Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:26:42 GMT
malibu wrote:
QM has gone as far as "we can't know more" in numerous
areas. It's a dead end.
Yes, there are some houses, but it's not
a through street.
anyone who says its the only road
will go no farther.
John
But you've never even studied the Schrödinger equation, John.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- References:
- intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- intrinsic energy
- Prev by Date: Re: e.m.f.: The field of force associated with electric charge in motion.
- Next by Date: Re: intrinsic energy
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|