Re: Please help me with the verification of this law

In article <1178792153.001855.204520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
rAgAv <ragav.payne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Law--"Every physical, observable effect has a physical, observable
cause preceding it and the cause and effect are related by the laws of
interaction of physics"

is this law correct? Is there any proof? Has this law been published?
Can somebody disprove this?


Regards
--
rAgAv

***{The nature of a thing lies in the sum and arrangement of its parts.
Every thing that exists and every phenomenon that occurs has a
recipe--an exclusive list of things which, if assembled in a particular
way by nature or by man, will produce that thing or phenomenon. The
thing or phenomenon is the effect, and the act of assembly (bringing
together in the required way those specific components and no others) is
the cause. Hence we can say that everything that happens has its cause.
Observers are irrelevant, except in cases where they are elements of the
effect or the cause.

The proof of the law of causality, that everything which happens has its
cause, lies in the principle of continuity, that no thing may come into
existence out of nothing or vanish into nothing. For if that is true,
then the nature of the effect is entirely determined by the carrying out
of its recipe--i.e., by the bringing together in the required way of the
required components and no others.

If, for example, I bring together the components of an automobile, and
nothing else, and assemble them in the specific way required by the
recipe for an automobile, then when I am done I should have an
automobile. If I do not, it can only be because one or more of the
required components that I brought together vanished into nothing, or
because one or more new components that were not required came into
existence out of nothing. If nothing got there except the stuff I
brought in, and nothing left except the stuff I took out, and if the
only forces of assembly were exerted by me, then the only possible
result will be an automobile.

If, in short, the principle of continuity is true, then the law of
causality is true.

And that's all there is to that story.

--Mitchell Jones}***

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
    ... The proof of the law of causality, that everything which happens has its ... cause, lies in the principle of continuity, that no thing may come into ... laughable textbooks that teach irrationalist physics, ... and assemble them in the specific way required by the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OT: MO Gorvernor foils the plans of insane Rev. Fred Phelps
    ... That said, the law is wrong. ... And the Phelps crowd isn't interfering with the mourners' right to ... but the Phelps crowd disrupts their gathering & prevents ... the Phelps crowd has the right to assemble to *protest* the ...
    (alt.smokers.pipes)
  • Re: Doesnt this all seem too familiar?
    ... :Please read Amendment I, ... Please obey the LAW! ... I am at the Wyndham Hotel in Chicago at this moment. ... assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
    ... interaction of physics" ... The proof of the law of causality, that everything which happens has its ... If, for example, I bring together the components of an automobile, and ... and assemble them in the specific way required by the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OT Just in from Fox
    ... > automobile. ... A law such as this *could* hasten their demise, ... foreign luxury auto companies might be willing to assist in getting such a ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
Loading