Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:50:19 -0700
On Jul 15, 1:26 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
malibu wrote:
QM has gone as far as "we can't know more" in numerous
areas. It's a dead end.
Yes, there are some houses, but it's not
a through street.
anyone who says its the only road
will go no farther.
John
But you've never even studied the Schrödinger equation, John.
explain it to me and my 13 year old so
we can both understand it
not a link
a brief concise understandable explanation
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- References:
- intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: aegis
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: malibu
- Re: intrinsic energy
- From: Sam Wormley
- intrinsic energy
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by Date: Help regarding differential form of maxwell's equations
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|