Which of these people are easier to score ?
- From: Jeff☠Relf <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Jul 2007 09:06:25 GMT
Which of these people/Message-IDs are easier to score, Gisse:
" Eric_Gisse news:1184019482.332942.82840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff☠Relf news:Jeff_Relf_2007_Jul_9__8_39_AC@xxxxxxxxx
Ben_Rudiak news:f6r50m$5q1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
gloopencrotum news:1183849113.775221.224970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" ?
Scoring on " gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk " might work for Ben_Rudiak,
scoring on " Jeff_Relf " has worked for years.
My message ID tells you my name, ISP and date, e.g.:
" July 9‾th, at 8:39:02 a.m., Seattle time ".
The " A " in " 8_39_AC " in my Message-ID indicates a.m.
and the " C " is 2 ( seconds ) base62 ( A-Z , a-z , 0-9 ).
X.EXE, my hand-rolled newsreader,
sorts " players " ( i.e. posters ) by how " rich " they are.
They ( and others in the immediate subthread, weighted by level )
get richer when I reply to them.
In " In Box " mode, I only see players with " UnRead " posts.
One button markes a post as read and the next unread pops up.
Each post begins with the subthread, so I never lose sight of it.
In the spirit of Google's PageRank...
A player is Rich if he got a lot of replies --> per post <--
from players who ( recursively ) got a lot of replies per post.
Multiple cross-posts count as multiple posts.
So a player who posts one decent post ( and nothing more )
beats a player with 50 not-so-decent posts, on average.
A maximum of 50 ( most recent ) posts per player are retained.
In InBox mode...
The " Virtual_Cash " that I spend ( i.e. the replies I make )
is always the highest, making the players I've talked to the Richest.
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Phy_R.TXT "
is an example of the Richest players in my ( Relf's ) InBox mode.
A screen shot of X.EXE after hitting Phy to create Phy_R.TXT:
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Phy_R_TXT.PNG ".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which of these people are easier to score ?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Which of these people are easier to score ?
- References:
- Re: efficiency and effectiveness of quantum cryptography
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
- How to keep a secret on the internet.
- From: Jeff☠Relf
- Re: How to keep a secret on the internet.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: efficiency and effectiveness of quantum cryptography
- Prev by Date: Re: Is mass a property of matter?
- Next by Date: Tomorrow's green nano factories
- Previous by thread: Re: How to keep a secret on the internet.
- Next by thread: Re: Which of these people are easier to score ?
- Index(es):