
      • Eric_Gisse, Your headers are off., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Eric_Gisse, Your headers are off., Eric Gisse
      • Standards are tools., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Standards are tools., Eric Gisse
      • My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money., Eric Gisse
      • Re: My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money., satansgoats
    • Re: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ?, tj Frazir
• Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Tom Potter
    • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Rich
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Tom Potter
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Tom Potter
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, The_Man
    • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, The_Man
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Tom Potter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Tom Potter
    • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Tom Potter
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?, Eric Gisse
• Re: DOES GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION EXIST?, Uncle Al
• Re: China and India race towards using Plasma Physics to generate abundance of power from nuclear fusion (India Daily), Uncle Al
  • Re: China and India race towards using Plasma Physics to generate abundance of power from nuclear fusion (India Daily), Androcles
• The mystery of Inertia, proton
  • Re: The mystery of Inertia, Uncle Al
    • Re: The mystery of Inertia, Androcles
      • Re: The mystery of Inertia, I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
  • Re: The mystery of Inertia, Andy Resnick
  • Re: The mystery of Inertia, malibu
  • Re: The mystery of Inertia, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: The mystery of Inertia, Sam Wormley
      • Gravity is the flip-side of net inertia., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: The mystery of Inertia, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The mystery of Inertia, RP
    • Re: The mystery of Inertia, THE_ONE
      • Re: The mystery of Inertia, RP
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe", Xao
• difference between "unit principle normal vector" and "unit normal vector", Bill
  • Re: difference between "unit principle normal vector" and "unit normal vector", Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 144.0: A Zoo of Probable Causation/Influences In Time, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 144.0: A Zoo of Probable Causation/Influences In Time, harry
• Quantum Gravity 143.2: Dual Coding Theory of Alan Paivio, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 143.2: Dual Coding Theory of Alan Paivio, harry
• Quantum Gravity 143.1: How Do We Know That Advanced Life Has Dual Processing?, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 143.1: How Do We Know That Advanced Life Has Dual Processing?, harry
• Quantum Gravity 143.0: Sound-Light Relationships Theoretically Indicate That Black Holes Have Unbounded Internal Velocities and Accelerations, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 143.0: Sound-Light Relationships Theoretically Indicate That Black Holes Have Unbounded Internal Velocities and Accelerations, harry
• Re: What do you want me to do, Gisse ? grow younger ?, Eric Gisse
  • Homeless, I'd be twice as alive as I am now., Jeff…Relf
    • Message not available
      • Homelessness'd be what I needed, not what I wanted., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Homelessness'd be what I needed, not what I wanted., Eric Gisse
      • You're a wart on the ass of Usenet, Gisse, not its mouthpiece., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: You're a wart on the ass of Usenet, Gisse, not its mouthpiece., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Homeless, I'd be twice as alive as I am now., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Winter in Seattle is like spring, with flowers everywhere., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Winter in Seattle is like spring, with flowers everywhere., Eric Gisse
      • It's hard to get into jail these days., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: It's hard to get into jail these days., Randy Poe
      • Re: It's hard to get into jail these days., Tom Potter
      • Re: It's hard to get into jail these days., Tom Potter
      • Who's getting raped here ?, Jeff…Relf
      • There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders., Rich
      • Re: There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders., Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Advice please - how can I deal with this noise?, Boris Mohar
• Newbie, lequynhphuong
  • Re: Newbie, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Newbie, Uncle Al
    • Re: Newbie, BioFreak
  • Re: Newbie, Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 85.4: Sound (Acoustics) Related To Electromagnetism, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 85.4: Sound (Acoustics) Related To Electromagnetism, harry
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 85.4: Sound (Acoustics) Related To Electromagnetism, naemr999
• Quantum Gravity 142.9: Causation As Instantaneous Rate of Change of Code and q-calculus, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 142.9: Causation As Instantaneous Rate of Change of Code and q-calculus, harry
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 21, 2007, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Quantum Gravity 142.8: Infinite Matrices Aren't The Maximum Proximity Limit of Matrices, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 142.8: Infinite Matrices Aren't The Maximum Proximity Limit of Matrices, harry
• Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury., Sam Wormley
  • Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury., Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury., Sam Wormley
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
  • If you ( Frazir ) don't beg me, I won't beg you., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: If you ( Frazir ) don't beg me, I won't beg you., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
    • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Phineas T Puddleduck
    • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Mitchell Jones
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Mitchell Jones
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Mitchell Jones
      • U.S. English is the language of _ Global _ trade., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: U.S. English is the language of _ Global _ trade., tj Frazir
      • All global players speak U.S. English., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: All global players speak U.S. English., tj Frazir
      • Re: All global players speak U.S. English., tj Frazir
      • Live life on the edge., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: All global players speak U.S. English., Randy Poe
      • Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, tj Frazir
      • Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom., Randy Poe
      • Paying 430 dollars per month for shared-housing is nuts., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom., tj Frazir
      • Re: Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Does Frazir really need gigadollars or was that just his fate ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Does Frazir really need gigadollars or was that just his fate ?, tj Frazir
      • I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir., Eric Gisse
      • Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir., tj Frazir
      • Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir., tj Frazir
      • Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir., tj Frazir
      • I don't want the bank's money., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: I don't want the bank's money., tj Frazir
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?, Randy Poe
      • Frazir, what can you do for us morons ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: All global players speak U.S. English., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Message not available
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., Mitchell Jones
      • Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " )., tj Frazir
      • Which nym is Bill Gates ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Which nym is Bill Gates ?, tj Frazir
      • 3-D goggles are what I'd choose., Jeff…Relf
      • Don't promise people money that won't show, it f_cks them up., Jeff…Relf
    • Tor Olav Trøim, born in 1963., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Tor Olav Trøim, born in 1963., tj Frazir
      • Re: Tor Olav Trøim, born in 1963., tj Frazir
• Comms link for Jupiter's moon Io, Harvey
  • Re: Comms link for Jupiter's moon Io, CWatters
• Quantum Gravity 1427: Retyping: Nearest Neighbor Graphs and Matrices in Computers, Cryptography, Computational Complexity, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 1427: Retyping: Nearest Neighbor Graphs and Matrices in Computers, Cryptography, Computational Complexity, kunzmilan
• Quantum Gravity 1427: Nearest Neighbor Graphs and Matrices in Computers, Cryptography, Computational Complexity, OsherD
• Explaining what isn't physics, scientist
  • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, mmeron
    • Not all " opinions " are equal., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Shubee
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, T Wake
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Shubee
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Shubee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, boson boss
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Igor
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Igor
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Shubee
      • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Sam Wormley
  • Physics is about observations., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Physics is about observations., Shubee
      • Shubee doesn't care about his/our future., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Shubee doesn't care about his/our future., T Wake
    • Re: Physics is about observations., boson boss
      • Nothing truly changed, no genuine choices were made., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Physics is about observations., The_Man
  • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Eric Gisse
    • Black holes aren't true physics, according to Gisse., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Black holes aren't true physics, according to Gisse., Eric Gisse
      • If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?, Eric Gisse
      • Gisse the troll cannot., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Gisse the troll cannot., Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Gisse the troll cannot., Eric Gisse
      • Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds )., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds )., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds )., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds )., Eric Gisse
      • A true event horizon has never, could never exist., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: A true event horizon has never, could never exist., Eric Gisse
      • Why can't you quote like this, Mr. high school Drop-Out ?, Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Why can't you quote like this, Mr. high school Drop-Out ?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?, T Wake
      • Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?, T Wake
  • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Androcles
    • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, BioFreak
  • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, BioFreak
  • Re: Explaining what isn't physics, Andy Resnick
• Set theory with urelements and elementary particles, adib . jebara
• silicon carbide stiffness matrix, Andrea Mazzolari
• geometrized units and numerical calculation, Barrow
  • Re: geometrized units and numerical calculation, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Test, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 142.6: Nearest Neighbor and Conditional Statistics, OsherD
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot., tj Frazir
  • Con artist says: " Take my word on it. "., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: Con artist says: " Take my word on it. "., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot., hanson
• Re: The Tongass thing., tj Frazir
• Re: Producing hydrogen with water and a little metal bullshit, tj Frazir
• Re: WARNING TO NEW ZEALAND _ SLOSHING TSUNAMIS, T Wake
  • e-gold, a high-privacy payment system, got indicted., Jeff…Relf
    • Re: e-gold, a high-privacy payment system, got indicted., Eric Gisse
      • Kick rocks, Gisse., Jeff…Relf
      • Re: Kick rocks, Gisse., Eric Gisse
• It's About Time: The Concept of Time, Cosmology and the Latest Theory about Time., physics_Made_Easy
• Complete electronic solution manuals in PDF! Get it in hours!, deltabooks
  • Re: Complete electronic solution manuals in PDF! Get it in hours!, mobeengr8
• Re: We Super-Idiots., tj Frazir
  • Re: We Super-Idiots., T Wake
• Quantum Gravity 142.5: Eigenvalue Invariants As Maximum-Proximity Elements, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 142.5: Eigenvalue Invariants As Maximum-Proximity Elements, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 142.4: Matrix Trace As Maximum Proximity Sum, OsherD
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Iter
• climate change news reporting, boson boss
• galactic evolution, boson boss
  • Re: galactic evolution, Sam Wormley
    • Re: galactic evolution, boson boss