Re: Please help me with the verification of this law


"Mitchell Jones" <mjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mjones-35579E.12491510052007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1178792153.001855.204520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
rAgAv <ragav.payne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Law--"Every physical, observable effect has a physical, observable
cause preceding it and the cause and effect are related by the laws of
interaction of physics"

is this law correct? Is there any proof? Has this law been published?
Can somebody disprove this?


Regards
--
rAgAv

***{The nature of a thing lies in the sum and arrangement of its parts.
Every thing that exists and every phenomenon that occurs has a
recipe--an exclusive list of things which, if assembled in a particular
way by nature or by man, will produce that thing or phenomenon. The
thing or phenomenon is the effect, and the act of assembly (bringing
together in the required way those specific components and no others) is
the cause. Hence we can say that everything that happens has its cause.
Observers are irrelevant, except in cases where they are elements of the
effect or the cause.

The proof of the law of causality, that everything which happens has its
cause, lies in the principle of continuity, that no thing may come into
existence out of nothing or vanish into nothing. For if that is true,
then the nature of the effect is entirely determined by the carrying out
of its recipe--i.e., by the bringing together in the required way of the
required components and no others.

If, for example, I bring together the components of an automobile, and
nothing else, and assemble them in the specific way required by the
recipe for an automobile, then when I am done I should have an
automobile. If I do not, it can only be because one or more of the
required components that I brought together vanished into nothing, or
because one or more new components that were not required came into
existence out of nothing. If nothing got there except the stuff I
brought in, and nothing left except the stuff I took out, and if the
only forces of assembly were exerted by me, then the only possible
result will be an automobile.

If, in short, the principle of continuity is true, then the law of
causality is true.

And that's all there is to that story.

--Mitchell Jones}***

Here is a post I made about ten years ago,
about the basic "nature of a thing",
and how to isolate the basic "parts" of a complex "thing".
========================================

Dimensions are just imaginary, orthogonal, lines that we use to
plot the value of FUNDAMENTAL properties on.

If we want to plot space in the X direction, we draw a line
and plot the X value of space along this line.

If we want to plot space in the Y direction, we draw a line
and plot the Y value of space along this line, and so on.

Now it is possible to combine two or more properties
and plot them along some line. For example, if we wanted
to plot the area of baseball parks, we could combine X and Y
values for the parks and plot them along a line.
This plot however would not reveal the actual values
of the FUNDAMENTAL dimensions that the area was
a function of.

The way we discover FUNDAMENTAL dimensions is to
recursively examine the intensions of something, until
we end up with a unique set of countable ( Quantum )
orthogonal ( Unique ), properties. It appears that all
of the FUNDAMENTAL properties so far discovered
are bipolar, and have clockwise AND counterclockwise values.

We "recursively examine the intensions" of things
by experimentation. Isolating intensions that we know
and can control and looking for others. For example, if we
thought that we could move objects with our mind
( A new "dimension " ) we would put objects
in an environment to isolate them from other influences,
and try to correlate movement of the object with the
new dimension we postulate.

It also appears that when these bipolar FUNDAMENTAL properties
combine, they disappear, and evidence of this disappearance
manifests itself somewhere else. The point of
disappearance is called a source, a photon, a cause, a radio wave,
etc.
and the point of appearance is called a sink, a photon, an effect,
etc.

When we recursively examine the intensions of ANYTHING,
we end up we a small set of countable, orthogonal, bipolar
properties, and it appears that the most fundamental properties
are charge, baryon number and hypercharge, although it appears
that hypercharge and its bed buddy strangeness are composite
fundamental dimensions like area.

Parity, spin, charge, etc. appear to be expressions of the bipolar
aspects
of particular fundamental properties.

These countable, orthogonal, bipolar FUNDAMENTAL properties
manifest themselves as cycles when then are observed.
It takes an event for an observation to occur.

Hard reality consists of cycles of orthogonal, FUNDAMENTAL
properties, and events. We use these to construct a reality
that is compatible with our hard-wired, human programming.

--
Tom Potter

*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com


.

Relevant Pages