Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: Mitchell Jones <mjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:06:50 -0500
In article <1179034942.022503.115060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
There is no continuum
***{Hi Aut. :-) For the record, the term "continuity" used in the phrase
"principle of continuity" refers to the continuity of motion--i.e., to
the fact that there are no breaks in the pathway followed by an object
in motion: no points at which the path ends; no points at which it
begins. Multiple pathways can merge together, in cases where an object
is assembled from preexisting parts, and single pathways can split into
multiple threads, in cases where objects are disassembled into parts;
but the pathways themselves have no beginning and no end. That's what I
mean when I say that "no thing may come into existence out of nothing or
vanish into nothing." The principle of continuity, in short, is a
statement about the paths through space taken by objects in motion, and
implies that the universe has always existed, and will always exist.
Existents within it can change their forms according to the physical
laws that define the nature of things, but cannot be created or
destroyed. --MJ}***
; however there is a discretum of aitiolòjies
with partial states.
to wit: the collapse of the entire structure of human
knowledge--it follows that the principle of continuity must be true.
Q.E.D.
Wrong. QM tells everything we can know about the world on a subatomic
level.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/SED
***{I think the link you wanted was
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_electrodynamics. Using "SED" as
the search argument leads to multiple hits, and generates a
"disambiguation" page. It's a good link, in that it shows that there are
serious people around who are trying to approach "QM" problems from a
rationalist perspective, and, in particular, that such an approach
requires an awareness that the "vacuum" is, in fact, filled with
material capable of functioning as the sources of things that are
sometimes falsely claimed to have popped into and out of existence.
--MJ}***
-Aut
*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: The_Man
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- References:
- Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: rAgAv
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: Mitchell Jones
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: The_Man
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: Mitchell Jones
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: The_Man
- Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Please help me with the verification of this law
- Prev by Date: Re: rainbows
- Next by Date: Re: Gauss' Law and spheres
- Previous by thread: Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- Next by thread: Re: Please help me with the verification of this law
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|