Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Crash Street Kidd <crashstreetkidd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:12:58 -0700
On Jun 1, 1:57 pm, Dwib <dwibd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 1, 12:03 pm, Igor <thoov...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Water vapor is indeed a greenhouse gas, but the amount in the
atmosphere continually fluctuates even on a daily basis. If carbon
dioxide did the same, it probably wouldn't be as much of a problem.
I got into a discussion with someone about CO2 being a greenhouse gas
but he stumped me with a comment about "saturation".
CO2 has these huge absorption bands in the IR but (and I'm looking at
my super-duper atmospheric spectrum wall chart) it's a BIG
absorption. I mean, it looks like CO2 is absorbing 99.999% of the IR
light. So what does it matter if CO2 concentrations go up and the
absorption increases to 99.9999%?
I didn't know how to counter this arguement. Any ideas? Or is this
guy correct and CO2 conc. is a paper tiger?
CO2 concentration increases with temperature and not vice versa.
CSK
Dwib
.
- References:
- GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Igor
- Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- From: Dwib
- GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- Prev by Date: Re: Friction
- Next by Date: Usenutters earn/spend virtual cash.
- Previous by thread: Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- Next by thread: Re: GreenHouse Gas, H2O?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|