Quantum Gravity 134.0: Conformal Algebra vs Heisenberg Algebra in Early Universe

From Osher Doctorow

"Possible polarisation and spin dependent aspects of quantum gravity,"
by D. V. Ahluwalia-Kalilova, N. G. Gresnigt, Alex B. Nielsen, D.
Schritt, T.F. Watson, U. Canterbury New Zealand, arXiv: 0704.1669 v1
[gr-qc] 12 Apr 2007, 14 pages, argue that inhomogeneities in the
Universe serving as seeds for cosmological structure formation could
only occur if the early Universe was not in the Heisenberg and
Poincare (special relativistic and quantum field theory) algebras but
in the conformal algebra, and that to obtain such a result an
"interpolation" algebra interpolating between all these types is
useful.

From the viewpoint of Quantum Gravity via the Probable Influence/
Causation (PI) approach, the Heisenberg and Poincare algebras have
never had much appeal as fundamentals of Quantum Gravity, while
Conformal Transformations and Conformal Field Theory at least have
considerable value because they are angle-preserving.

I have argued in the last few posts of this thread for the critical
importance of constant-angle scenarios in Probable Influence/
Causation, although constant magnitude scenarios are also very
important. To get multiple simultaneous directions of expansion or
contraction, you have to look at each constant angle path or directed
radius vector from the origin.

Their paper is quite original, although arguably the Heisenberg and
Poincare algebras are not fundamental and the interpolation is not so
important.

Ahluwalia has 13 papers in arXiv, 2002-2007, while the other authors'
papers in arXiv range from 6 for the third author to 1 for the 4th and
5th authors.

Osher Doctorow

.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast