Re: Gamma Ray Bursts, Rees' Theory : what are the odds ?

On May 12, 8:24 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 12, 3:51 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 12, 10:26 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
blackboab wrote:
Martin Rees' Theory about gamma ray bursts posits the notion that the
bursts are in a tightly focused beam.
Given the observational data...
o redshift
o brightness
o duration
o conservation laws

supports the idea of focused beam of supernovae or hypernovae. With
billions of galaxies are the rates of supernovae... we would expect
a reasonable number of observations of these events at great distances.

Both soft *and* hard?

I think it is accepted that soft GRBs have a supernova origin, but I
didn't think a consensus has been formed on the origin of hard GRBs
yet...

I'd like to think with all the deep field imagery out there, we would
have had at least one before-and-after set of images for a hard GRB.

Eric--Thanks for waking me up! The very short bursts are thought to
arise from collisions between a black hole and a neutron star or between
two neutron stars.http://www.physlink.com/News/051009GammaRayBursts.cfm

I'll have to look for the pre prints

It can't be black holes, as they are impossibil [as are black bodies].

http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+doubt+deathblows

They are dark stars, as far as preonic collapsars.

-Aut

shuuuuuut up

nobody cares about what you have to say

.

Relevant Pages