Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based

On 6 May, 14:35, Bill Snyder <bsny...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6 May 2007 13:12:28 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On 6 May, 06:38, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wow! I'm right, as usual.

GOOGLE/Usenet and especially MailGate/Usenet and naturally UKs extra
tight ***-crack Ureader/Usenet service are each doing a real bang-up
job of covering thy infomercial spewing butts, by way of excluding
whomever and/or trashing whatever rocks their boat.

Ureader: "This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use." which means they clearly don't want folks
telling the truth.

Topic/author stalking and summarily trashing via brown-nosed clowns
doing their usual MI/NSA cloak and dagger spook/mole naysay thing, is
fairly obvious.

Don't you just love it when you're right all along.
-Bradguth

Usenet = Born Again Bigots-R-Us (aka Art Deco and Jewish company at
large)

This usenet sure as hell isn't being run amuck by Muslims, or most any
other faith-based group, is it. Hell's bells, most blacks are even
excluded, which gives this warm and fuzzy usenet a somewhat e-KKK
status quo, if not e-(Third Reich) with a Jewish flavor to boot.

Telling you that you're a racist, repulsive dolt, a scientific
ignoramus, and a delusional wackjob doesn't make someone a bigot. It
just marks them as capable of reading your posts.

So telling those mainstream status quo lies upon lies, or as having
been excluding evidence that doesn't fit your mindset, or such as
allowing all that's derived from those of your kind and GW Bush, is
supposedly not being a "racist, repulsive dolt, a scientific
ignoramus, and a delusional wackjob"?

"It just marks them as capable of reading your posts."

I can't be sure; Was that one an encrypted message from your very own
black hole?

I'm afraid that Usenet is not entirely robo, whereas instead it's
capably moderated and/or stealth managed from those having the proper
master codes and/or having those nifty back-door and/or special-
interest tricks at their disposal. Unlike specifically moderated
groups, those supposedly unmoderated groups as served by way of
computers as such, are not capable of AI running amuck, whereas it
takes the expertise of individuals in charge of allowing, diverting
and/or skewing each and every byte of whatever gets posted.

Phony topic index stacking and/or simply not giving proper index
updates to those you folks hate the most is clearly what being Third
Reich or just extra special bigoted is all about, isn't it.

Some Usenet servers are of course much worse off than others, few if
any are stand alone 'free-for-all' robo-usenet servers without human
factors. In other words, Usenet is exactly whatever those in charge
intend and/or allow it to be, including those client specific
capabilities that makes it possible for certain groups to being
excluded and/or made to think quite differently than the facts
represent, and that's exactly what most any government and of their
faith-based or big-business (including MI/NSA) puppeteers insist upon
maintaining as such. Only a damn fool (such as anyone supporting GW
Bush or just being naysay for the Old Testament hell of it) thinks
otherwise.
-
Brad Guth

.

Quantcast