Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 03:37:03 GMT
malibu wrote:
On Jul 14, 8:55 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't understand your frustration, John. The world is not Newtonian.
Oh, most of what we experience is certainly well described by Newton,
Maxwell and the like... but we have copious evidence for far stranger
phenomena that require fruitful theories like relativity and the quantum
electrodynamics to explain. It's a wonderful and fascinating world, John!
Hey, did you see that photon fly by, John? Good! Neither did I. If one
of us had seen it... it wouldn't exist anymore!
Cheers,
-Sam
I don't understand why you prefer to not understand, Sam.
Keep asking 'why' until you get a proper answer, Sam. Don't be satisfied with
the pap that you spout.
It is not and never will be an answer to say "because the world is strange."
Our effort with our Science is to make thing *not strange*.
It's called *understanding*, Sam, and it cannot be accomplished by teaching people that it cannot be accomplished. That is Anti-Science, Sam. Its name is QM.
John
QM explains many things, John. QM has contributed, necessarily, to our
modern society with GPS, Cell Phones and CD players.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- References:
- intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- intrinsic energy
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by Date: Re: photon model
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|