Re: More Reasons "Peak Oil" is a Crock

In article <1179577637.976509.166160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On May 19, 6:46 pm, mme...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In article <6e2b5593f7bd9587b72889d960143...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonym...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

I don't see why running out of oil is a problem. There will be a scramble
to bring new technologies on line. People who work in the oil business
will work in the photovotaic business or the wind-generation business.

Eventually, we'll all drive cars powered by something other than gasoline.
In the meantime, instead of driving the car to the corner grocery, we'll
walk or use a bicycle.

Sure, food will be more expensive for a while, but it's dirt-cheap now, so
no one will go hungry.

Broadband networks and tele-commuting may get a shot in the arm.

The air will be cleaner.

What's the big deal?

Well, to put it in mild terms.

The world, prior to the Industrial revolution and the availability of
energy to do all our bidding supported a population of about 1-1.5
billion people.

The current population of the world is above 6 billion.

Remove the cheap and abundant energy en we're back to a world that can
support 1-1.5 billion people.

Oil is in abundance and obsolete.

***{If you are referring to the role of hydrocarbons in energy
production, you are certainly right: hydrocarbons are abundant, but
nuclear power, if freed of regulatory constraints, would be a vastly
lower cost energy source, and safer in every way. However, a huge
petroleum industry would remain even if nuclear power were to dominate
the energy markets, because the world would still depend on petroleum
based solvents, paints, lacquers, printing inks, lubricating oils,
greases, candy, packaging, candles, matches, polishes, petrolatum,
asphalt, roofing materials, floor coverings, petroleum coke, carbon and
graphite products, furnace electrodes and liners, the carbon anodes used
in aluminum production, and feedstocks for the manufacture of chemicals,
synthetic rubber, and plastics. [See
http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/petroleumproducts.htm.] --MJ}***

Solar energy can trivially power 20
(if not more) Earth economies without any problems.

***{Solar energy, in my view, can't get the job done at reasonable
costs, but there is no need to argue about it. If property rights were
respected, lots of methods would be tried, and the low cost producers
would win the competitive race, relegating other methods to niche
markets. I expect that nuclear would win that race hands down, but it
isn't a real issue if we let the market decide. --MJ}***

Only (here is a problem) you can't really expect the supefluous 4- 4.5
billion just lie down and die, can you.

The real problem for you Jewish-extremists is that the world economy
is about to eclipse your capacity to control it via your fraudulent
banking systems and vicious political manipulation. That's why the
Jewish International Bankers want to limit industrial capacity of all
nations (via the CO2 Hoax) and why they constantly peddle their 90%
world population-reduction hatred.

***{There are about 13 million Jews on this planet, which has a total
population of about 6.5 billion. The Jewish percentage is therefore
around .2%. Yet somehow they are responsible for all the evil in the
world? They staff all the teaching positions in all the universities of
the world that teach socialist and fascist doctrine? All the communists
are Jews? All the proponents of fiat money are Jews? All the central
bankers, globalists, CFR members, Trilateralists, and assorted other
insane conspiratorial scumbags are Jews?

That is preposterous nonsense. The reality is that the horrible ideas
that are destroying the world are shared by virtually everyone on the
planet. There were, and are, virtually no Jews in China, and yet Mao was
able to lead a successful communist revolution there, precisely
*because* the population was infected with primitive, tribalistic, and
quite insane ideas about the sharing of property, the evil of
selfishness, and so on--in a word: altruism.

What is wrong with those ideas? Simply this: it is impossible to force
people to create, invent, discover, or produce wealth. Being productive
is an incentive driven choice, and the best incentive, the one that
maximizes the rate of production of wealth, hence the rate of progress,
hence the betterment of mankind, is respect for private property rights.
People work to produce things because they want those things, or because
they want to trade them for things produced by others. Trade is the
means, within the ownership system, that the benefits of productive
individuals get passed on to the community as a whole. If the benefits
of productivity get passed to others via voluntary trade--which means:
if people get paid for what they produce--then people will produce more
than they themselves want or need. And if they are simply forced to
"share"--meaning that they are not paid, or are paid less than their
productivity is worth--then over time they will dig in their heels and
produce less, and there isn't a damn thing any government can do, in the
long run, to prevent that from happening.

Thus it is the morality of altruism, which allows scumbags to justify
forcing others to "share," that is destroying the world, and, in
particular, it is the cause underlying the phenomenon of "Peak Oil." It
is simply a fact that, for almost a hundred years, governments have been
seizing the fruits of the labor of the private interests who discovered
and developed the worlds petroleum resources, on precisely those sorts
of grounds, and now the chickens are coming home to roost: the world is
running out of oil, not because it isn't out there, but because only
idiots would invest the time and effort required to replace the existing
resources, and endure the risks, when they know for a fact that they
aren't going to get paid.

--Mitchell Jones}***

I'll leave extrapolating scenarios to you.

OUR VICTORY

***{You aren't going to have any "victory." Jews aren't the problem and
never were. People have submitted to tyranny because they are obsessed
with fitting in, getting along, and being liked by others. Result: they
accept literally insane ideas like altruism, and vote for political
candidates who spew forth such nonsense. Result: we have an out of
control government run by fools who "serve mankind" by trampling over
our property rights. Result: our country, and the civilization of which
it is a part, are coming down. --MJ}***

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
.

Quantcast