Re: my theories

In sci.physics, The_Man
<me_so_horneeeee@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 17 May 2007 11:32:59 -0700
<1179426779.608610.32420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On May 17, 8:42 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 16, 12:53 pm, "T Wake" <usenet.es...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1179289347.499742.60750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On May 16, 1:48 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Filthy trash deleted!

All Eric wrote was:

Stop with the martyr *** - it impresses nobody.

Did you misread it?

I was disappointed to see that "T Wake"
did not perceive
that I was giving Gisse a little "tit for tat".

See, you complain about "vulgarity", yet it is you who first uses the
word "tit."

The word has multiple meanings. A tit in this context
does not have anything to do with human anatomy (female
or otherwise), or even birds.

An earlier variant of the phrase apparently was "a tip for tap".

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19960729



Gisse deletes the content of posts that he
is incapable of addressing (Most posts),
and making open loop comments
that don't address the issue in play,
usually childish, vulgar, one line comments.

He has tried to explain the science to you, but you are simply too
stupid to understand. It would be more productive to explain QM to a
hamster.


QM would be a bit hard to explain even to a human
teenager. :-) However, the predicted results are
consistent with observations (at least, AFAIK), so college
students will have to continue to study it, until something
better comes along.

--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Insert random misquote here.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Quantcast