sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Age of Matter and Time Since the Origin
  • From: srp
• Re: tensor help
  • From: guskz
• Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question.
  • From: guskz
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 146.7: Quaternion Maximizes "Discrimination"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 146.7: Quaternion Maximizes "Discrimination"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• ~ ONEBIGCIRCLE IS BACK ~
  • From: OneBigCircle.org
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: HJ & AA kookgasm......Deco considers suicide....Film at 11......
  • From: John \"C\"
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hanson
• Andro's Number Pattern Regcognition --- for the Mass Spectrum
  • From: hanson
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Where do the units come from?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Is flat thinking all you need?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Quantum Gravity 148.0: Bohr's Original Model Abandoned Prematurely, and Multiverse Partitions Microscopic vs Macroscopic
  • From: chumley
• Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why be industrious ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age of Matter and Time Since the Origin
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why eat ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gisse is an open book.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Friction
  • From: PD
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity Based on Absolute Motion.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity Based on Absolute Motion.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Age of Matter and Time Since the Origin
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Friction
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• A curious phenomenon responsible for the "singing" made...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Against Molecular Evolution, a Process of Abiogenesis
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Where do the units come from?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why be industrious ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics teacher in Brooklyn
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. charcoal for morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Where do the units come from?
  • From: coetzee . evert
• Re: Where do the units come from?
  • From: srp
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Friction
  • From: kd
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
• Re: Friction
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 826 May 30, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Negative Permeability
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Friction
  • From: kd
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Erdd
• Re: A Comprehensive Hypothesis of Abiogenesis
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: malibu
• Re: Where do the units come from?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Where do the units come from?
  • From: coetzee . evert
• Physics teacher in Brooklyn
  • From: NH
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 148.0: Bohr's Original Model Abandoned Prematurely, and Multiverse Partitions Microscopic vs Macroscopic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Quantum Gravity 147.1: More Re Spacetime May Be a Deformable Solid
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 147.0: Spacetime May Be a Deformable Solid
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Kook Playoffs
  • From: The_Man
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS -- 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about entanglement
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Negative Permeability
  • From: gyansorova
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why be industrious ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: hetware
• Re: Question about entanglement
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• FA Vintage Popular Microscope microscopy manual 1895
  • From: AlisEvans
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 826 May 30, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• NIST Neutrons and Z-Liquid Drop Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Virtual Work /w Unequal-Arm Ballance Problem
  • From: hetware
• Re: Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Peak-production price fix is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hanson
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hanson
• Re: Question about entanglement
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: hetware
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hanson
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Question about entanglement
  • From: PD
• Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WTC Towers: Lets burn another one down to steel
  • From: hetware
• Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: WTC Towers: Lets burn another one down to steel
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Peak-Oil is fact. Kooks hate facts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Erdd
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: I Was A Teenage Queerwolf
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about entanglement
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: hetware
• Re: Is flat thinking all you need?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: RP
• Re: Anybody Read Ian Lawrie's A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics?
  • From: hetware
• Is flat thinking all you need?
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Quantum Gravity 146.6: The Dirac Spinor Field Is a Direct Sum of Two Quaternions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: hetware
• Quantum Gravity 146.5 The "Fourth Part" of A Quaternion is Low Dependence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: High gamma energy source
  • From: Jaga
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: THE_ONE
• Legislators hope to micromanage, yet fail miserably every time.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Quantum Gravity 146.4: Quaternion Generalization of 3-Dimensional Riccati To Schrodinger's 3D Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Quantum Gravity 146.3: Mapping of A Quaternion Representation of The Forces Described By 0, exp(t), exp(-t)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Physically, there's nothing special about 13.7 gigayears ago.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: z
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Tee Lion
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: OG
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: OG
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: A Comprehensive Hypothesis of Abiogenesis
  • From: RetroProphet
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Tee Lion
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: "entropy" of a gas into an empty container
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ditto
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anybody Read Ian Lawrie's A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about entanglement
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• "entropy" of a gas into an empty container
  • From: Dev Null
• Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: hanson
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hanson
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tensor help
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: flarosa
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: flarosa
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A Comprehensive Hypothesis of Abiogenesis
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Erdd
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Mark Teller
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Physically, what's special about 13.7 gigayears ago ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Mark Teller
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Question about entanglement
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Physically, what's special about 13.7 gigayears ago ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• What good is your cosmology, Dr. Tao, if no one understands it ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Can I see some pictures of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Patentpalooza.com Rocks
  • From: Bunkerpod
• Frazir, I enjoy your stories, and that's enough for me.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What if the Big Bang happened again?
  • From: flarosa
• Quantum Gravity 146.2: A Quaternion Representation of The Forces Described By 0, exp(t), exp(-t)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 146.1: The Forces Described By 0, exp(t), exp(-t)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: hetware
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gisse doesn't know what a chart is.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Anybody Read Ian Lawrie's A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics?
  • From: hetware
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: Cosmic Entropy and lesser gods.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Auditory "Parallel Hz"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Gisse doesn't know what a chart is.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• The Little Bubbles that Could
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Marching Single File Toward Qubits
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Frazir, Ask my professor if you doubt me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Cosmic Entropy and lesser gods.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Tahliya, What did Branson and Prince Al think of M.V. Fearless ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Quantum Gravity 146.0: y = 0, y = k exp(t), y = k exp(-t) As Infinitely Stable Causation Equations of the Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tensor help
  • From: math
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Pistol Shrimp
  • From: Boris Mohar
• We are the plaything of the Gods, Tom Potter.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: blackhead
• Gisse fails the simple " tensor analysis " question.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Tee Lion
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ditto
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Call for papers
  • From: abramo.pavan
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: hetware
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Derivations of Hamilton's Canonical Equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Derivations of Hamilton's Canonical Equations
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple " tensor analysis " question for Gisse.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ditto
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ditto
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: "Line of action of a force"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Line of action of a force"
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hanson
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: srp
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Einsteinhoax
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Is force necessary for physical displacement?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Does physical displacement require force?
  • From: Mark Teller
• Is force necessary for physical displacement?
  • From: Mark Teller
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Mark Teller
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• CIRCLET PRODUCT OF QUATERNIONS
  • From: Pekka T. Laakso
• Derivations of Hamilton's Canonical Equations
  • From: hetware
• A simple " tensor analysis " question for Gisse.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Gisse is an open book.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Y.Porat
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 28, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Communications through a Plasma
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Communications through a Plasma
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: Matej Pavsic
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: hetware
• Gisse is an open book.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 145.9: The Loudest Equations in the Universe, y = (+/-)k exp(t), y(t) = 0 all t,
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• I'm God to my prisoners, and a prisoner to my God.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: hanson
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: RP
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Mitchell explain THIS :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: 8 lessons on shooting engineers
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Re: 8 lessons on shooting engineers
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Tahliya, What did Branson and Prince Al think of M.V. Fearless Johnny ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Relativistic correction of Coulumb Rules
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: RP
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Tee Lion
• Communications through a Plasma
  • From: Harvey
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 145.8: Einstein Meant Symmetry/Beauty By Simplicity, Not Shortening or Replacing Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Tee Lion
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: Androcles
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Xao
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 145.7: Sachdev of India On "Restoration of Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tensor help
  • From: guskz
• Quantum Gravity 145.6: All "Derivatives" Except Probable Influence/Causation Are "Entanglement/Miscodings"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: OG
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: change in direction of the path of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• change in direction of the path of light
  • From: rAgAv
• change in direction of the path of light
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: I don't want the bank's money.
  • From: tj Frazir
• nonaco race 1 hour ago
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Edward Green
• Why no pentagon crystal lattices?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 145.4: The Navier-Stokes Derivation and Causation of Generalized Derivatives
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Diamonds, how do they get their color?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: hetware
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: proton
• Re: Gisse's a troll with Tourette's.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Raising water to new heights
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Goldstein's Classical Mechanics.
  • From: hetware
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tensor help
  • From: hetware
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the free fall of WTC 7 imply its' controlled demolition?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Who's getting raped here ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: jimp
• Gisse's a troll with Tourette's.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• MythBusters and Shooting Bullets in the Air
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I don't want the bank's money.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tensor help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tensor help
  • From: shalayka
• tensor help
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money.
  • From: satansgoats
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Peter
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Debate: Was Aristotle Correct: Re: A Falling Force
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Higher dimensional electromagnetic propagation?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help me about finance.
  • From: Rich
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: LeoK
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: hetware
• Higher dimensional electromagnetic propagation?
  • From: AmigaJoe
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Anchoring a large pontoon in the open ocean
  • From: Karl Krueger
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: mk . poon
• Re: one day in a galaxy far far away...
  • From: Rich
• Re: Help me about finance.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Making sense of Ax(BxC)
  • From: hetware
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Xao
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Ben C
• Re: one day in a galaxy far far away...
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Mark Teller
• Re: Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Conservation of angular momentum
  • From: Mark Teller
• Re: I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I don't ask anything of Mr. Frazir.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: one day in a galaxy far far away...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 145.4: More Re Sonoluminescence and Auditory Information Processing Via Riccati
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 145.3: More Re Sonoluminescence and Auditory Information Processing Via Riccati
  • From: OsherD
• Help me about finance.
  • From: Moneygirl
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: RP
• Quantum Gravity 145.2: Sonoluminescence and Auditory Information Processing Via Riccati
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Violent Past: Young sun withstood a supernova blast
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does Frazir really need gigadollars or was that just his fate ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ignore the fuel, ignore the flames... " e = .5 * m * v^2 ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir says the sinking of the Titanic was an inside job.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: NotMyRealName
• Merging Stars Create a New Class of Explosion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• My megadollar+ lien taught me the worthlessness of money.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: LeoK
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: one day in a galaxy far far away...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• one day in a galaxy far far away...
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Complete electronic solution manuals in PDF! Get it in hours!
  • From: mobeengr8
• Re: Nazi Gas sings: Never Again Happened!
  • From: hanson
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Rollercoaster physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Diamonds, how do they get their color?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Rollercoaster physics
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What is the difference between the Thermoelectric and Photoelectric Effect?
  • From: V . Volin
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question: Why Is Particle Decay Probabilistic?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gas sings: Never Again Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Making sense of Ax(BxC)
  • From: hetware
• Re: Rollercoaster physics
  • From: b
• Re: Rollercoaster physics
  • From: b
• Re: Standards are tools.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Standards are tools.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Does Frazir really need gigadollars or was that just his fate ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Eric_Gisse, Your headers are off.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 145.1: Quantum and Fuzzy Multivalued Logics Are Arguably Sound-Based
  • From: OsherD
• Rollercoaster physics
  • From: daemon95131
• Quantum Gravity 145.0: Black Hole Sound-Light Relationships Have Strange Consequences
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Making sense of Ax(BxC)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Frazir, what can you do for us morons ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Making sense of Ax(BxC)
  • From: hetware
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Diamonds, how do they get their color?
  • From: astrobot1
• GPS Alternatives: Local Positioning Systems
  • From: Brad Stevens
• Re: Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Paying 430 dollars per month for shared-housing is nuts.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nazi Gas sings: Never Again Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Free time is all that matters to me... Freedom.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Nazi Gas sings: Never Again Happened!
  • From: hanson
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: hetware
• Energy produced by burning hydrogen
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Big Bang - only a consensus???
  • From: LeoK
• Invariant Spacetime Interval:Vector or Magnitude?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Help plz..coeffecient of friciton question
  • From: PD
• consulting work
  • From: Martin
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: UFOs cannot be extrarerrestrial - SET is a waste of money
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Drift velocity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: Matej Pavsic
• Re: Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: CWatters
• Help plz..coeffecient of friciton question
  • From: 5h4r4n . 4
• Re: Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: All global players speak U.S. English.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Physical balance
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Feynman: Photons - Corpuscles of Light
  • From: hetware
• Re: Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Iter
• Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: Tim
• Gravity Essay Competition
  • From: Matej Pavsic
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Feynman: Photons - Corpuscles of Light
  • From: hetware
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Non-Local Hidden Variables, why not?
  • From: Jimmer
• Non-Locality Maybe
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders.
  • From: Rich
• Re: Physical balance
  • From: Androcles
• Gisse, you can't troll us if you can't construct a reply.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Electromagnetic induction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electromagnetic induction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: joebobjones
• Re: There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• There aren't enough facilities/staff to handle offenders.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 825 May 23, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Drift velocity
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Drift velocity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical balance
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Drift velocity
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Physical balance
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Drift velocity
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Electromagnetic induction
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Shut Up! I'm Driving
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Rich
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• New Postdoctoral Fellowship Positions at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Neutron Scattering, Nonlinear Dynamics, Mass Spec, Radiation Detection, Planetary Atmosphere X-ray Emission
  • From: bradley.parish@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: It's hard to get into jail these days.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: It's hard to get into jail these days.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• On the Einstein-de Haas and Barnett Effects
  • From: srp
• On the Magnetostatic Inverse Cube Law and Magnetic Monopoles
  • From: srp
• Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out
  • From: karandash2000
• Re: Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It's hard to get into jail these days.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Past Time Alteration Experiments
  • From: Jimmer
• Best Source for Garmin, Magellan GPS Cutting-Edge Systems with Descriptions, Specifications, Pictures and FAQ
  • From: gpsmagellan
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Xao
• Randy_Poe, Where's your picture ( or web site ) ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: All global players speak U.S. English.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Eric_Gisse, Your headers are off.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• 3-D goggles are what I'd choose.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Live life on the edge.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Which nym is Bill Gates ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: All global players speak U.S. English.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: All global players speak U.S. English.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 143.0: Sound-Light Relationships Theoretically Indicate That Black Holes Have Unbounded Internal Velocities and Accelerations
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 144.0: A Zoo of Probable Causation/Influences In Time
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 143.2: Dual Coding Theory of Alan Paivio
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 143.1: How Do We Know That Advanced Life Has Dual Processing?
  • From: harry
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• It's hard to get into jail these days.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Winter in Seattle is like spring, with flowers everywhere.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Kenneth
• Vladimir Arnold exercise
  • From: gregwayne
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Kenneth
• Re: What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• What is boiling in this situation...?
  • From: Kenneth
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: OG
• Gravity is the flip-side of net inertia.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: postman
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Help a liberal arts graduate out
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: malibu
• Help a liberal arts graduate out
  • From: powelljm2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Winter in Seattle is like spring, with flowers everywhere.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Newbie
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 85.4: Sound (Acoustics) Related To Electromagnetism
  • From: naemr999
• Re: Homeless, I'd be twice as alive as I am now.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: blackhead
• Course offerings--Is Potter Qualified to take any of them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: China and India race towards using Plasma Physics to generate abundance of power from nuclear fusion (India Daily)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mystery of Inertia
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: DOES GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION EXIST?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: China and India race towards using Plasma Physics to generate abundance of power from nuclear fusion (India Daily)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• The mystery of Inertia
  • From: proton
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: malibu
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: blackhead
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Xao
• Re: You're a wart on the ass of Usenet, Gisse, not its mouthpiece.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• You're a wart on the ass of Usenet, Gisse, not its mouthpiece.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: difference between "unit principle normal vector" and "unit normal vector"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Homelessness'd be what I needed, not what I wanted.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• difference between "unit principle normal vector" and "unit normal vector"
  • From: Bill
• Homelessness'd be what I needed, not what I wanted.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 144.0: A Zoo of Probable Causation/Influences In Time
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 85.4: Sound (Acoustics) Related To Electromagnetism
  • From: harry
• Quantum Gravity 143.2: Dual Coding Theory of Alan Paivio
  • From: OsherD
• Which nym is Bill Gates ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 143.1: How Do We Know That Advanced Life Has Dual Processing?
  • From: OsherD
• All global players speak U.S. English.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Homeless, I'd be twice as alive as I am now.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: U.S. English is the language of _ Global _ trade.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Don't promise people money that won't show, it f_cks them up.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 143.0: Sound-Light Relationships Theoretically Indicate That Black Holes Have Unbounded Internal Velocities and Accelerations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Producing hydrogen with water and a little metal
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Producing hydrogen with water and a little metal
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Producing hydrogen with water and a little metal
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What do you want me to do, Gisse ? grow younger ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newbie
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Trend Finder
• Re: Newbie
  • From: Uncle Al
• I use a PC, not a TV, because PCs are _ Personal _ .
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Newbie
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Advice please - how can I deal with this noise?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• U.S. English is the language of _ Global _ trade.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Florian
• Newbie
  • From: lequynhphuong
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Quantum Gravity 85.4: Sound (Acoustics) Related To Electromagnetism
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 141.0: Sound vs Light in Astrophysics and Psychology
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.8: Infinite Matrices Aren't The Maximum Proximity Limit of Matrices
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.0: Tensors As Proximity-Dependent (Hence PI-Dependent) Objects
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.1: More Re PI As Proximity
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.2: Why Einstein Field Equations Are Not Multiplicative (Proximity Isn't Multiplicative)
  • From: harry
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.9: Causation As Instantaneous Rate of Change of Code and q-calculus
  • From: harry
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: rojodraco
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Tor Olav Trøim, born in 1963.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tor Olav Trøim, born in 1963.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: If you ( Frazir ) don't beg me, I won't beg you.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: blackhead
• Quantum Gravity 142.9: Causation As Instantaneous Rate of Change of Code and q-calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 21, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Tor Olav Trøim, born in 1963.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: BradGuth
• Quantum Gravity 142.8: Infinite Matrices Aren't The Maximum Proximity Limit of Matrices
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 1427: Retyping: Nearest Neighbor Graphs and Matrices in Computers, Cryptography, Computational Complexity
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Why can't you quote like this, Mr. high school Drop-Out ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Why can't you quote like this, Mr. high school Drop-Out ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A true event horizon has never, could never exist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• A true event horizon has never, could never exist.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: geometrized units and numerical calculation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• If you ( Frazir ) don't beg me, I won't beg you.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Relativistic escape energies ( and speeds ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gisse the troll cannot.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Frazir has some foolish theories ( call them " Frazir Facts " ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics is about observations.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Mind Control Weapons and Directed Energy Weapons
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Mind Control Weapons and Directed Energy Weapons
  • From: soleilmavis
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Shubee doesn't care about his/our future.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Gisse the troll cannot.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Gisse the troll cannot.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: OG
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Florian
• Re: Muslim Thermonuclear Ablation Never Happened!
  • From: hanson
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Comms link for Jupiter's moon Io
  • From: CWatters
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: postman
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: malibu
• Comms link for Jupiter's moon Io
  • From: Harvey
• If a true event horizon is not testable, how is it physics ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Nothing truly changed, no genuine choices were made.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Rich
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: boson boss
• Shubee doesn't care about his/our future.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Physics is about observations.
  • From: boson boss
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: hanson
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: GSS
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 1427: Retyping: Nearest Neighbor Graphs and Matrices in Computers, Cryptography, Computational Complexity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 1427: Nearest Neighbor Graphs and Matrices in Computers, Cryptography, Computational Complexity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics is about observations.
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Shubee
• Re: galactic evolution
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Black holes aren't true physics, according to Gisse.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Frazir lives in Disneyland 24/7, unaffected by reality.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Androcles
• Black holes aren't true physics, according to Gisse.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Not all " opinions " are equal.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Physics is about observations.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: CWatters
• Explaining what isn't physics
  • From: scientist
• Set theory with urelements and elementary particles
  • From: adib . jebara
• silicon carbide stiffness matrix
  • From: Andrea Mazzolari
• geometrized units and numerical calculation
  • From: Barrow
• Test
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 142.6: Nearest Neighbor and Conditional Statistics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galactic evolution
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Kick rocks, Gisse.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Con artist says: " Take my word on it. ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Con artist says: " Take my word on it. ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Kick rocks, Gisse.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: e-gold, a high-privacy payment system, got indicted.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Frazir's incredible talent for begging ( not giving ).
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Super-F_ck, Can you only beg ? don't have the 9 kilodollars ?
  • From: T Wake
• We know Frazir can beg/con. We know he can't pay a dime.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir's incredible talent for begging ( not giving ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Frazir's incredible talent for begging ( not giving ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• e-gold, a high-privacy payment system, got indicted.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Muslim Thermonuclear Ablation Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Super-F_ck, Can you only beg ? don't have the 9 kilodollars ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Tongass thing.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Producing hydrogen with water and a little metal bullshit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Muslim Thermonuclear Ablation Never Happened!
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Frazir conned the f_ck out of me, I get conned a lot.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: WARNING TO NEW ZEALAND _ SLOSHING TSUNAMIS
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• It's About Time: The Concept of Time, Cosmology and the Latest Theory about Time.
  • From: physics_Made_Easy
• Re: Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir's incredible talent for begging ( not giving ).
  • From: T Wake
• Complete electronic solution manuals in PDF! Get it in hours!
  • From: deltabooks
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Frazir is yet another vicious con artist.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: hanson
• Re: Frazir's incredible talent for begging ( not giving ).
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Frazir's incredible talent for begging ( not giving ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Muslim Thermonuclear Ablation Never Happened!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Super-F_ck, Can you only beg ? don't have the 9 kilodollars ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: We Super-Idiots.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Super-F_ck, Can you only beg ? don't have the 9 kilodollars ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Super-F_ck, Can you only beg ? don't have the 9 kilodollars ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: We Super-Idiots.
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: We Super-Idiots.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.5: Eigenvalue Invariants As Maximum-Proximity Elements
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 142.5: Eigenvalue Invariants As Maximum-Proximity Elements
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: RP
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: BioFreak
• Quantum Gravity 142.4: Matrix Trace As Maximum Proximity Sum
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Iter
• Re: Why do objects move?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• climate change news reporting
  • From: boson boss
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• galactic evolution
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• 471 People using 229 rigs have visited Sci.Physics in the last 6.4 Days.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: High gamma energy source
  • From: mmeron
• Quantum Conspiracy Theory and Kaluza Klein
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: racism
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quantum Gravity 142.3: Why Maxwell Equations Are Not Multiplicative
  • From: harry
• Re: racism
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 142.3: Why Maxwell Equations Are Not Multiplicative
  • From: OsherD
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Quantum Gravity 142.2: Why Einstein Field Equations Are Not Multiplicative (Proximity Isn't Multiplicative)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 142.1: More Re PI As Proximity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 142.0: Tensors As Proximity-Dependent (Hence PI-Dependent) Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: ²²Na
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• The Tongass thing.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Super-F_ck, Can you only beg ? don't have the 9 kilodollars ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: tj Frazir
• We Super-Idiots.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The cosmos is a 5-D ( i.e. PseudoEntropy_Time_Space ) rock.
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Producing hydrogen with water and a little metal
  • From: tj Frazir
• What is the shape of an electron?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Rich
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hetware
• Re: The cosmos is a 5-D ( i.e. PseudoEntropy_Time_Space ) rock.
  • From: T Wake
• The cosmos is a 5-D ( i.e. PseudoEntropy_Time_Space ) rock.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Best Car Air conditioners from Leading Manufacturers & Suppliers !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: Androcles
• Frazir's money addict, in need of treatment.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Free Energy
  • From: Gieniu
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: OG
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: OG
• My lack of understanding of the Big Bang Theory
  • From: postman
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: Uncle Al
• Split Faraday's Law -- the scientific concept of the Declaration gave me the strength to speak
  • From: iiiiieee
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Xao
• Re: Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: tj Frazir
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Xao
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Xao
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Hot Ice Planet???
  • From: Rich
• Re: Hot Ice Planet???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: need a cheap and easy air pump design
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hawking and information paradox
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Physicists confirm existence of polariton condensate
  • From: Michael Asherman
• Hawking and information paradox
  • From: lvirden
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer
• The physics in your fork
  • From: Sam Wormley
• NASA cancels science flight, ditches international partners
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: bec"s(the 5th state of matter)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: my theories
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: my theories
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: T Wake
• bec"s(the 5th state of matter)
  • From: red_bre_ath
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Frazir, There might be a lot more too it than you think.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: my theories
  • From: Richard Herring
• Quantum Gravity 141.0: Sound vs Light in Astrophysics and Psychology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Quantum Gravity 141.0: Causation vs Light Speed vs Sound Speed
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: my theories
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 140.1: More Re Extra Dimensions Are Fundamentally Additive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 140.0: Extra Dimensions Are Fundamentally Additive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: T Wake
• Physicists confirm existence of polariton condensate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Electrons hold their spin in silicon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: High gamma energy source
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: hanson
• Re: my theories
  • From: T Wake
• Re: my theories
  • From: T Wake
• Re: need a cheap and easy air pump design
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: !! Top 10 Reasons The NIST Report Is A Farce !!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: jimp
• active tray
  • From: Evgeny
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• need a cheap and easy air pump design
  • From: acannell@xxxxxxx
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gravity is caused by capacitance?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Doug Reese
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Gravity is caused by capacitance?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity is caused by capacitance?
  • From: hanson
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Gravity is caused by capacitance?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: !! Top 10 Reasons The NIST Report Is A Farce !!
  • From: PD
• Nazi Gassings Never Happened!
  • From: hoaxbuster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: henri
• Re: South Dakota has 500,000 MW wind energy potential
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: T Wake
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: ²²Na
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: Ben newsam
• Gravity is caused by capacitance?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: !! Top 10 Reasons The NIST Report Is A Farce !!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: free energy ???
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: South Dakota has 500,000 MW wind energy potential
  • From: jimp
• Re: my theories
  • From: The_Man
• Re: South Dakota has 500,000 MW wind energy potential
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bill Gates is a money addict, he needs treatment.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: PD
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ²²Na
  • From: PD
• Re: Greed is eating ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Earth will manage to get hotter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: !! Top 10 Reasons The NIST Report Is A Farce !!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: !! New scientific analysis proves WTC Demolition !!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: jimp
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: malibu
• Conjecture: Storm Sprite Directionality
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: henri
• From black hole electrons to wormhole electron-positron pairs
  • From: Ceriel Nosforit
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• High gamma energy source
  • From: jaga
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: jimp
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: $ 10 MILLION chumps that cant make chump change
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Bill Gates is a money addict, he needs treatment.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• free energy ???
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: HELP X^8 +Y^8
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Earth will manage to get hotter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Eric Gisse
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 824 May 16, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: hanson
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Black hole shrinks braneworld dimensions
  • From: hanson
• Re: What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: You have 3s and 8s I have AAAAAA
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Daimler's Big Ass F_ck Up.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: $ 10 MILLION chumps that cant make chump change
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The house doesn't gamble; eventually, it takes all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A consortium of billionaires looking for a new toy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• What are the curl vs. conservative filed theorems called?
  • From: hetware
• Re: A consortium of billionaires looking for a new toy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• @T/@qj = 0 in Cartesian co-ordinates?
  • From: larryharson
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: ²²Na
  • From: Sam Wormley
• ²²Na
  • From: Srinidhi Venkatesh
• Re: Martian sands shift slowly but surely
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who claims that the WTC7-crash was NOT a controlled demolition?
  • From: Mark Peeters
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Martian sands shift slowly but surely
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Plank density/length/time are artifical limits.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics(EurekAlert!)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: malibu
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: racism
  • From: Ditto
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Ian Parker
• What is a central reverse polarity magnet?
  • From: henri
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: jimp
• And now for something completely different.
  • From: Rich
• Re: Why do objects move?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Princeton physicists connect string theory with established physics (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Negative resistance found in 2D electron gas
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why do objects move?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Martian sands shift slowly but surely
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Martian sands shift slowly but surely
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why do objects move?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: HELP X^8 +Y^8
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: vps137
• Re: my theories
  • From: T Wake
• Re: God discourse and Physics, Math and the Model.
  • From: Y
• God discourse and Physics, Math and the Model.
  • From: Y
• Re: gas reaction probability and density
  • From: rob
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Air pressure in a closed tube.
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: gas reaction probability and density
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: vps137
• Quantum Gravity 139.1: Cosmic Force Unifying Macroscopic and Microscopic Levels
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 139.0: Unification of Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Acceleration of Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A great idea for Google!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A great idea for Google!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Amazing Escape
  • From: jimp
• If there was a green tooth club in Seattle, I'd be a member.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• I'm selling 140 kiloton ships... Not !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: vps137
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: vps137
• Amazing Escape
  • From: Phil Holman
• A great idea for Google!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Martian sands shift slowly but surely
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Martian sands shift slowly but surely
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: malibu
• Re: Constructibility and Mathematical Existence
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Ode to da Predicate
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Like any other drug, too much money is lethal.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: For sale: Bjorken & Drell (x2), Itzykson & Zuber
  • From: Azathoth
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Androcles
• Frazir, I hope you can stay.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: my theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: mmeron
• Daimler's Big Ass F_ck Up.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Science enthusiasts needed for Newshour Study
  • From: barbara
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Negative resistance found in 2D electron gas
  • From: jimp
• Re: What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Black hole shrinks braneworld dimensions
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir's addiction money money more money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Negative resistance found in 2D electron gas
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Black hole shrinks braneworld dimensions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: malibu
• how to pronounce these names?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: PD
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: srp
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Doug Reese
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: my theories
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question about the velocity addition
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: malibu
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• gas reaction probability and density
  • From: rob
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Potter 1:69
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Electromagnetics question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Androcles
• Question about the velocity addition
  • From: vps137
• Re: The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Double-A
• Relativistic energy and mass
  • From: Maxwell Edison
• Re: rainbows
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Greg Neill
• The demographics of rudeness
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Egap
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Egap
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Egap
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Electromagnetics question
  • From: Portman
• Re: Frazir's addictions.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Potter 1:69
  • From: The_Man
• Re: FLRW metric related (pseudosphere )
  • From: Barrow
• Re: Potter 1:69
  • From: T Wake
• Re: my theories
  • From: T Wake
• Electromagnetics question
  • From: qwerty
• Frazir's addictions.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• What'll this 26 gigadollars be worth 9 years from now ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: racism
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The "Oil Age" is over!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Potter 1:69
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I'm doing fine.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I compete with myself, to reach _ My _ goals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Comments desired
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Comments desired
  • From: zomoco1
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Becoming the Universal God Body
  • From: jnadiaz@xxxxxxxxx
• Question about ATOM totality theory
  • From: Truth and Light
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Black hole vs earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: The_Man
• Black hole vs earth
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: racism
  • From: Ditto
• Re: FLRW metric related (pseudosphere )
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Double-A
• Re: The rest frame of the cosmic microwave background.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The rest frame of the cosmic microwave background.
  • From: T Wake
• The rest frame of the cosmic microwave background.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Deriving SR and GR using Euler angles? Any ideas
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Potter 1:69
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Deriving SR and GR using Euler angles? Any ideas
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: i like some liks to study more about the physics
  • From: PD
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What did Maxwell mean by "molecule"?
  • From: hetware
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Deriving SR and GR using Euler angles? Any ideas
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Deriving SR and GR using Euler angles? Any ideas
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Peter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: hanson
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: i like some liks to study more about the physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Peter
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• i like some liks to study more about the physics
  • From: THE FUTURE LIC.IN PHYSICS
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: PD
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: 18 percent of the world's shipping capacity is tied up.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Deriving SR and GR using Euler angles? Any ideas
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Deriving SR and GR using Euler angles? Any ideas
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Re: John Fredriksen: Norwegian multi-millionaire shipping magnate.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Centripetal acceleration
  • From: srp
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: aasigma
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: srp
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: srp
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Centripetal acceleration
  • From: Peter
• FLRW metric related (pseudosphere )
  • From: Barrow
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Units question
  • From: PD
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Elementary electrics
  • From: PD
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: PD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Doug Reese
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: PD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Only 11 mm LED slim light box Display in China!
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 14, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: racism
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: T Wake
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: racism
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Keynes and Bacon
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Are CNS electric signals AC or DC?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bob Cain
• The Tongass Giant's " Summer Seminar at Sea " ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Mind Control Weapons and Directed Energy Weapons
  • From: Finhead
• Mind Control Weapons and Directed Energy Weapons
  • From: soleilmavis
• 98 percent of the world's shipping capacity is tied up.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• John Fredriksen: Norwegian multi-millionaire shipping magnate.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Constructibility and Mathematical Existence
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: my theories
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: Ka-In Yen
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: my theories
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: my theories
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: hetware
• For sale: Bjorken & Drell (x2), Itzykson & Zuber
  • From: essentialsaltes
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: malibu
• Re: " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Are suspension fields theoretically possible?
  • From: STJensen
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: " Sea Giant " was " Batillus class ".
  • From: T Wake
• Re: racism
  • From: Ditto
• " Liquid Natural Gas " Tankers/Terminals.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Elementary electrics
  • From: Genius
• Re: Elementary electrics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: rainbows
  • From: Igor
• Quantum Gravity 138.0: Correction To Golden Mean From Setting y = t in Riccati dy/dt = A + By + Cy^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: " Sea Giant " was " Batillus class ".
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 138.0: Golden Mean From Setting y = t in Riccati dy/dt = A + By + Cy^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Edward Green
• Lookong for fun click hier
  • From: babe
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: My nude beach on the moon.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: My nude beach on the moon.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Elementary electrics
  • From: John
• Re: Units question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: hanson
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Units question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 137.9: Applied Physics Lab, Los Alamos Natl Lab New Mexico USA
  • From: OsherD
• Re: my theories
  • From: hanson
• Re: my theories
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: srp
• Quantum Gravity 137.9: Applied Physics Lab, Los Alamos Natl Lab New Mexico USA
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: my theories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Hourglass Buoyancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: bpazolli
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: bpazolli
• Re: Units question
  • From: qwerty
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: Eric Gisse
• " Sea Giant " was " Batillus class ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Units question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Gauss' Law and spheres
  • From: bpazolli
• Re: Units question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Units question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Units question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Units question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Units question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Quantum Gravity 137.8: References For How To Change The Sign of A Mass
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Gravity 137.7: How To Change The Sign of A Mass
  • From: Finhead
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• E&M Book Suggestions?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Dr. Tao ( T.J. ) is a big-ass free-trade activist.
  • From: BioFreak
• Global warming mathmatical meltdown
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Scaling back Giant John's expectations.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Scaling back Giant John's expectations.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Scaling back Giant John's expectations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• An all-expenses paid " science voyage " ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Scaling back Giant John's expectations.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: OG
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Set Automaton
• Re: Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 137.7: How To Change The Sign of A Mass
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Giant John, Why not give us a paid vacation instead ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What can ZPF Theory achieve in terms of Particle-Physics?
  • From: Zordan
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hourglass Buoyancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: OG
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Units question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: Air pressure in a closed tube.
  • From: darkshifter16
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Units question
  • From: nonsense
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Units question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: jimp
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: rainbows
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: why do....?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• why do....?
  • From: mhd
• rainbows
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Giant John, The Seawise Giant has not been scrapped.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: jimp
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• BASIC STAMP Computer and Real Time Control
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Red-Skinned giants.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Units question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Units question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Units question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hourglass Buoyancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hourglass Buoyancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Units question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Units question
  • From: PD
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hourglass Buouancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: OG
• Re: Hourglass Buouancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: OG
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein misses one important detail
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Hourglass Buouancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: John Bailey
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Units question
  • From: qwerty
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 11 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Hourglass Buouancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: CWatters
• Giant John, The Seawise Giant has not been scrapped.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 137.6: The Remarkable Case of Minimum PI in Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Quantum Gravity 137.5: Where Feynman's "Negative Probability" Shapes Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• I can help develop courseware... that's about it, that's my niche.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
• I'd be 100 percent retired, living on the streets, for life.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Red-Skinned giants.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Units question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Air pressure in a closed tube.
  • From: Finhead
• Re: I'm not answering my window or door these days.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: Finhead
• I'm not answering my window or door these days.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Electric field outside spherical capacitors
  • From: Androcles
• Hourglass Buouancy--Martin Gardner
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Air pressure in a closed tube.
  • From: Androcles
• Air pressure in a closed tube.
  • From: darkshifter16
• Re: Can a Nigerian get a green card by having a child with an Amer...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Electric field outside spherical capacitors
  • From: bpazolli
• Re: Can a Nigerian get a green card by having a child with an Amer...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: A Play NUke Sequencer
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: jimp
• Re: Most of Fredriksen's " money " is in trade banks and dockside, ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Most MY" money " is in trade banks and dockside,forest oil ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Yer life's story is amazing, Giant John, but it's not my niche.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Units question
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Units question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Theories are tools, handcrafted with intent.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Theories are tools, handcrafted with intent.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Units question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Units question
  • From: Androcles
• Yer life's story is amazing, Giant John, but it's not my niche.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Units question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Cherenkov chokers
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Uni...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Units question
  • From: qwerty
• Re: A Play NUke Sequencer
  • From: Finhead
• Re: Units question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units question
  • From: Finhead
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: Finhead
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 11 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units question
  • From: qwerty
• Re: Units question
  • From: qwerty
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Bandwidth of Talking
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Units question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Units question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Units question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Units question
  • From: qwerty
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 137.4: How Black Holes Create Quantum Gravity and Expansion
  • From: Finhead
• Re: The Hydrogen Transmission Network - A New Approach to Integrated Water and Energy management
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: The Hydrogen Transmission Network - A New Approach to Integrated Water and Energy management
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: BASIC controller IO for Play NUke
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: A Play NUke Sequencer
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: PD
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Need mental picture
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Igor
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Badly explained newscientist.com article ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Finhead
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: PD
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: PD
• Re: Most of you BS is fear and ignorance.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Hydrogen Transmission Network - A New Approach to Integrated Water and Energy management
  • From: Androcles
• Re: racism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are CNS electric signals AC or DC?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein misses one important detail
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Hydrogen Transmission Network - A New Approach to Integrated Water and Energy management
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Most of Fredriksen's " money " is in trade banks and dockside, ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Einstein misses one important detail
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: racism
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Are CNS electric signals AC or DC?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Are CNS electric signals AC or DC?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Big Bang, Vacuum Energy, and Nihilism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Androcles
• Badly explained newscientist.com article ?
  • From: news
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: nonsense
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: PD
• "Quantum Theory vs General Relativity"
  • From: Syad
• "Quantum Theory vs General Relativity"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: blackboab
• Re: racism
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Brain vs. Computer
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Brain vs. Computer
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: racism
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: racism
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 137.4: How Black Holes Create Quantum Gravity and Expansion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Androcles
• racism
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• The less money you want the more you like the government.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Most of Fredriksen's " money " is in trade banks and dockside, I assume.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: world Population and extra-solar planets.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Fermions pair up without superfluidity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Help with law verification : part II
  • From: Finhead
• Re: A Play NUke Sequencer
  • From: Finhead
• Re: BASIC controller IO for Play NUke
  • From: Finhead
• Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Can a Nigerian get a green card by having a child with an Ameri...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: WTC Towers: A Top-Down Controlled Demolition?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Help with law verification : part II
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: mike3
• Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: mike3
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: eric
• Can a Nigerian get a green card by having a child with an American ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: PD
• Re: I know who Mr. Wake is.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can you just fly any ol' flag you want ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• I know who Mr. Wake is.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Can you just fly any ol' flag you want ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: galathaea
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: eric
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: eric
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: blackboab
• Re: gravitational field equation problem
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: The_Man
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: CWatters
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: PD
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: CWatters
• Re: SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: PD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: blackboab
• SPORTS Physics - Can you hit a home run off a tball setup??
  • From: eric
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: PD
• Re: HIGGS FIELD
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: PD
• HIGGS FIELD
  • From: blackboab
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHERE THE GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FACTOR COMES FROM
  • From: eugene_stefanovich
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Octopus is in the Red Ensign group, maybe Gibraltar.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Octopus is in the Red Ensign group, maybe Gibraltar.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Need mental picture
  • From: plxmny
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: nonsense
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why fly " The Canadian Red Ensign " ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Need mental picture
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Discrete physical space and the mesure problem of QM
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: Need mental picture
  • From: plxmny
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Need mental picture
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Need mental picture
  • From: plxmny
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: WHERE THE GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FACTOR COMES FROM
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: malibu
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Syad
• A Play NUke Sequencer
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: blackboab
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: blackboab
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: RP
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: BASIC controller IO for Play NUke
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• What does the Universe look like from the other side of the Universe
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Please help me with the verification of this law
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• A lot of tankers have been under fire in the Gulf.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Quantum Gravity 137.3: Gravitation Versus "Repulsion" From 0 vs Infinity in 1 + y -x
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 137.2: Are Quantities Like 1 + y -x Preserved Under +/- ?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 137.2: Are Quantities Like 1 + y -x Preserved Under +/- ?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Quantum Gravity 137.1: Sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) in Causes Come From Infinity, Effects Come From Zero
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Quantum Gravity 137.0: Causes Come From Infinity, Effects Come From Zero
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• The Octopus is in the Red Ensign group, maybe Gibraltar.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: jimp
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Why fly " The Canadian Red Ensign " ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why fly " The Canadian Red Ensign " ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Why fly " The Canadian Red Ensign " ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: equation of state of the universe
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Q: Simulating solids, liquids and bouyancy.
  • From: PD
• Re: BASIC controller IO for Play NUke
  • From: Oat Mikey
• Re: Q: Simulating solids, liquids and bouyancy.
  • From: PD
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Oat Mikey
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Ball friction
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The reproduction of cars depends on their hosts ( i.e. humans ).
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: jimp
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Ball friction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• BASIC controller IO for Play NUke
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: aasigma
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Q: Simulating solids, liquids and bouyancy.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Ball friction
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Syad
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ball friction
  • From: CWatters
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: simple direct tunneling - units confusion
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• We slowly burn.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Tiny Black Holes: do they exist ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Ball friction
  • From: coetzee . evert
• simple direct tunneling - units confusion
  • From: Keiichi . McGuire
• Re: Q: Simulating solids, liquids and bouyancy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Q: Simulating solids, liquids and bouyancy.
  • From: Malcolm Ryan
• Re: Interesting: How Dark Matter Might Have Snuffed Out the First Stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Interesting: How Dark Matter Might Have Snuffed Out the First Stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 136.1: Non-Tunneling Condition Yields 1 + y - x
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The reproduction of cars depends on their hosts ( i.e. humans ).
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: PD
• Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: mike3
• Re: Jet stream can meet all our energy needs many times over
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
  • From: mike3
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: John Schutkeker
• The reproduction of cars depends on their hosts ( i.e. humans ).
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: One, Two, Three . . . Many
  • From: PD
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 136.0: Speed of Light As 1/2 on Scale of [0, 1] And PI As Unique Unit Square Solution
  • From: OsherD
• Play NUkes use a little Basic Stamp.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: take cosmos ... apart.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Silly question
  • From: EskWIRED
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Ireckon
• Re: Russell's Paradox (Antimony) Disproven, 3rd Comment
  • From: Bill Mays@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: PD
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: aasigma
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: Igor
• Re: Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 823 May 8, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Supernova 2006jc
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• equation of state of the universe
  • From: Barrow
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• take cosmos ... apart.
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Could this work as a Perpetual Motion Machine???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Ireckon
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The less money you need, the less the government will worry you.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Could this work as a Perpetual Motion Machine???
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: PD
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: PD
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do permitivity and permiability appear in EM expressions?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• The less money you need, the less the government will worry you.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Could this work as a Perpetual Motion Machine???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Could this work as a Perpetual Motion Machine???
  • From: CWatters
• Dr. Tao, You're whitewashing it.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: mike3
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: mike3
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: mike3
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: mike3
• Re: Check the facts and judge
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: mike3
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Re: The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• The Curve Space in Maths
  • From: caoyanwh2003
• Russell's Paradox (Antimony) Disproven, 3rd Comment
  • From: OsherD
• More Re: Russell's Antimony (Paradox) Apparently Disproven
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Radium
• Russell's Paradox (Antimony) Apparently Disproven
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Check the facts and judge
  • From: Nick
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Could this work as a Perpetual Motion Machine???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silly question
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Could this work as a Perpetual Motion Machine???
  • From: mike3
• Re: __measure__ sharpness ? YOUR ALL FUCKNUTZ
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GPS gizmos for sale.
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: __measure__ sharpness ? with mic idiot.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: __measure__ sharpness //cuts
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: If Frazir was lying out his ass.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: None of you fuck with any facts
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Questions about Bose-Einstein condensation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Questions about Bose-Einstein condensation
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Extremely High Voltage, Extremely Low Amperage, 1 watt?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Bill Habr
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Silly question
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Silly question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly question
  • From: UKuser
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Allan
• Re: Silly question
  • From: Allan
• Re: Silly question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Silly question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GPS gizmos for sale.
  • From: Androcles
• Silly question
  • From: UKuser
• Re: Condense math and physics formulary
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: PD
• Condense math and physics formulary
  • From: Martin
• Re: Reflection and re-emission of light of light
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS gizmos for sale.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Edward Green
• Coriolis Force in a Sphere
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 135.0: The Russians, Baez, Smolin, Rovelli, and Their Hamiltonian Anti-Inflation Approach
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Allan
• Re: Reflection and re-emission of light of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doppler paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dr. Tao ( T.J. ) is a big-ass free-trade activist.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Reflection and re-emission of light of light
  • From: Jim O'Reilly
• Re: Would Paul Allen say this ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G.P.S. system and lunar landings.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Would Paul Allen play this ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dr. Tao, Do you have a Grand Prix entry ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sign Error in Lens-Thirring Force?
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Thermo emf
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Syad
• Re: Density of the ether in space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: heat question ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Density of the ether in space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: PD
• Doppler paradox
  • From: tarq
• A poem for Sam Wormley
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• The G.P.S. system and lunar landings.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: physics
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 07, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Unlike Mr. Potter, I'm content with myself and my city.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In no way am I fond of lawyers, debt, accountants and heavy assets.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• GPS gizmos for sale.
  • From: Androcles
• I'm very zen-like, but with a weakness for computers and food.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Dr. Tao, Do you have a Grand Prix entry ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 134.1: More Re Conformal Algebra vs Heisenberg Algebra in Early Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 134.0: Conformal Algebra vs Heisenberg Algebra in Early Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Would Paul Allen say this ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Check the facts and judge
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Large, open-air headphones that breathe and surround the ear.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Questions about Bose-Einstein condensation
  • From: silicon2006
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Feeding cute kids isn't a good idea, Dr.Tao.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: nonsense
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Feeding cute kids isn't a good idea, Dr.Tao.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Feeding cute kids isn't a good idea, Dr.Tao.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hypersphere; 1G
  • From: Nick
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Protecting Armored Vehicles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Nick
• Re: butterfly physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: HELP X^8 +Y^8
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: T.J. would _ Rent _ me a dumpster in _ Ohio _ .
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• T.J. would _ Rent _ me a dumpster in _ Ohio _ .
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: What isn't physics ?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: It has begun - irrigating the deserts
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: What isn't physics ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: It has begun - irrigating the deserts
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What isn't physics ?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: Bill Snyder
• What isn't physics ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Sign Error in Lens-Thirring Force?
  • From: Supertech
• Re: Sign Error in Lens-Thirring Force?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Our choices are very limited.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Igor
• Re: Density of the ether in space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Seen Bill Gates here lately ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: mmeron
• Sign Error in Lens-Thirring Force?
  • From: Supertech
• butterfly physics
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Our choices are very limited.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A 29 year old insect.
  • From: boson boss
• Re: A 29 year old insect.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No torque on an a-chrial body in Stokes flow?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: In no way am I fond of lawyers, debt, accountants and heavy ass...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Density of the ether in space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: How bad do you want me to become a " Job Creator ", Tom Potter ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: The_Man
• Re: HELP X^8 +Y^8
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: A rented room in Seattle is nice, but not 430 dollars a month n...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Feeding cute kids isn't a good idea, Dr.Tao.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Worm Hole no Need for Black Hole
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: HELP X^8 +Y^8
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why is the universe so small?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• In no way am I fond of lawyers, debt, accountants and heavy assets.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• HELP X^8 +Y^8
  • From: Divij Rao
• Why is the universe so small?
  • From: gerson
• Re: How bad do you want me to become a " Job Creator ", Tom Potter ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Hanson assettes are like royalty, he coddles them.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 133.6: Why The Universe Would Choose a "Preferred Direction"
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 133.5: Why The Universe Does Not Simultaneously Vary As A Complex Variable In Both Magntitude and Angle
  • From: OsherD
• How bad do you want me to become a " Job Creator ", Tom Potter ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 133.4: More Re An Uncountable Generalization of a Tensor Via Constant Angle Riccati Systems
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Feeding cute kids isn't a good idea, Dr.Tao.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Quantum Gravity 133.3: An Uncountable Generalization of a Tensor Via Constant Angle Riccati Systems
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 100 percent of Frazir's " trade deals " can be verified.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Poem for Potter: Do not go gentle into real understanding of GTR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Feeding cute kids isn't a good idea, Dr.Tao.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• HAWK
  • From: Nick
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Hall effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three-Planet Orbit Remains True
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Dr. Tao ( T.J. ) has a big-ass & is a Monopoly-trade activist.
  • From: hanson
• Re: all knowing space
  • From: Uncle Al
• Three-Planet Orbit Remains True
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Hall effect
  • From: Androcles
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: heat question ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Hall effect
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "Gravity"
  • From: Sbaws
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Importance of Cinco de Mayo
  • From: Jong Kim
• Quantum Gravity 133.2: More Re Angle As a Dimension in Krantz, Luce, Suppes, Tversky And in Complex Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 133.1: More Re Angle As a Dimension in Krantz, Luce, Suppes, Tversky And in Complex Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Thermo emf
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: all knowing space
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: All solutions manuals are in pdf format or Microsoft Word format!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Quantum Gravity 133.0: Angle As a Dimension in Krantz, Luce, Suppes, Tversky And in Complex Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: I prefer " informal gigs ", always will.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I prefer " informal gigs ", always will.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I prefer " informal gigs ", always will.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: VVFWS NOMINATION: The Anti-Relativists
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Would Dr. Tao match this ? Hell no.
  • From: tj Frazir
• all knowing space
  • From: boson boss
• Randomness can't be anything other than a failure to predict.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Dr. Tao ( T.J. ) is a big-ass free-trade activist.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Hall effect
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hall effect
  • From: CWatters
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 132.0: Spin As Inherent Property of Spacetime and Quon Statistics
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 131.1: Why Inflation of the Universe is Being Attacked
  • From: OsherD
• Hall effect
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Thermo emf
  • From: vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity 131.0: Inflation Stupidfies Superluminality
  • From: BillMays
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Quantum Gravity 131.0: Inflation Implies Superluminality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: NEUTRON STAR NEAR
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• L1 Lagrange point - not stable
  • From: philkryder
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 4 May 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Photomultiplier question -
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A condensate of fermion pairs.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• A condensate of fermion pairs.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: NEUTRON STAR NEAR
  • From: Nick
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Ka-In Yen
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: heat question ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 May 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: 1912--2007
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: heat question ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: heat question ?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Zen masters and Spatial time.
  • From: Mark Kent
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Greg Neill
• heat question ?
  • From: asdf
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: PD
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear power
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear power
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 130.1: Sidharth and Spin and R ~ GM/c^2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 130.1: Sidharth and Spin and R ~ GM/c^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: mmeron
• Is a hot brick more massive?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Evryone's consciousness' life's eternity's prove
  • From: zetan_duke
• Re: Greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear power
  • From: Brad Guth
• Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einsteins Relativity and Chemistry.
  • From: Igor
• Re: You can be too rich just like you can be too fat.
  • From: hanson
• Re: If the electrons are coherent Cooper pairs...
  • From: Igor
• electron-hole pair
  • From: heng
• electron-hole pair
  • From: heng
• Re: Scott Miller: What if (on White Dwarfs)
  • From: BradGuth
• electron-hole pair
  • From: heng
• Re: Scott Miller: What if (on White Dwarfs)
  • From: BradGuth
• Scott Miller: What if (on White Dwarfs)
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Casimir force could drive tiny ratchets
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: General Relativity tests the limits of our insturments.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Universe with different physical laws
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: BradGuth
• Dark matter halo and gravito magnetism
  • From: Supertech
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Chemical potential of photons
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Relations are the Foundations, not Mathematical Functions.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Relations are the Foundations, not Mathematical Functions.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: nonsense
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: 1912--2007
  • From: BioFreak
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Sbaws
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: The_Man
• Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: 1912--2007
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: ABarlow
• General Relativity tests the limits of our insturments.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 130.0 Dimensionality Approach of B. G. Sidharth and What Peer Review Did To It
  • From: OsherD
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: malibu
• Re: You can be too rich just like you can be too fat.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You can be too rich just like you can be too fat.
  • From: tj Frazir
• NEUTRON STAR NEAR
  • From: Nick
• No one likes mooches.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 128.0: A Few Words on Jew's Attempt To Bury Modified Gravity
  • From: BillMays
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Bose- and Cooper pair-condensates.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Supersolids reliant on disorder, say physicists
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Casimir force could drive tiny ratchets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Research tj's Monopoly-money before you judge,
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If the electrons are coherent Cooper pairs...
  • From: malibu
• Re: The known Universe has only a " known history ", not an " age ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Information as mass-energy.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If the electrons are coherent Cooper pairs...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Information as mass-energy.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• If the electrons are coherent Cooper pairs...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 128.0: A Few Words on New York's Attempt To Bury Modified Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• The known Universe has only a " known history ", not an " age ".
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 127.1: More Re Poplawski (Indiana U., USA) on Unified Gravity and BM
  • From: BillMays
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Scientist or Ostrich? You can't be both.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: BradGuth
• Scientist or Ostrich? You can't be both.
  • From: malibu
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 127.1: More Re Poplawski (Indiana U., USA) on Unified Purely Affine Theory of Gravity and EM
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Maxwell Equation Model of Gravitation
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Einsteins Relativity and Chemistry.
  • From: smallpond
• Re: Largest Possible Pyramid
  • From: Florian
• Re: Why do permitivity and permiability appear in EM expressions?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: hanson
• Loud Mouth Draper Weasels on Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: hanson
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Chemical potential of photons
  • From: srp
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Evryone's consciousness' life's eternity's prove
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How old is the Milky Way?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Present atomic physics is built based on a large number of fraudulent postulations
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: z
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: z
• Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time.
  • From: Y
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: PD
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Chemical potential of photons
  • From: nure123
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Einsteins Relativity and Chemistry.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Einsteins Relativity and Chemistry.
  • From: Y
• Testament to my Non-Arrogance. Golden Mean Time.
  • From: Y
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: The_Man
• Re: How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No torque on an a-chrial body in Stokes flow?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: hanson
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: PD
• Re: Research tj's Monopoly-money before you judge,
  • From: hanson
• Pauper Relf's research while he's on crack
  • From: hanson
• Re: Laugh when you judge, tj's Billions
  • From: hanson
• tj Frazir is falling on hard times,
  • From: hanson
• Re: Charging a conductor
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You can be too rich just like you can be too fat.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Mark Peeters
• Re: How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: Igor
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Re: matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• No torque on an a-chrial body in Stokes flow?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You're not activists, Tom Potter, John Bailo, Y Porat, Hanson, Dr. Tao.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Fire fighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Charging a conductor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• How old is the Milky Way?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: nonsense
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: PD
• Re: Electromagnetic Radiation - A new model
  • From: malibu
• matter and radiation are simply energy moving in linked rotations
  • From: malibu
• Re: Electromagnetic Radiation - A new model
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Research before you judge,
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: heat transfer to upper atmosphere
  • From: asdf
• Re: How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Information Density and random ( i.e. unpredictable ) numbers.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: nonsense
• Re: sunburn
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Greg Hansen
• How many Electrons Can Fit on the head of a Pin??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: plxmny
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: heat transfer to upper atmosphere
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Electromagnetic Radiation - A new model
  • From: Luciano Buggio
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sbaws
• Re: It's always the fat man that thinks he's skinny.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: No common complex domain/space
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: heat transfer to upper atmosphere
  • From: CWatters
• heat transfer to upper atmosphere
  • From: asdf
• Re: sunburn
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Research before you judge, Hanson.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 127.0: Poplawski (Indiana U., USA) on Unified Purely Affine Theory of Gravity and EM
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: hanson
• Re: tj's $10 mil monopoly money ran dry ... down to 3
  • From: hanson
• Thermal radiation of molten iron
  • From: hetware
• Information Density and random ( i.e. unpredictable ) numbers.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• St. Athanasius on 11-6-01
  • From: innvia
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: tj's thing: $10 mil monopoly money for dry milk irac
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Global Cooling is the bigger issue.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Global Cooling is the bigger issue.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Quantum Gravity 126.1: Electric Charge Density Causes Expansion of E + H According To Maxwell's Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tj's thing: $10 mil monopoly money for dry milk irac
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: sunburn
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Greenhouse my ass your ass and evrybodys ass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 126.0: Maxwell's Equations Say That Time Change of Electric Field and of Charge Causes Rotation and Causes Magnetic Field Time Change But Not Vice Versa
  • From: OsherD
• Did you use Google to feel out the maket and the trade bank ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• sunburn
  • From: bob
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tj's thing: $10 mil monopoly money for dry milk irac
  • From: nonsense
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Ka-In Yen
• Re: Greenhouse my ass your ass and evrybodys ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: hanson
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Quantum Gravity 125.0: Nonlinear Electrodynamic Theories Coupled To Gravity In U.K., USA, Poland, Australia, Mexico, Japan
  • From: BillMays
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: plxmny
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: jimp
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: tj's thing: $10 mil monopoly money for dry milk irac
  • From: hanson
• Re: Electronic Dice
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: tj's thing: $10 mil monopoly money for dry milk irac
  • From: tj Frazir
• Electronic Dice
  • From: Greg Hansen
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: premji40
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: premji40
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: physics
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• jupiter flyby
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Scientific theory of human error?
  • From: Michael Hell
• Re: physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: PD
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sbaws
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Sbaws
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: jimp
• Re: Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: PD
• Ampere Turn in Electromagnet
  • From: premji40
• Re: Einstein's Cross
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: plxmny
• Re: Einstein's Cross
  • From: Sam Wormley
• It's always the fat man that thinks he's skinny.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Einstein's Cross
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Jim
• Re: No common complex domain/space
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• I'm nothing like an activist... I'm just too damn content.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• physics
  • From: potugadu . pedda
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: galathaea
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 125.0: Nonlinear Electrodynamic Theories Coupled To Gravity In U.K., USA, Poland, Australia, Mexico, Japan
  • From: OsherD
• tj's thing: $10 mil monopoly money for dry milk irac
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why do permitivity and permiability appear in EM expressions?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Jim
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, $ 10 mil dry milk irac
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Invariance of Space-like interval from kinematics
  • From: hetware
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, $ 10 mil dry milk irac
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Ka-In Yen
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, tj frazir has nothing
  • From: hanson
• Re: T_Wake is too stupid to live rich
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Largest Possible Pyramid
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Ka-In Yen
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity is doppler shift of EM fields?
  • From: gubbenimanen
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th
• Re: Largest Possible Pyramid
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Imaginary Action
  • From: CWatters
• Re: T_Wake is too stupid to live rich
  • From: harris777
• Re: Chlorine question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHY PHYSICISTS BELIEVE IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: visit http://www.real-article.com/nasa/index.php
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 822 May 1, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: visit http://www.real-article.com/nasa/index.php
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When are you calling, Dr. Tao ?
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• Re: When are you calling, Dr. Tao ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 124.0: Egyptian Generalization of Einstein's Unified EM-Gravity Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T_Wake is too stupid to live rich
  • From: T Wake
• Re: " Jesus " gets nailed to the cross ten times a day by thesef_c...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Do you know any real programmers, Ghost ?
  • From: T Wake
• Chlorine question
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: Wake 10,000 ton maple $ 15 mil for 30,000 acres
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Jim
• Re: Stern-Gerlach with a twist
  • From: plxmny
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Stern-Gerlach with a twist
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Sugar will soon fuel cars
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, hanson has polygrip
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: " Jesus " gets nailed to the cross ten times a day by these f_c...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, don't try to change them.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, don't try to change them.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Jim
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Big Bertha Thing retrenchment
  • From: Tony Lance
• Re: Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: galathaea
• Imaginary Action
  • From: plxmny
• Re: $$$$$$$ COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION $$$$$$$
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Rayleigh scattering coefficients
  • From: Jim
• Re: " Jesus " gets nailed to the cross ten times a day by these f_c...
  • From: Randy Poe
• $$$$$$$ COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION $$$$$$$
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: visit http://www.real-article.com/nasa/index.php
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: T_Wake is too stupid to live rich
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: " Jesus " gets nailed to the cross ten times a day by these f_c...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: PD
• Re: Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• visit http://www.real-article.com/nasa/index.php
  • From: hiruma333
• Will the LHC kill us all?
  • From: Paul Grieg
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scaled nebula
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Invariance of Space-like interval from kinematics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Androcles
• Mathtrek: Computer, Name That Tune!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How greedy is this, Hanson ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Everyone's got their thing, don't try to change them.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Plague (not the Existentialist version by Albert Camus)
  • From: Jong Kim
• When are you calling, Dr. Tao ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Mooches
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 April 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What was the main difficulty that faced Einstein when he tried to unify GR with electromagnetism ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The proof of mass vector.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 123.0: Causation of Charge in Black Holes and Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 123.0: Causation of Charge in Black Holes and Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• WORKING OUT ALGEBRA TO CALCULUS OF PHYSICS OF GENESIS SPECIAL THEORY MODELING
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Can I just visit Ohio until Giant Forest leaves June 15th ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Do you know any real programmers, Ghost ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sam Wormley is as transparent as glass.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Dr. Tao married last month ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Wake 10,000 ton maple $ 15 mil for 30,000 acres
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wake 10,000 ton maple $ 15 mil for 30,000 acres
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: Huang Xien Chen
• Re: What I do with my life is up to me, not you, Gisse.
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: ¡¡ Don't call me a drug addict ! ! !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Don't tell me anything you don't want everyone to know, Dr. Tao.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Don't tell me anything you don't want everyone to know, Dr. Tao.
  • From: tj Frazir
• How does Tom_Potter explain the cosmos ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Precession of Binary Star PSR 1913+16
  • From: Androcles
• Do you know any real programmers, Ghost ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Who claims that Armstrong was REALLY ON THE MOON?
  • From: PD
• Re: " Jesus " gets nailed to the cross ten times a day by these f_ckers.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy Wake assorted morons
  • From: Randy Poe
• " Jesus " gets nailed to the cross ten times a day by these f_ckers.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: T_Wake'd a make a great judge and/or lawyer.
  • From: Phineas T Puddleduck
• T_Wake'd a make a great judge and/or lawyer.
  • From: Jeff…Relf