Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
- From: Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:56:27 +0100
In message <1183086001.448369.86270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mutedHyperbole <zutalors212@xxxxxxxxx> writes
A perfect cable in physics can perfectly transmit a tensile force but
not a compressive force.
That's what exam questions generally refer to as a "light inextensible string".
Is there such a thing as an "anti-cable"
which can only transmit a compressive force but not a tensile force?
A column of "light incompressible bricks". Ask any architect.
What you just said. You might also inquire about how they handle shear forces.
What would some of its properties be?
You're not the first to notice the duality between strings/chains and columns -- Robert Hooke put it to good use in designing the dome of St Paul's Cathedral:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9149(199801)52:1%3C39:HCC%3E2.0.CO;
2-8
--
Richard Herring
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
- From: mutedHyperbole
- Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding Schrodinger's cat.
- Next by Date: Re: thermionic emission /diode
- Previous by thread: Re: Expanding matter, expanding universe, red shift of light.
- Next by thread: Re: Questions on my theoretical "anti-cable"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|