sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Simple, Inexpensive Refractometer to Test Large Glass Blank
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 168.4: Mini- and Maxi- Black Holes Without General Relativity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.3: U. Missouri Replaces Averages By Sequences of Segments
  • From: Dear Leader
• Quantum Gravity 168.3: U. Missouri Replaces Averages By Sequences of Segments
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Shubee, Koobee Wublee, Pentcho Valev (3 Stooges?)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Simple, Inexpensive Refractometer to Test Large Glass Blank
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Thoughts of an astronomy master [Michael Rowan-Robinson]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Big science needs vacuum innovation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: emr model
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: please help.. (angular momenum)
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: hanson
• Re: concervation of angular momentum
  • From: PD
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: PD
• please help.. (angular momenum)
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: emr model
  • From: malibu
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jimp
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Quantum Gravity 168.2: UCLA on Other Additive Decompositions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Greg Neill
• Shubee, Koobee Wublee, Pentcho Valev (3 Stooges?)
  • From: Brutus
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jcon
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Tnec
• Quantum Gravity 168.1: Hadamard Matrices in Cross-Phase Desingularizing/Decoding
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Thoughts of an astronomy master
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Thoughts of an astronomy master
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Thoughts of an astronomy master
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Thoughts of an astronomy master [Michael Rowan-Robinson]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Big science needs vacuum innovation
  • From: jimp
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Solbek
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Superconductivity - Is it still being pursued?
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Big science needs vacuum innovation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 168.0: Cross-Phase Desingularizing/Decoding
  • From: Dear Leader
• Quantum Gravity 168.0: Cross-Phase Desingularizing/Decoding
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why is air cooler at higher elevations?
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: John Park
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Filling a bottle of water
  • From: RCA
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: emr model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: boson boss
• emr model
  • From: malibu
• Re: concervation of angular momentum
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Definition of bursting strenght, tear strength, tensile strength
  • From: CWatters
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: srp
• Re: Major K00kfroth from Art Deco
  • From: hanson
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: hanson
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: NASA Robots Practice Moon Survey in the Arctic Circle
  • From: Uncle Al
• Definition of bursting strenght, tear strength, tensile strength
  • From: Timo
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Des
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: boson boss
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Des
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Sam Wormley
• NASA Robots Practice Moon Survey in the Arctic Circle
  • From: julianphilip . enc
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Des
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Time doesn't exist - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: Phantom scojocupcake
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jul 30, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_koz ów
• Re: 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• 3 blocks and 2 masses
  • From: pogromca_kozłów
• Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
  • From: Militant Atheist
• Re: Watergateist Manifesto
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Filling a bottle of water
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Filling a bottle of water
  • From: RCA
• Filling a bottle of water
  • From: RCA
• Racial Eugenics in Israel
  • From: Charles . Wong . 14
• Re: A Challenge To My "SPIN IS IN THEORY"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Challenge To My "SPIN IS IN THEORY"
  • From: BURT
• Re: Reality blinks on and off, why not?
  • From: Des
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: john_morriss
• Re: Quantum Gravity 167.9: Approximation Across Phases (Superluminal vs Subluminal)
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: John Park
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: Uncle Al
• concervation of angular momentum
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Quantum Gravity 167.9: Approximation Across Phases (Superluminal vs Subluminal)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: Androcles
• I'm minding my own biz...*POW!*... I'm hit with a photon I just know was going over the speed limit !!!
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncertainty Principle
  • From: malibu
• Re: Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: An idle question...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: An idle question...
  • From: Edward Green
• A Challenge To My "SPIN IS IN THEORY"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Who will be the next President of the USA
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Tom Potter, Brad Guth, Schoenfeld... look who is instigating!... ahaha..
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: Externet
• Quantum Gravity 167.8: Some Misunderstandings of (Tachyon and other) Instability
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: hanson
• Feasibility and costs associated with a small windmill
  • From: Stem sells
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Naughty magnet
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: BioFreak
• Naughty magnet
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Using a laser to facilitate H-H fusion within Earth's troposphere.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Saltwater Burns
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Saltwater Burns
  • From: Citizen Bob
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: The_Man
• Quantum Gravity 167.7: 11204 Papers on Phase in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Using a laser to facilitate H-H fusion within Earth's troposphere.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Split Faraday's Law
  • From: Benj
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in specia...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Split Faraday's Law
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Saltwater Burns
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Split Faraday's Law
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Stunting Growth: Ozone will trim plants' carbon-storing power
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Using a laser to facilitate H-H fusion within Earth's troposphere.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: Magnetic field of a solenoid
  • From: Joerg
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Tnec
• Re: Reactance and apparent power
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stunting Growth: Ozone will trim plants' carbon-storing power
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: BioFreak
• Time Travel- is it possible
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• A Invention- Hydrogen Disolusion- is it possible
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: What if (on quasars great energy)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: What is Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Reactance and apparent power
  • From: Bob Cain
• Quantum Gravity 167.6: How Tachyons Were Misinterpreted
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stunting Growth: Ozone will trim plants' carbon-storing power
  • From: Benj
• Re: Stunting Growth: Ozone will trim plants' carbon-storing power
  • From: jimp
• Stunting Growth: Ozone will trim plants' carbon-storing power
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. ParkFriday, 27 Jul 07 Washington,DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: AmigaJoe
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: AmigaJoe
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: OT: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: OT: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 167.5: The Latest Results on Superluminality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Eric Gisse
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: One final point on CMBR
  • From: George Dishman
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: Michael Asherman
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 834 July 27, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: srp
• Re: Reactance and apparent power
  • From: Sue...
• Does the weight/mass of a capacitor change charged/discharged state?
  • From: AmigaJoe
• Re: Difference b/w Boltzmann and Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Difference b/w Boltzmann and Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Difference b/w Boltzmann and Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
  • From: shehry
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Einstein’s derived mathematical equation for Newton’s 200 years old perception, of conversion of light energy to mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Einstein’s derived mathematical equation for Newton’s 200 years old perception, of conversion of light energy to mass
  • From: fleesow
• Re: What if (on quasars great energy)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: hanson
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: The_Man
• Silanes vs. Ethanolamines for functionalizing glass
  • From: sanjeevi.sivasankar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• quantum porche mechanics.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: hanson
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: hanson
• Re: Certain Models of Quantum Theory are Mathematical Monsters
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Team sets solar cell record of 42.8 percent efficiency
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: Dear Leader @ Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Graphene oxide weaved into 'paper'
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Uncle Al
• Lorentz Invariance on Tria
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Using a laser to facilitate gluon-jets on Earth.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mystery Metal
  • From: John Park
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: srp
• Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
  • From: galathaea
• The problems of physical time. Now full translation
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: blackhead
• Big Time Kudos to/for SAM WORMLEY
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Physics of cat that can smell death (from CNN)
  • From: warden
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 167.4: Tachyons May Be Different Phases
  • From: Dear Leader @ Ryugyong Hotel
• Certain Models of Quantum Theory are Mathematical Monsters
  • From: Ben
• Re: Understanding Physics / Computer Science
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Treatment of normal modes in Finite Element Method
  • From: ganesh
• Treatment of normal modes in Finite Element Method
  • From: ganesh
• What if (on quasars great energy)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 167.4: Tachyons May Be Different Phases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: I use English, Gisse, that's a standard.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: I use English, Gisse, that's a standard.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Pentcho Valev and the constancy of the speed of light in special relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I use English, Gisse, that's a standard.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jimp
• I use English, Gisse, that's a standard.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jcon
• Re: Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: srp
• Is B just that part of E that does no work?
  • From: blackhead
• Consuming more means dying sooner.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Atoms swap spins
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Why doesn't an underflow ( e.g. X *= 0 ) bring down the house ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Graphene oxide weaved into 'paper'
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: visit new videos of http://fabian20077.blogspot.com/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• visit new videos of http://fabian20077.blogspot.com/
  • From: THE FUTURE LIC.IN PHYSICS
• Re: Graphene oxide weaved into 'paper'
  • From: jimp
• Atoms swap spins
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Graphene oxide weaved into 'paper'
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Understanding Physics / Computer Science
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Across the Open Borders With Light (Humor)
  • From: OsherD
• The problems of physical time. Now full translation
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Denormalized floats, flagged by _clearfp(), are pseudo floats.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Piezoelectric transducer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Correct expression for the partition function
  • From: shehry
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Piezoelectric transducer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Renewable energy wrecks environment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Team sets solar cell record of 42.8 percent efficiency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Piezoelectric transducer
  • From: arjav1ec
• Renewable energy wrecks environment
  • From: john . iddikkula
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• "Selecting synchronous terms" in wave equations
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Physics of Treason
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Androcles
• The Physics of Treason
  • From: hetware
• Team sets solar cell record of 42.8 percent efficiency
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 167.3: A "Breathing Universe" Axiom
  • From: OsherD
• Some glasses form when their constituents lock together over long distances
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Paradox: stars revolving in 24 hours.
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Phenomenological Existentialism is a cartoon for Chimps.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Phenomenological Existentialism is a cartoon for Chimps.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Propel tiny polystyrene balls in a hydrogen-peroxide solution
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Phenomenological Existentialism is a cartoon for Chimps.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Re: Paradox: stars revolving in 24 hours.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Paradox: stars revolving in 24 hours.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Paradox: stars revolving in 24 hours.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: jimp
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Need journal for a short letter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Re: Paradox: stars revolving in 24 hours.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Paradox: stars revolving in 24 hours.
  • From: ongeluk
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Re: Mathematical Speckle
  • From: Androcles
• Re: QUANTUM WEIRDNESS
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Mathematical Speckle
  • From: linerz11
• Need journal for a short letter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: America Needs More Joan of Arcs...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Dark-energy teams win cosmology prize
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Quantum Gravity 167.2: Rebuilding Best Case Scenarios
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: THE DESIGN- A Free Yield weapon- an extra ten fold reaction
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Nice article in NY Times: At Fermilab, the Race Is on for the 'God Particle'
  • From: hanson
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: QUANTUM WEIRDNESS
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• QUANTUM WEIRDNESS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jcon
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jcon
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Tina
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Androcles
• Nice article in NY Times: At Fermilab, the Race Is on for the 'God Particle'
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Quantum Gravity 167.2: Rebuilding Best Case Scenarios
  • From: OsherD
• Re: THE DESIGN- A Free Yield weapon- an extra ten fold reaction
  • From: Tapeworm III
• " FLT_MIN " is " 1.175494351e-38F ".
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: jimp
• return _clearfp(), _isnan( X ) || _clearfp();
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: jimp
• The Power to Influence Showers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Make that: " return _clearfp(), _isnan( X ) || _clearfp(); ".
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• int Absurd ( float X ) { return _isnan( X ) || _clearfp(); }
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: What is really weird...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• I ( incorrectly ) thought " nybble " was spelled " nibble ".
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Tina
• More Jokes about Science and Fish
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Sam Wormley
• THE DESIGN- A Free Yield weapon- an extra ten fold reaction
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A Thermonuclear Desgin Challenge
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Thermonuclear Weapons Abberation
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• H- Hydrogen Interaction Methods
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: H
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: " 2^-128 == 0 " is not a reason to use Solaris on your desktop.
  • From: jimp
• H
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jimp
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: An idle question...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jcon
• Re: For " int's ", " 2^-1 = 0 ".
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: malibu
• Re: The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: jimp
• " float " can't distinguish between a zero and a 2^-128 ( or a 2^-999 ).
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• " 2^-128 == 0 " is not a reason to use Solaris on your desktop.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• I like taxation.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The magic of a Prius automobile
  • From: Tina
• Re: Physics and Music
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: For " int's ", " 2^-1 = 0 ".
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: jimp
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: greysky
• Zippos give plenty of heat/light at a flick.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Ghost, In what way is " 2^-128 != 0 " ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• For " int's ", " 2^-1 = 0 ".
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: One final point on CMBR
  • From: Chalky
• Re: One final point on CMBR
  • From: Chalky
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: CWatters
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jul 23, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Pmb
• FAQ for "Bell's Spaceship Paradox"
  • From: JMD
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: dogma
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Time is probabilistic.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Free expansion of Ideal vs. Real Gases
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• A " float " set to zero is actually: " 2^-128 ".
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: dh003i
• Re: An idle question...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THERE IS NO CREATION , ONLY CONSTANT EVOLUTION
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Do Neutrinos Weigh more Than the rest of the Universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.91: Causation in Backward and Forward Time Travel
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Excellent approach to physics
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Math Tables
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Math Tables
  • From: PureOne
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: Tina
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: dh003i
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: CWatters
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Physics of latex / memory foam mattresses
  • From: dh003i
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: An idle question...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THERE IS NO CREATION , ONLY CONSTANT EVOLUTION
  • From: malibu
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• An idle question...
  • From: Edward Green
• E-MEDISYS 2007 . Fez , Morocco , October 24-26, 2007
  • From: E-MEDISYS
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Quantum Gravity 167.1: Solution To Quantum Gravity Via Unlimited Light Speed
  • From: OsherD
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: malibu
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Lasers are predictable so meters and seconds are the same thing.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: The_Man
• Quantum Gravity 167.0: Special Relativity is the "Worst Case" Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• It takes brains to spend less; it's fun, but it's not for the weak.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Potter, Brad Guth, Schoenfeld... look who is instigating!... ahaha..
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Tom Potter, Brad Guth, Schoenfeld... look who is instigating!... ahaha..
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: mark
• Re: a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J., What does " on a bike and a bag " mean ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• a little help? classical mechanics, torque and friction, rotation
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.91: Causation in Backward and Forward Time Travel
  • From: Traveler
• T.J., What does " on a bike and a bag " mean ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: malibu
• Amatuer Q : tiny black hole
  • From: mark
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Quantum Gravity 166.91: Causation in Backward and Forward Time Travel
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is it millimeters or inches ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: Earle Jones
• Quantum Gravity 166.9: Why You Can't Undo Your Own Birth Back In Time etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is it millimeters or inches ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is it millimeters or inches ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: compressing low pressure steam
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.8: Stanford Philosophers Criticize Cosmic Censorship
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.8: Stanford Philosophers Criticize Cosmic Censorship
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.8: Stanford Philosophers Criticize Cosmic Censorship
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 166.8: Stanford Philosophers Criticize Cosmic Censorship
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Is it millimeters or inches ?
  • From: The_Man
• Re: criticism of Uncertainty Principle
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Scott H
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• compressing low pressure steam
  • From: Laurent
• Free expansion of Ideal vs. Real Gases
  • From: renai
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: hanson
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: hanson
• Re: Joule Thompson Effect and Isenthalpic Expansion
  • From: renai
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: T.J., We might meet around October or so ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., We might meet around October or so ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., We might meet around October or so ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.7: Difficulties With Cosmic Censorship and Chronology Protection Conjectures
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: T.J., We might meet around October or so ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 166.7: Difficulties With Cosmic Censorship and Chronology Protection Conjectures
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Quantum Gravity 166.7: "Constant Light Speed" As Space-Domination of Light
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: Szczepan Bialek
• Re: Casimir effect
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Outside the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How constant is constant and speed of light?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Dimensions of spinors
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.6: White Holes via Linde, Strominger, Hawking, Thorne
  • From: malibu
• Petition to bring the Electric Car back to the Retail Market.
  • From: ImperialShark
• Majorana flip identities
  • From: Barrow
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: jimp
• Quantum Gravity 166.6: White Holes via Linde, Strominger, Hawking, Thorne
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: Benj
• Dimensions of spinors
  • From: Barrow
• The Power of Induction: Cutting the last cord could...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Eienstine Space time Theory.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How constant is constant and speed of light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light with Expanding Universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Liquid jets bounce along (Jul 19)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reply To Uncle Al
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Location of 1927 Solvay Conference?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- July 19, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: The_Man
• Location of 1927 Solvay Conference?
  • From: kittencare
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Time seems directional when we can't predict the furture.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Stuart Lavin
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: Stuart Lavin
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed of Light with Expanding Universe?
  • From: smallpond
• Re: How constant is constant and speed of light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PID , PIDD and ART computation
  • From: di@po
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Scott H
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Scott H
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How constant is constant and speed of light?
  • From: Satan's cabana boy
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Problem of what ether is, solved, but it is expensive stuff!
  • From: wind
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.5: White Holes and Black Holes
  • From: malibu
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Speed of Light with Expanding Universe?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Physics Question?
  • From: Sanny
• FA Half Hours with Microscope vintage microscopy Lankester 1906
  • From: Janey
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: rick_sobie
• How constant is constant and speed of light?
  • From: DDP3000
• Quantum Gravity 166.5: White Holes and Black Holes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: The Electrical GRID causing Global Warming
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: KD
• Re: Eienstine Space time Theory.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Nanostructures help mosquitoes walk on water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physics Question?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Eienstine Space time Theory.
  • From: KD
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Eienstine Space time Theory.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Reply To Uncle Al
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Outside the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: roger
• Re: Physics Question?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Physics Question?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Is gravity real?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Sanny
• Eienstine Space time Theory.
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Where Eric Gisse and Randy Poe live ( together, I presume )...
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Is time real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Is time real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Is gravity real?
  • From: DDP3000
• Re: Joule Thompson Effect and Isenthalpic Expansion
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Religion or Science. Which is more cool?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: PID , PIDD and ART computation
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Quantum Gravity 166.4: Quantum "ghosts" as Points, Materialization, Axion-like Particles, Outliers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: roger
• Quantum Gravity 166.3: Comparing dy/dt = ky and y = exp(kt) As Linear vs Exponential
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 166.2: Time Simultaneity in Why (Probable) Causation Relates To Memory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A New Twist on the Möbius Strip
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sir Isaac Newton, and inter-conversion of mass - energy (E=mc2 )
  • From: fleesow
• Re: Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Re: Reply To Uncle Al
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: Reply To Uncle Al
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physics Question?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physics Question?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Reply To Uncle Al
  • From: OsherD
• Joule Thompson Effect and Isenthalpic Expansion
  • From: renai
• Physics Question?
  • From: budgetcomputer
• Re: Proof Of Evolution.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: PD
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Igor
• Re: Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where Eric Gisse and Randy Poe live ( together, I presume )...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photon a helix?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How can you estimate mass of supermassive blackholes located in centers of some galaxies?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Test
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Test
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• T.J., We might meet around October or so ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• A WorkLife FrameWork 2.0 for Mathematica released by Scientific Arts, LLC
  • From: dbreiss
• Re: sci.physics
  • From: roger
• Re: Dark-energy teams win cosmology prize
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physics and Music
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Einstein's leadership
  • From: OG
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: How does one get evicted from the Portal Of Evil ?
  • From: StarbladeEnkai
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: OG
• Re: Physics and Music
  • From: hanson
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: roger
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: roger
• Re: Physics and Music
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: T.J., if you send me tickets or something...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Properties of Free Space
  • From: OG
• Many-Worlds and the Origin of Life in the Universe
  • From: Scott H
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Properties of Free Space
  • From: roger
• Re: The strange quantum phenomenon known as supersolidity
  • From: malibu
• Re: Physics and Music
  • From: siren
• Re: The strange quantum phenomenon known as supersolidity
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• The Universe is not a handy 1 pound container.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Physics and Music
  • From: Uncle Al
• Nanostructures help mosquitoes walk on water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Louis Essen "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"
  • From: roger
• sci.physics
  • From: malibu
• Re: Dark-energy teams win cosmology prize
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physics and Music
  • From: Jong Kim
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Luj
• Re: photon a helix?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photon a helix?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: How much would a pound of microwaves cost ?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: How much would a pound of microwaves cost ?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Outside the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: photon a helix?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photon a helix?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon model
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Teaching Physics in the UK...
  • From: malibu
• Re: The strange quantum phenomenon known as supersolidity
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• photon a helix?
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon model
  • From: malibu
• Where Eric Gisse and Randy Poe live ( together, I presume )...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Optical fiber experiment detects light speed anisotropy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: P.M.B., I sent you mail.
  • From: Pmb
• P.M.B., I sent you mail.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: guskz
• T.J., if you send me tickets or something...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Dark-energy teams win cosmology prize
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How can you estimate mass of supermassive blackholes located in centers of some galaxies?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sir Isaac Newton, and inter-conversion of mass – energy (E=mc2 )
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sir Isaac Newton, and inter-conversion of mass – energy (E=mc2 )
  • From: fleesow
• How can you estimate mass of supermassive blackholes located in centers of some galaxies?
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J., Are you popping Oxycontin ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I'll visit Cleveland, if...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Test
  • From: Uncle Al
• Test
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 165.0: Time-Space Asymmetry in Riccati/Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Casimir effect
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Casimir effect
  • From: kaplanal
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Dark-energy teams win cosmology prize
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: hanson
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Michael Moroney
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: EskWIRED
• Re: The strange quantum phenomenon known as supersolidity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The strange quantum phenomenon known as supersolidity
  • From: malibu
• Re: Ahhh Eric Gisse still a BLIND NITWIT>????
  • From: Igor
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Tom Potter
• The strange quantum phenomenon known as supersolidity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Tom Potter
• Teaching Physics in the UK...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: tareq . ams
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: BioFreak
• Ahhh Eric Gisse still a BLIND NITWIT>????
  • From: guskz
• Ahhh Eric Gisse still a BLIND NITWIT>????
  • From: guskz
• Re: electroMagnetic fields ( e.m.f. ) induce ElectroMotive Force ( e.m.f. ).
  • From: guskz
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: The Secret Campaign To Deny Global Warming
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electroMagnetic fields ( e.m.f. ) induce ElectroMotive Force ( e.m.f. ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Pioneer anomaly is due to the characteristics of the space itself (differing permittivity)S
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: electroMagnetic fields ( e.m.f. ) induce ElectroMotive Force ( e.m.f. ).
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: electroMagnetic fields ( e.m.f. ) induce ElectroMotive Force ( e.m.f. ).
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: srp
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Econophysics
  • From: Gunnar Kaestle
• electroMagnetic fields ( e.m.f. ) induce ElectroMotive Force ( e.m.f. ).
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Randy Poe, Do you also think eating is unrelated to living ?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: CURVED SPACE STARS CONSTELLATIONS
  • From: BURT
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: srp
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: srp
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: hanson
• Re: Like Randy Poe and Eric Gisse, magnetism and voltage are related.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Like Randy Poe and Eric Gisse, magnetism and voltage are related.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: photon model
  • From: malibu
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What makes you think magnetic force is unrelated to voltage ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Voltage is completely unrelated to magnetic force ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: John Park
• CURVED SPACE STARS CONSTELLATIONS
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• What makes you think magnetic force is unrelated to voltage ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Randy Poe, Do you also think eating is unrelated to living ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: srp
• Randy Poe, Do you also think eating is unrelated to living ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: srp
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: hanson
• Re: A Message From The Future.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A Message From The Future.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: transparency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: transparency
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: photon model
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transparency
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Luj
• Re: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: Igor
• Re: photon model
  • From: Igor
• T.J., Are you popping Oxycontin ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Is it millimeters or inches ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• I'll visit Cleveland, if...
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Create the life that you desire
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Everyone gets evicted, some do it with more style.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
  • From: John Park
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Real value of c = 299733463.58589089 ?
  • From: roger
• Re: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: I'm not talking Hennessy XO Cognac served by a sexy chick.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Secret Campaign To Deny Global Warming
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Everyone's just writing about what's on their minds... Duh !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: T.J., why not hook me up ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: I'm not talking Hennessy XO Cognac served by a sexy chick.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Everyone gets evicted, some do it with more style.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: The ElectroMotive Force that turns a compass needle.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electroMagneticly induced ElectroMotive Force won't turn a compass needle ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
  • From: andyeverett57
• Re: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time travel into the future
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: Jim Black
• electroMagneticly induced ElectroMotive Force won't turn a compass needle ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: The_Man
• The ElectroMotive Force that turns a compass needle.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Einstein's leadership
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Potter, Brad Guth, Schoenfeld... look who is instigating!... ahaha..
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: malibu
• Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
  • From: CH
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: guskz
• Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: guskz
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: The_Man
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: malibu
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Tom Potter, Brad Guth, Schoenfeld... look who is instigating!... ahaha..
  • From: hanson
• Re: pick a power
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Piezoelectric transducer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: malibu
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: srp
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon model
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon model
  • From: Igor
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: malibu
• I'm not talking Hennessy XO Cognac served by a sexy chick.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Mr. Man, I'm not your bitch.
  • From: The_Man
• Mr. Man, I'm not your bitch.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• electroMagnetic induction.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Einstein's leadership
  • From: J0N
• Re: Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: malibu
• Pete, Put me in your " Contacts " list at HotMail.COM .
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Pete, Did you get my emails ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Pete, I sent you an email.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Pete, I sent you an email.
  • From: Pmb
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Erac
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Erac
• Oklahoma City Bombing "Conspiracy" Debunked
  • From: The_Man
• Re: The twin paradox revisited
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Electrical GRID causing Global Warming
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How Old is our Universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Piezoelectric transducer
  • From: arjav1ec
• Re: Irregardless of life's lotto, consuming more means dying sooner.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
  • From: andyeverett57
• Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Irregardless of life's lotto, consuming more means dying sooner.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Do electroMagnetic fields impart force ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Pete, I sent you an email.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity 166.0: PI Ties In With Fibonacci, Tribonacci, Tetranacci, Pentanacci, Hexanacci, Heptanacci, etc. Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 166.1: Why (Probable) Causation Relates To Memory
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 166.0: PI Ties In With Fibonacci, Tribonacci, Tetranacci, Pentanacci, Hexanacci, Heptanacci, etc. Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon model
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: photon model
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Einstein's Relativity Principle
  • From: BURT
• Re: photon model
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sh_t just is, the cosmos is immobile.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
  • From: Dwib
• Re: photon model
  • From: malibu
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: photon model
  • From: malibu
• Re: I've been coding my ass off.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Everyone gets evicted, some do it with more style.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
  • From: andyeverett57
• Everyone gets evicted, some do it with more style.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: photon model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• photon model
  • From: malibu
• I've been coding my ass off.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: My worst habits are VC++, Usenet, food and cigarettes.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My worst habits are VC++, Usenet, food and cigarettes.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: yes
  • From: The_Man
• Re: An Amusing Statement About Scientific Accuracty
  • From: The_Man
• Gisse's hella funny !
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: BURT
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: BURT
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: BURT
• NASA is a Republican Slush Fund
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sh_t just is, the cosmos is immobile.
  • From: guskz
• Re: Sh_t just is, the cosmos is immobile.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• An Amusing Statement About Scientific Accuracty
  • From: javawizard
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Gordon
• Re: What's beyond the edge of universe ? Another dimension. Question that should be ask is...
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's beyond the edge of universe ? Another dimension. Question that should be ask is...
  • From: aegis
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: aegis
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What's beyond the edge of universe ? Another dimension. Question that should be ask is...
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: aegis
• Sh_t just is, the cosmos is immobile.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Few religions are as family-centric as Mormonism.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: intrinsic energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: tareq . ams
• intrinsic energy
  • From: aegis
• Online Segment - NOVA: CERN
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tiny organisms move microstructures
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Ralph
• Chameleon for Optoelectronics
  • From: diyakimble
• My worst habits are VC++, Usenet, food and cigarettes.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Erac
• Re: Cooked tuna should be taxed at 1.1 thousand percent.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Yer a new-age polygamist, Dr. Tao, the new sheik.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Yer a new-age polygamist, Dr. Tao, the new sheik.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Information content of a helium balloon
  • From: kunzmilan
• Yer a new-age polygamist, Dr. Tao, the new sheik.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Uncle Al's homegirl needs to lower her booze-tolerance a bit.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Gisse and Wormley should follow my advice about how to " rank players ".
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The best way to rank players.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• How does one get evicted from the Portal Of Evil ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Cooked tuna should be taxed at 1.1 thousand percent.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: BURT
• Re: How come monospaced plain-text, light on black, makes the news ?
  • From: StarbladeEnkai
• Re: How come monospaced plain-text, light on black, makes the news ?
  • From: StarbladeEnkai
• Gisse's hillarious demands.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Everyone's just writing about what's on their minds... Duh !
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• PID , PIDD and ART computation
  • From: blanchetepj
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Passages: Revealing the nature of exoplanets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 164.6: Even More Re When Acceleration Turns Positive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: BURT
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: BURT
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Gieniu
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Ralph
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 164.5: More Re When Acceleration Turns Positive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Ralph
• Re: Non-geometric approach to gravity impossible??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 164.4: When Acceleration Turns Positive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: transparency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Greg Neill
• mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
  • From: Fallingeagle
• Re: There are no curves inside a black hole
  • From: BURT
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: BURT
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: BURT
• transparency
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: highfiver . high
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: hanson
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quick Question on Particle Physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Secret Campaign To stop polution to stop rain
  • From: Traveler
• T.J., why not hook me up ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Criticality accidents
  • From: jimp
• Re: Criticality accidents
  • From: jimp
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Secret Campaign To stop polution to stop rain
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Criticality accidents
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Criticality accidents
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Criticality accidents
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: yes
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Criticality accidents
  • From: jimp
• How come monospaced plain-text, light on black, makes the news ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Criticality accidents
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Information content of a helium balloon
  • From: jimp
• Re: Information content of a helium balloon
  • From: Andy Resnick
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Erac
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: New model of the neutron
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quick Question on Particle Physics
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Publications Online - Call for Reviewers
  • From: publisher
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Black is Back Starblade Enkai.
  • From: StarbladeEnkai
• Re: Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Information content of a helium balloon
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Quick Question on Particle Physics
  • From: wschlanger
• Big Improvement for Little Pictures
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Redshift 10 Galaxies?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: There are no curves inside a black hole
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• There are no curves inside a black hole
  • From: BURT
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Burt . sci
• Re: Tiny organisms move microstructures
  • From: jimp
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I'm reading new " Players " all the time, BioFreak.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Tiny organisms move microstructures
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: HollyWood fake.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• yes
  • From: ahmad
• Re: I'm reading new " Players " all the time, BioFreak.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Quasar Gravity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Information content of a helium balloon
  • From: jimp
• Quasar Gravity
  • From: Burt . sci
• Information content of a helium balloon
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: luke.conlin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Traveler
• Raw tuna is sensational.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I'm reading new " Players " all the time, BioFreak.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: hanson
• Re: Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: US chooses site for underground lab
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: US chooses site for underground lab
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Maybe it's only me, but....
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cold, vinegared rice ( with raw fish ) wrapped in seaweed.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: X.EXE's anti-spam system works fine.
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Publications Online - Call for Reviewers
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Erac
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Gordon
• Re: criticism of Uncertainty Principle
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 832 July 12, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: tareq . ams
• Re: Another brick in the wall: There's no relativistic mass
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Publications Online - Call for Reviewers
  • From: publisher
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Do two parallel electron beams attract?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 4 approaches to Quantum Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• What if Russia Invades Iraq?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: New model of the neutron
  • From: Tara Von Richardson
• Re: Special Relativity: addition of acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: CWatters
• Quantum Gravity 164.3: More Re Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 164.2: More Re Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 164.1: More Re Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 164.1: More Re Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• US chooses site for underground lab
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 164.1: More Re Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Quasar Hypersphere
  • From: Burt . sci
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Gordon
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating whee...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is the nature of the electron field in QFT ??
  • From: Ralph
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Special Relativity: addition of acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Special Relativity: addition of acceleration
  • From: buchstaebchen
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: What is the nature of the electron field in QFT ??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 159.9: Causal Influence of a Riccati Differential Equation on a Next Higher Order Riccati Equation
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Quantum Gravity 164.0: Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: Dear Leader
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: What is the nature of the electron field in QFT ??
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What is the nature of the electron field in QFT ??
  • From: tareq . ams
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: malibu
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Erac
• Violating causality.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• HollyWood fake.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: CWatters
• Re: criticism of Uncertainty Principle
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Free energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• What is the origin of the precession of a mounted rotating wheel ?
  • From: tareq . ams
• Sun NOT linked to climate change - New study
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Re: Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Re: Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Re: Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Quantum Gravity 164.0: Applications of Acceleration Causing Velocity in Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 159.9: Causal Influence of a Riccati Differential Equation on a Next Higher Order Riccati Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 159.9: Causal Influence of a Riccati Differential Equation on a Next Higher Order Riccati Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory
  • From: greysky
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: Bob Cain
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 July 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Can antimatter manifest to be gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can antimatter manifest to be gravity?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Can antimatter manifest to be gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Which of these people are easier to score ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Can antimatter manifest to be gravity?
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do you believe in the immortality of the soul?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Do you believe in the immortality of the soul?
  • From: tj Frazir
• The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are Quasiparticle?
  • From: galathaea
• X.EXE's anti-spam system works fine.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• What are Quasiparticle?
  • From: chilldown
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: How many thousands of U.S. dollars per month would I be getting ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: terahertz for measuring mass?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: srp
• Re: How many thousands of U.S. dollars per month would I be getting ?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: I help the ugly insane when I can, so shoot me.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Free energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Free energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Free energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: I help the ugly insane when I can, so shoot me.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• I help the ugly insane when I can, so shoot me.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• The Quantum-Cheneyverse
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: PD
• Re: terahertz for measuring mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Proof without words. Photographs of weird mathematical art.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: terahertz for measuring mass?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: terahertz for measuring mass?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Tomorrow's green nano factories
  • From: zamakoltha
• Which of these people are easier to score ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I thought you guys were on the ball.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: I am invlolved in a game
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: I am invlolved in a game
  • From: The Newsinator
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• terahertz for measuring mass?
  • From: EnigmaPaul@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Rich
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: roger
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Free energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to keep a secret on the internet.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Free energy
  • From: malibu
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: roger
• Re: How to keep a secret on the internet.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Louis Essen "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: malibu
• Re: Free energy
  • From: Benj
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Benj
• Free energy
  • From: mike3
• Louis Essen "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"
  • From: roger
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: roger
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: roger
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravimagnetics
  • From: Horace Heffner
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: roger
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: A one pound container of cosmic rays.
  • From: John Park
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: I am invlolved in a game
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I am invlolved in a game
  • From: newkid
• Re: Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Martin Phipps
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: George Chen
• How to keep a secret on the internet.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: The Two Curves of Space
  • From: Igor
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Is mass a property of matter?
  • From: malibu
• Re: The moon blocks cosmic rays.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• Cold, vinegared rice ( with raw fish ) wrapped in seaweed.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: criticism of Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Two Curves of Space
  • From: hanson
• Re: T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Martin Phipps
• How many thousands of U.S. dollars per month would I be getting ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Martin Phipps
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Erac
• Re: Gravimagnetics
  • From: Horace Heffner
• Re: What If? (On Anti-particles)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• The Two Curves of Space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• THE NEW "LOOK" OF SUPER CONDUCTIVITY
  • From: jerryhuge
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: panteltje
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 09, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a discovery influencing astrophysical research
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Aage Andersen
• The moon blocks cosmic rays.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• T.J. is Tao Ti Ching of Hong Chong, Vietnam ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Drinking like a fish or injecting meth.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: NASA exposes Apollo Hoax
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: How much would a pound of microwaves cost ?
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: srp
• Re: TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: How much would a pound of microwaves cost ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The jack-pot winners consume more at the expense of the losers.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA exposes Apollo Hoax
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: application of consumer electronics technologies
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• Re: application of consumer electronics technologies
  • From: gloopencrotum
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light Question
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• Speed of Light Question
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• How much would a pound of microwaves cost ?
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: application of consumer electronics technologies
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Florian
• Re: Modeling something as a wave doesn't make it wave.
  • From: The_Man
• Modeling something as a wave doesn't make it wave.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: gyansorova
• time, logic, geometry
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: Igor
• a discovery influencing astrophysical research
  • From: daharrell
• Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
  • From: Edward Green
• Babbling bums in the big city.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: efficiency and effectiveness of quantum cryptography
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: hanson
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: The_Man
• Advanced concept Public Relations Service for nations, religions, companies..
  • From: Tom Potter
• Black is Back Starblade Enkai.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Martin
• Re: Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Can Quantum Mechanics Be Derived?
  • From: Martin
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• What If? (On Anti-particles)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 163.0: Golden Ratio Related To Riccati Differential Equation Again
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 162.0: Remarkably Large ArXiv Literature on Condensates and Superconductors/Superfluids
  • From: OsherD
• Ion, electro-magnetic, and gravity propulsion.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: alapen
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: viability of penetration and nuclear explosion versus conventional tactical strikes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA Awards Contract for Space Station Hardware
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: eBeam hitting Plexiglas - Is the Glow Fluorescence or Cherenkov Radiation?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: efficiency and effectiveness of quantum cryptography
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New limit placed on photon charge
  • From: malibu
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Gravimagnetics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New limit placed on photon charge
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• New limit placed on photon charge
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Quantum Gravity 159.8: Gross-Pitaevskii Equation for Bose-Einstein Condensate and PI Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: hkrainko
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravimagnetics
  • From: gravman
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures
  • From: mike3
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Stephen Hawking
  • From: siren
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Homemade Cloud Chamber
  • From: Joel Odom
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: You guys are lame.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: hanson
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: hanson
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: malibu
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: malibu
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Which mass to use with Newton's Third ?
  • From: kangruh
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: what is the mass of spacetime?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Secret Campaign To Deny Global Warming
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Quantum Theory vs General Relativity"
  • From: Edih
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Yeka
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: CPU clock speed on earth versus in free space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: what is the mass of spacetime?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Sue...
• Journal of Physics Students (JPS) : Call for Papers*
  • From: jphysstu
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 159.7: Bose Einstein Condensation Quadratic Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: greysky
• Editorial: Big shots....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravimagnetics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• A mathematician crumples his phone bill.
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: eBeam hitting Plexiglas - Is the Glow Fluorescence or Cherenkov Radiation?
  • From: John Campbel
• Re: TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: The Secret Campaign To Deny Global Warming
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• eBeam hitting Plexiglas - Is the Glow Fluorescence or Cherenkov Radiation?
  • From: Bert Hickman
• Re: Gravimagnetics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Gravimagnetics
  • From: Horace Heffner
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: Sam Wormley
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 Jul 07 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lab equipment genius needed please - making a time fountain!
  • From: Androcles
• TIME IS ALSO QUANTIZED AS WELL AS ENERGIES
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Welcome to the Portal Of Evil, Jeff Relf!
  • From: StarbladeEnkai
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: lab equipment genius needed please - making a time fountain!
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Edih
• Re: Steorn in the news again
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Plan to rid the Internet of bigots and sociopaths
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sam Wormley on lying and blustering
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Your presidential candidates :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Exact solution of Schrodinger's equation of an atom in a uniform electric field
  • From: PD
• Exact solution of Schrodinger's equation of an atom in a uniform electric field
  • From: tareq . ams
• Re: Steorn in the news again
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• lab equipment genius needed please - making a time fountain!
  • From: crispin . cooper
• Re: where can you buy a ticker timer?
  • From: crispin . cooper
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: PD
• atom- energy standing wave
  • From: malibu
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Strength of a String
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Your presidential candidates :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Sam Wormley on lying and blustering
  • From: Tom Potter
• Sam Wormley on sociopaths
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Matthew
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Stephen Hawking
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: where can you buy a ticker timer?
  • From: Androcles
• where can you buy a ticker timer?
  • From: crispin . cooper
• Re: ARE MICROWAVES GENERATED THROUGH WORMHOLES?
  • From: Frapple Bonk
• Re: One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: ARE MICROWAVES GENERATED THROUGH WORMHOLES?
  • From: John Campbel
• Re: ARE MICROWAVES GENERATED THROUGH WORMHOLES?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• ARE MICROWAVES GENERATED THROUGH WORMHOLES?
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: littlejoe
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: littlejoe
• Interesting chemistry books that read just like a novel!
  • From: marie170
• Re: Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Difference between Rest Mass and Inertial Mass
  • From: littlejoe
• Re: One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures
  • From: jimp
• DARK MATTER: Racing to Capture Darkness
  • From: Sam Wormley
• One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures
  • From: Rich
• Copper rods "swarm" like fish
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 160.6: More Re How Sine Enters Into Strings and Springs and Elasticity
  • From: John Campbel
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 831 July 5, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: PD
• Re: Hyperion. Cool.
  • From: Rich
• Re: Twin On Train
  • From: PD
• Re: Stephen Hawking
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 160.6: More Re How Sine Enters Into Strings and Springs and Elasticity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electron standing wave
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: strange behavior of piezoceramics
  • From: John Campbel
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 160.5: How Sine Enters Into Strings and Springs and Elasticity
  • From: John Campbel
• Re: Hyperion. Cool.
  • From: Androcles
• calculating the number of photons in a cavity
  • From: nure123
• Re: Your presidential candidates :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 July 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: hanson
• Hyperion. Cool.
  • From: Rich
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: electron standing wave
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 160.5: How Sine Enters Into Strings and Springs and Elasticity
  • From: OsherD
• electron standing wave
  • From: malibu
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Twin On Train
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stephen Hawking
  • From: siren
• Re: Stephen Hawking
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Twin On Train
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Super Force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Stephen Hawking
  • From: Jong Kim
• Re: Plan to rid the Internet of bigots and sociopaths
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plan to rid the Internet of bigots and sociopaths
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Twin On Train
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: srp
• Re: Plan to rid the Internet of bigots and sociopaths
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Jules
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Matthew
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Matthew
• Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
  • From: Richard Herring
• The unanswerable question.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• " Peek-a-Boo " is for kids.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Notional time.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Twin On Train
  • From: Burt . sci
• Super Force
  • From: Burt . sci
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takes off
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sans ignorance, nothing is random.
  • From: Jeff☠Relf
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takes off
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Axions ruled out by PVLAS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Axions ruled out by PVLAS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Scuffed spheres rise to the top
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA exposes Apollo Hoax
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Angular inertia and 5 year olds: a sleepless mix
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: srp
• Re: Angular inertia and 5 year olds: a sleepless mix
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Angular inertia and 5 year olds: a sleepless mix
  • From: Antipodean . Lower . Mammal
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: strange behavior of piezoceramics
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: CWatters
• Steorn in the news again
  • From: CWatters
• Re: A bridge between science and religion discovered ?
  • From: Karl Uppiano
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A bridge between science and religion discovered ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: jacko
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Matthew
• Re: particle exchange
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Plan to rid the Internet of bigots and sociopaths
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: jacko
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Y. Porat on the Half-Shell
  • From: Y.Porat
• Help in understanding relative velocity in 3D
  • From: Matthew
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: jacko
• Re: Physics Today: The genesis of the International Geophysical Year (IGY)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: Tim
• Re: Question about pressure in a balloon
  • From: Tomoko Kanazawa
• Re: particle exchange
  • From: malibu
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Extra force needed for additional acceleration within a gravity...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: jacko
• Re: A bridge between science and religion discovered ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: Greg Neill
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 July 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: A bridge between science and religion discovered ?
  • From: hanson
• Y. Porat on the Half-Shell
  • From: The_Man
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Seeking the fastest quadruple precision numericla package...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 July 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Your presidential candidates :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Androcles
• Extra force needed for additional accellaration within a gravitational field
  • From: jacko
• Re: particle exchange
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What Creates Electron Shells?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Douglas Hofstadter: Going loopy over consciousness
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Physics Today: The genesis of the International Geophysical Year (IGY)
  • From: BioFreak
• strange behavior of piezoceramics
  • From: sl . physics
• A bridge between science and religion discovered ?
  • From: Caesar J. B. Squitti
• Quantum Gravity 160.4: The Sine-Elizabeth Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Maybe my last post to sci.physics 8^(
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Akira Bergman
• particle exchange
  • From: malibu
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Theoretical Basis for the Green house effect
  • From: fredfighter
• Re: Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Theoretical Basis for the Green house effect
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: partso2
• Re: The Pioneer anomaly is due to the characteristics of the space itself (differing permittivity)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why does Physics have two different theories: Classic and Quanntum (+SRT)?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Maybe my last post to sci.physics 8^(
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Angular inertia and 5yr olds = sleepless night
  • From: andy everett
• Some remark about SRT.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: raphfrk
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• interesting physics
  • From: Kentor
• Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
  • From: mutedHyperbole
• Re: Strong Force
  • From: malibu
• Re: Strong Force
  • From: Igor
• Re: Physicist explores what happened before the Big Bang
  • From: Igor
• Re: linked orthogonal rotations- new animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: How to determine the radioactivity of a nuclide source when required absorbed dose is known ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: linked orthogonal rotations- new animation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What Creates Electron Shells?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: Igor
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Physics Today: The genesis of the International Geophysical Year (IGY)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 July 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Expanding matter, expanding universe, red shift of light.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Edward Green
• How to determine the radioactivity of a nuclide source when required absorbed dose is known ?
  • From: wang
• Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: thermionic emission /diode
  • From: jimp
• Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: malibu
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: siren
• Re: Expanding matter, expanding universe, red shift of light.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who is dying in the Religious Wars? No republican children
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FAQ file contribution
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Fine-Tuned Universe-By Chance?===commets by Australian physic...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• linked orthogonal rotations- new animation
  • From: malibu
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new dawn for nuclear power
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Get REAL America "Back"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Angular inertia and 5yr olds = sleepless night
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physicist explores what happened before the Big Bang
  • From: PD
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: thermionic emission /diode
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: What Creates Electron Shells?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: thermionic emission /diode
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Oil paint particle gun
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: raphfrk
• Re: What Creates Electron Shells?
  • From: John Park
• Quantum Gravity 161.0: Korea Collapses Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physicist explores what happened before the Big Bang
  • From: George
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physicist explores what happened before the Big Bang
  • From: BURT
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 July 2007 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: thermionic emission /diode
  • From: vikb
• Re: FAQ file contribution
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physicist explores what happened before the Big Bang
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takesoff
  • From: BioFreak
• FAQ file contribution
  • From: JMD
• Re: Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Chemical potential of photons
  • From: nure123
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takes off
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takesoff
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takes off
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• New Book About Science on the Simpsons
  • From: Paul
• Re: thermionic emission /diode
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: thermionic emission /diode
  • From: jimp
• Re: Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• thermionic emission /diode
  • From: vikb
• Angular inertia and 5yr olds = sleepless night
  • From: Antipodean . Lower . Mammal
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Zio's coming for your key military guys? :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon
  • From: hanson
• Doomsday Men: The Real Dr Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Strong Force
  • From: PD
• Re: Strong Force
  • From: malibu
• Re: Has a Tunguska Crater Been Found?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: malibu
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Strong Force
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Strong Force
  • From: srp
• Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: raphfrk
• Strong Force
  • From: JillBones
• Does beryllium have a critical mass ?
  • From: raphfrk
• Re: Has a Tunguska Crater Been Found?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takesoff
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Get REAL America
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Driving the hydrogen economy, Clean[er] coal and Energy storage takes off
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• A new dawn for nuclear power
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please? Stuff best to avoid 4th
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 159.4: Biggus Dickus Physical A + B Quackions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Book of Abraham
  • From: Jong Kim
• before big bang
  • From: Trek
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Ariadne
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Ariadne
• Why does Physics have two different theories: Classic and Quanntum (+SRT)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 02, 2007
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A new dawn for nuclear power
  • From: George
• Re: Proposal for a new newsgroup - alt.usenet.bigots
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can comm sattelites be seen?
  • From: slalumondiere
• Re: Proposal for a new newsgroup - alt.usenet.bigots
  • From: mogul
• A new dawn for nuclear power
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can comm sattelites be seen?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Can comm sattelites be seen?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Can comm sattelites be seen?
  • From: partso2
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: partso2
• Re: Your presidential candidates :-)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Cranks take note: No-way physics
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Marquee LED Advertising Display Software
  • From: Scott
• Re: Cranks take note: No-way physics
  • From: srp
• Douglas Hofstadter: Going loopy over consciousness
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Cranks take note: No-way physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Bright outlook for solar cells
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Your presidential candidates :-)
  • From: BioFreak
• Can anyone explain this simply, please?
  • From: Ariadne
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: gyansorova
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: folding@home in outer space
  • From: narutocanada
• Re: How many seconds does it take
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: folding@home in outer space
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: dfnj2006
• How many seconds does it take
  • From: dfnj2006
• strange scalar wave effect - wave acceleration
  • From: Peter
• Re: folding@home in outer space
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Only argument for accidental universers. Infinite monkey theorem
  • From: Shadowland
• Re: allowed transitions
  • From: Androcles
• folding@home in outer space
  • From: narutocanada
• Re: allowed transitions
  • From: The old geezer
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: srp
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: CWatters
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Androcles
• "Gravity"
  • From: Sivad
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: What Does Length Contraction Mean in SR?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: piece of pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• piece of pi
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Quantum Gravity 160.3: Recent Applications of Sine-Gordon Solitons
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 160.2: Acceleration Explicit in Sine-Gordon Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: What Creates Electron Shells?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Basic Concepts of Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 160.1: Sine-Gordon Equation Related To Cyclic Acceleration-Constant-Deceleration Universe By PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity inside mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Sweating" homes: Cooling homes by vaporization of water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What Creates Electron Shells?
  • From: The_Man
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Sivad
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sivad