Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bialek@xxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:31:59 +0200
"Ken S. Tucker"
"Szczepan Bialek"
Ladies and Gents we need to understand H2O better.
Ladies and Gents understand H2O satisfactorily.
See:http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/531/2
Interesting article. I'd like to suggest a few points,
see what you guys think,
1) Warmer air can hold more water vapor.
2) The water cycle of evaporation to rain is powered
by the Sun.
3) As the Sun warms up it warms up the Earth and
the water cycle is energized.
4) An energized water cycle results from a warm Sun.
5) Water vapor is a GreenHouse Gas.
That's to start...let's look at Dr. Bialek's other points.
They should understand better the SO2 and fly ash. You have more water in
the air (sticky) because in the air is lack of the natural nuclei for
rain:
SO2 and fly ash. They are removed from the smoke in the all wealthy
country.
I think your thesis is that pollution dry's the air by
providing "nucleating dust" for rain and snow,
The first step are clouds. The rain and snow fall or not. It depends on
additional factors.
that's agreeable, so we have a complicating factor like,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo#Global_effects
So you have clean air but sticky.
6) At some point, the energized water cycle should
produce a "negative" feed-back" by increased cloud
that reflects sunlight.
In normal natural conditions when the SO2 and fly ash are in air. Now we
have the sticky air and decreased cloud (about 4%).
7) Dr. Bialek points out that pollution (dust) is rather
like "cloud seeding" effectively destroying clouds and
partially inhibiting the negative feed-back that clouds
provide to cool the Earth.
The natural constituents of the smoke from burning of biomas are not like
the artifical dust used in clouds destroing.
Ladies and Gents we need to understand SO2 and fly ash better.
The most important is to know that the ash is alkaline and SO2 acidic. Then
they are together no acid rain. People started with remowing of ash. In the
result the acid rain appeared.
Regards
S* (without Dr)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- References:
- GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Szczepan Bialek
- Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- Prev by Date: Re: Friction
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation of angular momentum
- Previous by thread: Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- Next by thread: Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|