Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:33:11 -0700
On Jul 14, 8:24 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
malibu wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:28 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
aegis wrote:
But how does that suggest that the vacuum of space canI doesn't--Do a bit of reading about vacuum energy
generate particles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy
Sam, I am becoming convinced that
you are either a robot or a complete schizophrenic.
Reading 3 paragraphs into this link- which you have obviously not
read-
assuming you CAN read and comprehend- we come to the following
statement:
"Vacuum energy has a number of consequences. For one, vacuum
fluctuations are always created as particle/antiparticle pairs."
You are a very strange man, Sam.
John
And those vacuum fluctuations are detectable in experiment, John.
The Force of Empty Space
http://focus.aps.org/story/v2/st28
I think what is so frustrating about you, Sam, is
that you contradict yourself every time
you open your mouth.
But I'm starting to realize that this must be
a necessary skill to develope
in order to accept QM.
Write 1000 times on the blackboard, Sam-
paradox = wrong science
(for paradox read QM)
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- References:
- intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- intrinsic energy
- Prev by Date: Re: mechanics, rolling, sliding, spinning, Friction
- Next by Date: Re: Sh_t just is, the cosmos is immobile.
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|