Re: Is mass a property of matter?

On Jul 9, 10:42 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 9, 1:41 pm, "roger" <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1184003338.150605.41210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 9, 11:15 am, malibu <vega...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, it is said that under certain circumstances,
i.e. significant fractions of c, that the mass changes.

That's one already.

I don't think mass is a constant. The number, placement and
type of atoms stays the same, but the mass is the
result of the reaction of the matter to an incoming and outgoing
omnidirectional current, or aether,
and if this current is changed, or the reaction of the matter
to the current is manipulated, the mass can be changed
during that time.

The mass may even be made to approach zero in one
direction, much the same as it increases in one direction
when matter is going c speeds.

You're saying that the mass can be less than the rest
mass? How, exactly?

RelativityTheory is wrong when it says mass changes with speed.
I don't believe this, and it also wasn't measured in particle accelerators.

Relativity has two contexts for talking about mass, one which is
invariant with choice of reference frame and one which changes. Both
have very clear and distinct definitions and domains of applicability.
Both, in a manner consistent with those contexts, have been amply
verified in particle accelerators.





But falling in a gravity field with an acceleration >g
gives a negative weight(force).
Ie. falling normal (with g) makes the object "weightless",
but falling even faster (ie. with additional acceleration)
the weight of the object becomes negative.
Simple maths.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

--------
parrot
no accelerator verified relativistic mass

you sinply dont know how to interpret
thos expariamntal data
it is not mass that icreases
it is the energy invested that icrease
and it becomes mor difficult to add more
acceleration tha tis why accelerated aprticle
come gradually to a top limit of velocity

guess why ?:
it is becaus the accelerating
entity itself has a top limit of velocity
that is apparently c

force and ebergy are transmitted ny
collition between the acelerating agent
and the accelerated object

you can think about the gass in a rocket
accelerating the the rocket

the gass itself has an upper limit of velocity

etc etc etc no need for further expalnations

ATB
T.Porat
------------

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is mass a property of matter?
    ... that the mass changes. ... and it also wasn't measured in particle accelerators. ... do you feny or donr agree that c is the upper limit ... And the rocket does not share the gas's upper limit of velocity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is mass a property of matter?
    ... that the mass changes. ... result of the reaction of the matter to an incoming and outgoing ... and it also wasn't measured in particle accelerators. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is mass a property of matter?
    ... that the mass changes. ... result of the reaction of the matter to an incoming and outgoing ... and it also wasn't measured in particle accelerators. ... come gradually to a top limit of velocity ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
    ... as the result of an increase in the velocity of a mass. ... you have to take energy from somewhere else. ... particle accelerators do have really large electric ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... > not simply inertial mass. ... perfect Lorentz transformation properties. ... > Accelerators such as cyclotrons, ... For free particles, ...
    (sci.physics)