Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- From: Divij Rao <divij_urdbest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 05:43:25 -0000
On Jul 10, 9:47 pm, s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 8 juil, 07:50, Divij Rao <divij_urdb...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
First hunch is that you are dealing with an asymptote,
with q trailing behind p at AB - deltaAB
i dont know so much...in simpler words...plz
Hope this helps.
didnot understand the meaning .
André Michaud
thank you,
Divij
Sorry for the delay, I just saw your post.
I requote your question here for convenience:
A and B are 2 positions in coordinate system, particles p,q are at A
and B respectively. p moves perpendicular to AB, q is directed towards
p always, both have speed= v m/s, distance b/w them initially is d,
find the distance b/w them at time=infinity.
I will try to make you see what I conclude.
Imagine position A and B as lying on a horizontal line (x axis ?)
you have p initially located at A and q initially located at B
the distance between p and q is d, and both p and q have the
same velocity, so imagine p and q tied together by a string,
which will force q to always move towards p as p moves away.
now if you set the particles in motion at velocity v, p is going
to move upwards vertically with q being pulled along, always
moving towards p.
Now, the string is mentioned only so that you can clearly
see how q can always point towards p.
At the beginning, q will move almost horizontally but will
progressively angle upwards since it is following p which
is moving vertically upwards.
After some time, q will end up moving vertically as it
trails behind p. since both have the same velocity,
q will be unable to catch up with p and will forever
follow behind.
You are dealing with uniform motion for both p and q
I did not do the actual math, so I don't know whether
q will catch up some with p. I expect so, but I really
wouldn't know without doing the actual math.
André Michaud
excellent idea!
but i m still not sure... suppose p has moved a distance x, after some
time say t, by speed, we cant say that distance between p and q is the
same, as per the xample, the string MAY become loose. maybe u r
correct.
thanks a lot, all comments will be appreciated.
Regards,
Divij
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- From: srp
- Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- References:
- Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- From: srp
- Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- From: Divij Rao
- Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- From: srp
- Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by Date: Quantum Gravity 166.0: PI Ties In With Fibonacci, Tribonacci, Tetranacci, Pentanacci, Hexanacci, Heptanacci, etc. Numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- Next by thread: Re: P AND Q 2 PARTICLES
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|