Re: System boundary
- From: schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:03:10 -0700
On Jun 7, 6:43 am, Haines Brown <bro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Well, your babble-generator certainly starts easily with a light pull,
doesn't it? You've read too much and learned too little. It might be
useful to talk with a *physicist* to understand the difference between
a system boundary and where a boundary condition applies. Those are
two different contexts that are sometimes but not often connected.
OK, since you are making a pronoucement on elementary physics, and you
feel that only physicists are in a position to do so, I can only infer
you are a physicist. As such you are in a position to define boundary
and boundary condition. Please do so.
You judge a plant by its fruit. How can anyone that did not
immediately realize the Apollo moon landings were faked be a
physicist?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: System boundary
- From: PD
- Re: System boundary
- References:
- System boundary
- From: Haines Brown
- Re: System boundary
- From: PD
- Re: System boundary
- From: Haines Brown
- Re: System boundary
- From: PD
- Re: System boundary
- From: Haines Brown
- System boundary
- Prev by Date: Quantum Gravity 154.4: Gravity/Expansion Interpretation of P- and P ' - Independence/Dependence
- Next by Date: Charge renormalisation and running
- Previous by thread: Re: System boundary
- Next by thread: Re: System boundary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|