Re: Please help me with the verification of this law

On May 11, 2:42 pm, The_Man <me_so_hornee...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 11, 1:40 pm, Mitchell Jones <mjo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
***{The fact that you placed "vacuum" in quotes, above, suggests that
you do not even believe your own statement--

No, it doesn't suggest that. It refer to the vaccum that way, because
we know that the vacuum is a very busy place.

The vacuum is not the void.

which means: you are
perfectly aware that supposedly "empty space" is not empty at all, and,
in fact, is filled with a medium having mass

No

http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+electron+size+big

and containing enormous
amounts of energy. Hence there is in fact no evidence whatsoever that
any of the particles in question appear out of nothing or vanish into
nothing.

There is tons o' evidence. Every time we do spectroscopy, photons are
being created and destroyed all the time. When you are reading this on
your computer screen, photons are being created out of nothing on the
screen, travelling to you eye, being absorbed by cis-retinol, end of
photon.

There is no[ne] nothing. You pay; you make.

If, for example, you assume that it is possible for things to come into
existence out of nothing,

I don't ASSUME it; it is CONFIRMED by mountains of experiments.

You hav absolutely no proof of nothing.

which means: you would have no basis for the inference from
sensation to source--which means: you would have no basis for inferring
the existence of the external world,

Your knowledge of biology is even poorer than your knowledge of
physics. "Phantom limb pain" is quite well know ("It was in all the
papers, boss!").If an amputee feels pain in a limb, does it mean that
it is really there?

Something is still the cause, that of the historic impression in the
mind and thew.

Therefore if the principle of continuity is false, then you have no
basis for believing in the existence of anything, including yourself,

I do have a basis - experiments. I DON'T have a basis for "believing"
in the existence of ANYTHING when I am not observing it. In fact, it
is MEANINGLESS to talk about such existence.

meanningles but not meanningfree--open sustemic dependense is not shut
sustemic nonexistense.

the external world, science, Heisenberg, "virtual particles,"
"electron-positron pairs," "quantum mechanics," "relativity," or any
other damn stupid thing from the zoo of irrationalist physics.

QM is quite compatible with no "principle of continuity". I know this
upsets you, but, heh, too bad. Deal with it.

There is no continuum; however there is a discretum of aitiolòjies
with partial states.

to wit: the collapse of the entire structure of human
knowledge--it follows that the principle of continuity must be true.
Q.E.D.

Wrong. QM tells everything we can know about the world on a subatomic
level.

http://wikipedia.org/wiki/SED

-Aut

.

Relevant Pages

  • Answers! (was: Science Mags top 125 unanswered questions)
    ... > What Is the Universe Made Of? ... > What is the Biological Basis of Consciousness? ... Consciousness is pure existence. ... Stefan law to approximate the Hawking radiation of the quantum black ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
    ... >> pathways through space and exert force by contact. ... >> have no basis for belief in the existence of anything, ... > that there is a correspondence principle that makes one nature/behavior ... validity of the principle of continuity, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
    ... >>> have no basis for belief in the existence of anything, ... A wave, for example, by definition follows not one continuous ... >> that there is a correspondence principle that makes one nature/behavior ... > of the principle of continuity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Supremum of ordinals
    ... of continuity with the epsilon-delta definition of ... there IS a non-measurable set of reals, ... statements of particular existence. ... nor can we say what is "explicit" ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ Apparent Red Shift ]
    ... >>together by the use of inductive logic, the fact of continuity can be ... which I am herewith replying the universe continued to exist. ... her definition is, "Existence is existing," or for short, "Existence ... Infinity is a potentiality only, and it can never be demonstrated to ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast