Re: Friction
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 09:45:04 -0700
On May 31, 8:28 am, kd <kaustu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why is rolling friction much less than sliding friction though we know
that friction is independent of area
It's not. Rolling friction is *larger* than sliding friction. As an
example of that, a car hitting a curve can make the turn successfully
on dry pavement by using rolling friction. However, as soon as the
wheels start to skid (for any reason), sliding friction is not capable
of keeping the car turning, and the car ends up going straight into
the guardrail.
Now, that's probably not what you meant. You probably meant why do we
use wheels rather than skids for cars. And *that's* because the
sliding friction between axles and wheels (at the bearings) is much
less than the sliding friction between skids and pavement.
PD
.
- References:
- Friction
- From: kd
- Friction
- Prev by Date: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity Based on Absolute Motion.
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation of angular momentum
- Previous by thread: Re: Friction
- Next by thread: Re: Peak-Oil is fact. charcoal for morons
- Index(es):