Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 May 2007 12:10:50 -0700
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how the Usenet index of whatever's search topic relevant (such
as a search for Brad Guth) and otherwise as "sorted by date" are
usually skewed far away from what's honestly the case. In other
words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in favor of their
promoting and/or sustaining whatever's their faith-based or political
agenda of the day. There's absolutely nothing fair about usenet, that
is unless you're one of those that happen to think what the Third
Reich had going was fair.
-
Brad Guth
.
- References:
- Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
- From: Brad Guth
- Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
- Prev by Date: Re: Photomultiplier question -
- Next by Date: Re: Is a hot brick more massive?
- Previous by thread: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
- Next by thread: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
