Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 00:56:29 GMT
mike3 wrote:
On May 8, 5:54 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
String theory has yet to make a testable prediction. Therefore it
is not scientific!
Observation strongly constrain a value for a cosmological constant
in GTR.
So then you're saying string theory does not know how to rationalize,
nor is there any way to test any proposed rationalization. And if it
is not scientific, why bother? Why not try a different approach?
What I'm saying is that string theory make no testable predictions
and, therefore, is not falsifiable. That's not a theory of science.
Some are coming to the conclusion that a different approach is
inevitable.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- From: mike3
- Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- References:
- "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- From: mike3
- Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- From: mike3
- "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- Prev by Date: Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- Next by Date: Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- Previous by thread: Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- Next by thread: Re: "Vacuum catastrophe" and string theory
- Index(es):